Members of the Parliament I am pleased to send you this letter concerning the debate on Polish affairs, which is to be held this week in the European Parliament. Talks, dialogue and direct exchange of information are the only feasible way of resolving doubts and misconceptions that are the root of that debate. I am confident that insufficient information and some misunderstandings are what caused many Members of the European Parliament to express their concern with the situation in Poland. My government, supported by the parliamentary majority selected in democratic elections, has been implementing legislative changes that ultimately meet all relevant European standards. The legal solutions applying to the Constitutional Court, or the public media, are soundly based on the principles followed in any democratic state ruled by law, and they respect the values embodied in the Constitution. The outcome of the parliamentary elections that took place last autumn in Poland was unprecedented. For the first time since 1989, Polish citizens opted for the winning party to have the parliamentary majority. Poles chose specifically the programme proposed by my political party and they expect to see it implemented. The millions of Poles who voted for the Law and Justice Party have been looking forward to the changes that are included in our programme and are currently being introduced by my government. For 25 years Poland has been building democratic standards typical of a lawabiding state. The constitutional values are reflected in all steps and measures taken by my government that lead to changes in law. At this point, I feel obliged to briefly comment on the reasons for which we decided to modify the regulations on the Constitutional Court and the public media. New provisions pertaining to the Constitutional Court were needed to repair the damages which came as a result of vote enforced by the previously ruling coalition at the Polish parliament towards the end of its term. Furthermore, the changes we have introduced are aimed at improving the efficiency and performance of the Constitutional Court. The parliamentary majority that previously ruled in Poland appointed judges to complete the composition of the Constitutional Court by breaking the provisions of the Constitution. The Court itself, in its decision of 3 Dec. 2015, recognised the fact that the changes in the Court composition made by the previous majority, basically at the end of its term, were against the Polish Constitution. The actions of the previously ruling parliamentary majority – constituting a breach of Constitution – led to the Court composition being dominated by judges representing the coalition of parties that lost the last year elections. It was the aforementioned decision of the Constitutional Court, along with many experts’ opinions, that showed the need to correct the errors made by the previous parliamentary majority whose decisions concerning the Court blatantly violated the provisions of the Polish Constitution. It should be stressed here that in many EU countries the Constitutional Court plays a far less significant role than in Poland. In some of those countries, there is no such court, and in others it is not legally foreseen to verify acts with respect to their compliance with the Constitution. There are countries where the Constitutional Court judges are elected by the President. It only demonstrates that Polish solutions concerning the Court do not fall short of any European standard, and are, in fact, more advanced than in many other EU states, granting the Court far greater powers. As for the changes in the public media introduced by the parliamentary majority, we are of the opinion that they conform to the European standards of public broadcasters. Moreover, the changes we have initiated are an attempt to restore genuine objectivity and non-partisan character of the Polish public media. Until recently many groups in Poland voiced their concern, questioning the impartiality of public broadcasters. The Polish media environment appreciates unlimited freedom and pluralism, which is quite obvious when you study its current structure and condition. In our opinion, the public media are in need of changes that will remove the political bias and ensure improved standards in terms of objectivity and fairness. This is the only goal of the changes we are implementing. This is not the first time an attempt is made to repair the Republic of Poland. It is something we need to do now. Poles are Europeans. We are proud members of the European Union. And yet, many Poles feel they have been deprived of the benefits of economic transformation. We wish to give them all a chance to take part in those benefits. Most Poles voted for my political party and chose our programme. We will not let them down and will continue to introduce changes we have promised to our supporters. This change is in the best interest of Poland and the whole of Europe. The more European countries have a fair rule, the stronger the EU will be. I believe that the debate planned in the European Parliament shall be honest and genuine, and that the comprehensive information package the Polish government has prepared will help clear up all misconceptions. My government is prepared for the debate and we will be more than happy to explain any matters that raise your concern. Regards Beata Szydło