Activity guide and evaluation rubric - Unit 1 - Task 2 - Keep improving my learning skills - Writing Task

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia
Vice President for Academic Issues and Research
Course: English A2
Code: 900002
Activity guidelines and evaluation rubric – Task 2: Keep
improving my learning skills. Writing Task.
1. Activity description
Type of the activity: Group – Collaborative
Evaluation moment : Intermediate at Unit 1
Activity higher score: 70 points
Activity starting date: Monday,
Activity deadline: Sunday, march 13th,
st
February 21 , 2022
2022
In this activity, it is expected to achieve the following learning results:
To understand and recognize the different topics in the e-book (modules 1 - 4),
through producing sentences, reading small descriptions, and other language
activities, using the vocabulary and linguistic structures according to level.
Para esta tarea tenga en cuenta:
•
•
•
Las participaciones o aportes compartidos en el foro dentro de los 3 últimos
días antes de cerrar la tarea no serán realimentadas por su tutor y serán
evaluados acorde con el nivel medio o el nivel bajo descrito en la rúbrica de
evaluación. Resolución rectoral 006808 del 19 de agosto de 2014 que habla
sobre los trabajos colaborativos y uso de medios diferentes al foro
https://bit.ly/3lplLYx
Semanalmente, su tutor pasará a realimentar sus avances.
Se espera que la producción escrita sea de autoría propia y por ningún motivo
tomada de internet u otra fuente. De igual manera, el uso de traductor debe
ser de forma mesurada y solo de consulta. En caso de identificar plagio, su
tarea será calificada con cero (0,0).
Task outline:
•
Download the “Anexo 1 – Task 2 - Keep improving my learning skills. Writing
Task.”
•
You will collect the evidence of the development of different activities
through Genially, Wix or Paddlet. (En este caso cuál habría que pensar cual es el
objetivo pedagógico de que recopilen la evidencia en una de estas herramientas)
•
You will write directly on the discussion forum Unit 1 Task 2. Avoid attaching
files in order to receive feedback from your course mates and tutor.
Remember this is a collaborative task, then you need communicate
and help during the whole process in the forum.
Step 1: Module exercises. Develop 3 exercises.
Step 2: Ruth’s routine – Frequency adverbs.
Step 3: Countable nouns. Preparing a Recipe (main course)
Step 4: Simple present, Simple past and past progressive.
Step 5: Reflection and personal growth.
Step 6: Upload all the above in an online space
To develop this task, consider:
At initial information environment, you must:
• Check constantly the course agenda.
At learning environment, you must:
• Study and develop the activities in the e-book – Modules 1- 4
• Read the activity guide exhaustively.
• write directly on the discussion forum Unit 1 Task 2. Avoid attaching files in order
to receive feedback from your course mates and tutor.
• Participate in the forum since the beginning of the task.
At evaluation environment, you must:
• Upload the final product in a .pdf document.
Name of the activity: _name_Group_WritingTask
Example: JuanitoPerez_876_WritingTask
Individual work evidence:
•
•
•
Each student develops all the 5 steps in the forum.
Participate in the forum since the beginning of the task.
Compile the activity in one of the following spaces:
Padlet: https://padlet.com/
Wix: https://es.wix.com/
Genially: https://genial.ly/es/
Group work evidence
• Check whether your course mates’ links work.
• Contribute with ideas to do the compilation of the activity.
2. General guidelines for the development of the evidence to
submit
For the group work evidence, consider the following guidelines
•
•
•
•
•
Every member of the group must participate with academic contributions in
the activity development.
Before delivering the requested product, all the requirements indicated in this
activity guide must be checked.
The final product must be sent in the Evaluation Environment.
Each student must give feedback to one of his/her partners. The comments should
remark mistakes, aspects to improve and contribute to the debate.
Each student is responsible for his/her process.
In any case, the standards of reference must be complied. Academic plagiarism must be
avoided. Students can support the written products by using the Turnitin tool found on
the virtual campus.
Consider that In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article 99, it is considered
as offenses that undermine the academic order,
Among others, the following: literal e) “Plagiarism, that is, submitting as of its own
authorship the all or part of a work, document or invention made by another person.
It also implies the use of quotes or false references, or proposing quotes where there is
no match between it and the reference ”and literal f) “Reproducing or copying for profit,
educational materials or results of research products, which have intellectual rights
reserved for the University.
The academic sanctions the student will face are the following:
a) In cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the respective academic work or
evaluation, the grade that will be imposed will be zero points without prejudice to the
corresponding disciplinary sanction.
b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the academic work whatever its
nature, the qualification that will be imposed will be zero points, without prejudice to
the corresponding disciplinary sanction.
Evaluation rubric Format
Type of the activity: Group - Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Intermediate at Unit 1
Activity higher score: 70 points
High level: The student selects the 3 activities of the module
and work on them. The student shares the module activities in
the forum correctly executed.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 to 10
points.
First evaluation
standard:
Module
activities.
This criterion
represents 10
points of the
total of 70
points of the
activity.
Medium level: The student selects 1 or 2 activities of the
module and work on them. The student shares the module
activities in the forum correctly executed.
The student shares the module activities in the forum with
mistakes.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 3 to 6
points.
Low level: the student doesn’t select the activities of the
module to work on them. The student doesn’t share the module
activities in the forum.
The student selects the activity(ies) but does not share
developed them in the forum
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 to 2
points.
Second
evaluation
standard:
academic
contents.
This criterion
represents 15
points of the
total of 70
points of the
activity.
High level: the student develops the steps oriented by the
guide according to the academic contents of the course for this
activity.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 10 to 15
points
Medium level: the student develops most of the steps oriented
by the guide according to the academic contents of the course
for this activity.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 to 9 points
Low level: the student does not develop the steps oriented by
the guide according to the academic contents of the course.
The student develops the steps oriented by the guide, but they
are not according to the academic contents in the course.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 to 4
points.
High level: The student produces written texts given the
academic knowledge he/she has obtained in the development of
his/her written task.
Third evaluation
standard:
Language
development
If your work is at this level, you will get from 12 to 15
points
Medium level: The student produces written texts given the
academic knowledge he/she has obtained in the development of
his/her written task, but they have some mistakes in the writing
process.
This criterion
If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 to 11
represents 15
points
points of the total
of 70 points of the
Low level: The student does not produce written texts given the
activity.
academic knowledge he/she has obtained in the development of
his/her written task.
The student produces written texts given the academic
knowledge he/she has obtained in the development of his/her
written task, but they have a lot of mistakes in the writing
process.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 to 6
points.
High level: the student participates in the forum on time to let
the tutor provide feedback to his/her activity and the student
uploads the final document in the corresponding environment.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 to 10
points.
Fourth evaluation
standard: Forum
Medium level: the student participates in the forum in the last
participation and
days of the activity and the tutor cannot provide feedback to
final document
his/her activity.
The student does not upload the final document in the
corresponding environment and just let the activity in the
forum.
This criterion
represents 10
points of the total
If your work is at this level, you will get from 4 to 6 points
of 70 points of the
activity.
Low level: The student does nor participate in the forum.
The student does not upload the final document in the
corresponding environment.
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points.
High Level: The student demonstrates reflective thinking in all of the
questions included in this task, (step 5). The student self-assess
critically his/her score for this criterion.
Fifth evaluation
standard:
If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 to 10
Reflection and
personal growth. points.
Medium Level: The student shares the answers to some questions of
his reflection and personal growth in relation to his performance, (step
5). The student self-critically assigns her score for this criterion.
This criterion
represents 10
points of the total If your work is at this level, you will get from 4 to 6 points
of 70 points of the
activity.
Low Level: The student does not share the answers to the questions
of his reflection and personal growth; and / or does not self-assess or
share her score.
The student does not participate in the forum; and / or plagiarism is
demonstrated in her/his work.
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points
High Level: The student uploads the 5 steps proposed in the guide in
the online space. It is well presented and it fulfills the expected
objectives of the activity.
Sixth evaluation
standard: Online If your work is at this level, you will get from 7 to 10
points.
space.
Medium Level: The student uploads the 5 steps proposed in the guide in
an online space, but it is disorganized and/or not fulfills the expected
This criterion
objectives of the activity.
represents 10
points of the total If your work is at this level, you will get from 4 to 6 points
of 70 points of the
activity.
Low Level: The student does not upload the 5 steps proposed in the
guide in an online space.
If your work is at this level, you will get 0 points