NAME: Panduro Castro Eisin Wilfredo DATE: May 15,2020 WRITING FOR ENGINEERING - CONCLUSIONS - OUTLINE Fill in this chart with KEY INFORMATION (note form) for this section. Use one or two pieces of information per aim (depending on the aim). You will develop more ideas in the writing activity. Also, pick up ONE key phrase/verb you will use in each section as necessary. Your rough draft must be based on this outline. It will not be corrected if this outline is not filled and handed in. The outline MUST contain NOTES. The draft will not be graded if this document is not completed as requested. NOTES / KEY WORDS (if you write complete sentences here, your draft WILL NOT BE CORRECTED AND THE SCORE IS 0) AIM Revisit previous sections of report. Aim: Anti-seismic building in Peru Method: Fluid Viscous Dampers(FVD) Results: Reduction 80% in 2 essential Summarizing/ revisiting general or key results. PHRASE TO BE USED TO PRESENT INFORMATION. This study developed a It was demonstrated that aspects. (new systems vs conventional) Mapping (state, from your point of view what caused the events in the project) Comparison between new system with FVD and the Also include causation language conventional one. Due to Reduction of acceleration 90% & deflection 65% We can say that Seismic Dampers (FVD) This reduction must have Best choice for high structures been caused by It means that Achievement /contribution. The damage is insignificant in the building Refining the implications. Increases evacuation time during an earthquake Saves money on repair costs (after) Reduce errors to improve the structural behavior Current and future work. Care while analyzing different buildings (Peru) Applications. Several Seismic Zone (Coast, Mountains & Jungle) Limitations. Our results are remarkable, The purpose of Further investigations should Care should be taken to CONCLUSION This study developed a structural anti-seismic prototype implemented by fluid viscous dampers tested in a seismic table. It was demonstrated that, in two essential aspects analyze, there was a reduction of 80% between the new system and a conventional one. Due to value of acceleration and deflection produced by the building with the new system was 90% and 65% respectively lower than the value obtained by the conventional building, we can say that the advantages are of great importance. This reduction must have been caused by the use of the seismic dampers (FVD). It means that buildings with fluid viscous dampers are one of the best choices to improve the structural behavior. Our results are remarkable, because the damage in the structure is insignificant and increases the evacuation time, which is the purpose of the engineering against this natural disasters. Also, it saves money on repair costs. Further investigations should be done in order to have results with less errors and improve other aspects of the structural behavior. Furthermore, care should be taken to analyze buildings in the country, as we have several seismic zones on the coast, mountains and jungle.
