Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computers in Industry journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-in-industry Development of immersive bridge digital twin platform to facilitate bridge damage assessment and asset model updates Muhammad Fawad a,b, Marek Salamak a , Qian Chen c,* , Mateusz Uscilowski a , Kalman Koris b, Marcin Jasinski a, Piotr Lazinski a, Dawid Piotrowski a a b c Department of Mechanics and Bridges, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Poland Department of Structural Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary Division of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia Okanagan Campus, Canada A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Augmented Reality (AR) Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Bridge infrastructure Digital Twin (DT) Immersive planning and control Conventional infrastructure asset management practices have heavily relied on static data collection and suffered from decision lags. Though advanced Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems were extensively explored based on multi-functional sensor deployment, asset model updating has not been achieved to facilitate timely and effective decision-making of infrastructure managers due to a lack of system integration. To address this challenge, this study develops the Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) to allow infrastructure managers to automate the SHM processes of bridges and engage them in immersive decision-making processes based on Scan-to-BIM and Augmented Reality (AR) technologies. A novel 3D game engine is proposed as part of IBDTP and was tested using a single-span concrete arch bridge located in Poland. Results show that the mea­ surement data collected and presented in IBDTP improves the infrastructure managers’ accessibility to major damage data of the bridge to plan for future interventions. The functions of the IBDTP can be potentially scaled for different types of bridges and critical infrastructure, substantially improving the traditional SHM in terms of data management and 3D structural visualization. 1. Introduction Bridges are an integral component of infrastructural networks, bearing the weight of various operational and environmental factors that can gradually influence their structural performance and integrity over the years (Zhou and Sun, 2019; Zumstein et al., 2022; Fawad et al., 2019). Maintaining their long-term durability and safety necessitates the implementation of robust Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems (Kaloop et al., 2022; Al-Nasar and Al-Zwainy, 2022). The SHM facilitates effective maintenance planning by assessing the structural health of bridges in order to foresee deterioration and catastrophic scenarios (Ndinga Okina et al., 2023). The SHM of bridges received the attention of bridge maintenance authorities in the past few decades (Alokita et al., 2018; García-Macías and Ubertini, 2022). The prevalent SHM practices have focused on the use of information communication technologies such as fiber optic sensors and the application of advanced algorithms such as bayesian inference and probabilistic approaches (Figueiredo E, 2022; Sonbul and Rashid, 2023; Deng et al., 2023; Palma et al., 2023). Despite these data-driven methods, infrastructure managers find it challenging to obtain the up-to-date information about the bridges and have difficulties understanding the complex 3D geometry of structures (Omar and Nehdi, 2018; Vagnoli M and Remenyte-Prescott, 2018). Integrating technology with the SHM system will be a viable technical solution for bridge asset monitoring (Fawad et al., 2024; Mohammad­ khorasani et al., 2023). Thus, there is a growing need for innovative solutions to help them establish a comprehensive understanding of bridge condition states and associated information around operation and maintenance (Palma et al., 2023; He et al., 2022a). Particularly new solutions are needed to help them identify issues early and take proac­ tive measures to maintain the safety and longevity of the assets. Emerging technologies such as reality capture technologies and building information modelling (BIM) technologies hold the promise of revolutionizing the infrastructure management processes, offering new avenues for data depth, accessibility, and three-dimensional * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (M. Fawad), [email protected] (M. Salamak), [email protected] (Q. Chen), [email protected] (M. Uscilowski), [email protected] (K. Koris), [email protected] (M. Jasinski), [email protected] (P. Lazinski), [email protected] (D. Piotrowski). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2024.104189 Received 16 April 2024; Received in revised form 5 September 2024; Accepted 12 September 2024 Available online 23 September 2024 0166-3615/© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/). M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 visualization (Chen et al., 2018, 2020; Fawad et al., 2023). Numerous studies have emphasized the benefits of Scan-to-BIM in automating data collection for structural maintenance through 3D laser scanning (Allegra et al., 2020; Qiu et al., 2022) whose data is captured from the project site in the form of point clouds (Tang et al., 2022). The point cloud data can be further processed and integrated with the BIM tool to enable real-time detection of structural irregularities and deformations, there­ fore contributing to the development of safety and reliability programs for bridges (Bosché et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2022; Meyer et al., 2022). The Scan-to-BIM approach also plays a vital role when integrated with SHM as it yields a Digital Twin (DT) model of the bridge (Zhang et al., 2023). This DT model often integrates a computational model of a bridge with a real bridge equipped with sensors to monitor and optimize asset performance, utilizing bidirectional data exchange between physical and digital models of a bridge to enable almost real-time monitoring, prompt anomaly detection, and proactive maintenance of the bridge asset (khorasani and Fernando, 2023). This integrated framework has proved to be specifically useful to maintain structural integrity under dynamic conditions (Gao et al., 2023). To enhance the user experience of implementing DT models, immersive technologies have been explored to support model visuali­ zation, such as Augmented Reality (AR). Practitioners developed tool­ kits such as Trimble XR10 that include intelligent AR-based data dashboards to engage construction and infrastructure stakeholders to obtain intuitive information about projects. Current practices, however, may focus on siloed applications ranging from the Scan-to-BIM approach for BIM generation, DT for infrastructural management, to applications of AR for bridge inspection individually. A lack of research is reported to showcase the use of the Scan-to-BIM method as the basis of an updated DT model for bridge SHM which can be further used with an AR application for immersive and interactive decision-making. This research intends to fill this research gap where a novel gamification approach is developed to develop DT of bridge SHM based on the Scanto-BIM approach. Further, the same DT model is converted to an AR application deployed to an AR headset which can perform real-time onsite bridge health monitoring. To leverage the benefits of existing technologies, this study develops an Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) to improve infrastructure management and moni­ toring. This immersive DT explains the conception, development, and implementation of an integrated bridge digital twin, and how damage detection can be performed for intervention planning. The rest of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the literature review on the existing approaches to SHM and DT develop­ ment for bridges; Section 3 describes the research framework of IBDTP including the designing of the SHM system, IoT data collection, and visualization of bridge SHM data using AR-based 3D game engines and simulations. Section 4 illustrates the case study of a concrete arch bridge in Poland to test the usefulness of the proposed IBDPT which emphasizes how this digital twin supports predictive decision-making, allowing authorities to anticipate possible structural problems, maximize main­ tenance plans, and schedule interventions ahead of time. Section 6 discusses the managerial implications of the IBDPT, followed by the conclusions and future work in Section 7. distributed sensing systems, feature high sensitivity, long-range capa­ bilities, and immunity to electromagnetic interference to be suitable for deployment in large infrastructure assets. Nevertheless, these methods exhibit certain constraints, as they are highly dependent on manual intervention, causing several issues such as time-consuming processes, labor-intensive work, involvement of human errors, and challenged quantification of measured data (Zhang et al., 2022). Moreover, they lack comprehensiveness and detailed damage evaluation in the context of advancements in bridge monitoring (Sonbul and Rashid, 2023). Considering these limitations, these methods were replaced by digitally advanced and robust sensors like wired strain gauges, fiber-optic sen­ sors, acceleration sensors, piezoelectric transducers, and Liquid leveling sensors for accurate and rapid monitoring of bridge health (Vegas, 2021; Chen et al., 2017; He et al., 2022b), but even the system using such tools have limitations concerning data management and 3D visualization of structural defects in real-time. With the increasing boom of technological advancement, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Twins, and Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR) have taken over the structural monitoring domain of the construction industry (Nassereddine et al., 2022). For example, AI algorithms such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Autoencoders are utilized for feature extraction, anomaly detection, and classification tasks in SHM. Bayesian models have shown the potential to update the probability of damage or failure based on new data and provide a probabilistic framework for decision-making. These methods can process large volumes of data and identify patterns associated with structural damage. The SHM and digitalization tools are becoming more popular in bridge engineering thus their integration in the context of bridge health monitoring is a cutting-edge approach (Mohammadkhorasani et al., 2023). It combines real-time AR experi­ ences with SHM data, bridging the gap between digital and physical assets, and offering an innovative platform for the monitoring and maintenance of bridges (Dong C-Z, 2021; Moreu et al., 2017). By superimposing digital information onto the physical bridge, AR en­ hances visualization, real-time data analysis, and decision-making ca­ pabilities (Yogeeswaran et al., 2023; Awadallah and Sadhu, 2023). 2.2. Advancement in digital twin infrastructure The Digital Twin of a bridge comprises a connectivity module that enables synchronization of the physical and virtual assets along the as­ set’s life cycle stages (Sacks et al., 2020), as well as a virtual duplication of an actual bridge (Honghong et al., 2023). Existing DT models help in bridge risk assessment, creating comprehensive 3D models for simu­ lating various load scenarios, assessing safety, and prioritizing mainte­ nance actions (Ye et al., 2019). Furthermore, the technology supports real-time monitoring of structural movements, tracking deformations, displacements, and settlements under diverse loads, ultimately ensuring safe and efficient bridge operation (Hielscher et al., 2023). Specifically, the Augmented Reality (AR) technology has been viewed as an imple­ mentation framework for DT models and was explored in use in the context of bridge health monitoring (Mohammadkhorasani et al., 2023). Focusing on the Augmented Reality (AR) for maintenance opera­ tions, Palmarini et al. emphasize its role in administrative tasks, tech­ nical functions, and decision-making processes (Palmarini et al., 2018). Li et al., conducted an extensive review of the advantages of AR and Virtual Reality (VR) within the construction sector to identify the trend of utilizing computer vision algorithms for AR platforms, employing AR headsets as effective interfaces for image-based techniques in the realm of visualized field inspection (Li et al., 2018). Some scholars have underscored the benefits of the integration of AR with Artificial Intel­ ligence (AI) for the classification and quantification of structural dam­ age with impressive accuracy and in-situ visibility. Wang et al., integrated Deep Learning (DL) models with AR headsets to facilitate real-time detection of structural behaviour changes caused by factors such as corrosion or fatigue (Shaohan Wang et al., 2019). Malek and 2. Literature review 2.1. Advancement in bridge structural health monitoring Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems have experienced a tremendous transformation from the conventional bridge monitoring techniques which relied more on direct measurements of bridge response using the traditional sensors on the bridge (Wan et al., 2023; Premjeet et al.). These conventional methods involve direct assessment of structural health using visual inspection techniques or simple hand­ held devices like portable sensors (Washer et al., 2019; Elhattab and Uddin, 2018). These sensors, including Fiber Bragg Gratings (FBGs) and 2 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Moreu et al., studied the conceptual design of AR systems for structural inspection, assessing their capabilities in hologram generation and their impact on visual inspection, defect visualization, virtual measuring, and documentation tasks (Malek and Moreu, 2022). Thus, the DT of a bridge aided by the AR bridges the gap between digital and physical assets, enhancing visualization, real-time data analysis, and decision-making, especially in structural damage classification. (FEA), which yielded the bridge health monitoring system designed as a result of analysis parameters. It further helped to quantify the existing damage associated with the bridge for which the monitoring devices were installed on the bridge and bridge monitoring was carried out. The other domain involved the bridge 3D scanning which adopted the Scanto-BIM approach to develop the BIM reality model of the bridge. After this, both the domains were integrated to develop the DT model of the bridge SHM system which is further integrated with the AR to perform the AR-based DT of the bridge SHM system. 2.3. Knowledge gap 3.1. Component 1: Scan-to-BIM approach for BIM reality model development The state-of-the-art work underlines the challenges related to static data collection and processing. The Scan-to-BIM approach emerges as a transformative technique to automate the generation of the BIM reality models that enable real-time detection of structural irregularities, providing proactive data flows to bridge safety and reliability. On this basis, a fully integrated bridge digital twin model will be capable of automating processes of bridge monitoring, facilitating autonomous decision-making in proactive maintenance, as aided by real-time data collection from sensors and IoT technology. In addition, the AR imple­ mentation gives an insightful visualization of the developed DT model to assist bridge inspectors. Considering this missing knowledge in an in­ tegrated and holistic approach to bridge model updating, this study intends to develop the Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) to improve infrastructure management and monitoring and showcase its potential for running future infrastructure projects. To meet the research goals of Digital Twinning of the developed SHM system, a BIM reality model of the bridge is needed. In this research, the Scan-to-BIM approach is selected to achieve and automate this process. The Scan-to-BIM is a sophisticated procedure that uses state-of-the-art laser scanning technology that closely captures the details of a phys­ ical asset’s structural composition (Danklmaier, 2022). This points-based dataset is subsequently transformed into a high-fidelity digital 3D model, which is then subjected to further refinement, and processing to develop a comprehensive BIM reality model of a bridge (Meyer et al., 2022). The Scan-to-BIM process involves three steps explained in Fig. 2. 3. Methodology 3.2. Component 2: Development of Digital Twin model of SHM system using 3D game engines Deeply rooted in the capabilities and adaptability of Digital Twins for bridge health monitoring and their integration with AR, this research contributes to the ongoing evolution of efficient and proactive infra­ structure management practices. The proposed research framework is shown in Fig. 1, which is tested using a real-life concrete arch bridge. The major focus of this framework is the real asset, which in our case is the real-life bridge. Then two different domains were adopted in this research on this bridge. One of them is the Finite Element Analysis This research has used a novel gamification technique (using the 3D game engine, UNITY 3D) to develop the DT model of the SHM system. For this purpose, the BIM reality model of the bridge is used. The development of this DT involves several steps sequenced in Fig. 3. The first step of this process is the creation of a BIM-based sensory model that deploys the smart sensors to the BIM reality model of the bridge. This can be done on the UNITY platform. For this purpose, the BIM reality model of the bridge is exported to FBX format to directly Fig. 1. Holistic research framework for the IBDTP. 3 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Fig. 2. Steps of our BIM reality model updating process. Fig. 3. Technological workflows to develop IBDTP. import it to the 3D game engine. It is worth mentioning that the IFC formats or.rvt files, can also be used using third-party 3D animation apps but importing models with all the native properties makes them heavy, subject to data loss, and inefficient thus requiring some extra manual work to import all the design data. Therefore, direct import is preferred and recommended for this case. After importing the BIM reality model, the virtual replicas of all the sensors are developed at the exact locations that are physically installed on the real bridge. All these replicas virtu­ ally represent the actual sensors giving birth to the sensory model of the bridge. Each sensor in this gaming environment is developed with several functions, but the major focus of this research is the integration of these virtual sensors with real sensors. For this purpose, canvases (game en­ gine components used to develop gaming tools) are used to mesh (a digital tool that assigns functions to the subcomponents of canvas) the virtual model which develops the regenerative algorithms and links them with the sensory model. These meshes control the automation of the generated virtual elements and directly communicate with the web platform connected to the sensory model. To automate the connection between the sensory model and the canvas, a customizable C# script is developed in Visual Studio (VS) and then embedded in the canvas. This automatically starts the communication between the sensory model and the IoT web platform of the SHM system. Inside the canvas, a special function is generated to give clickable features to the IBDTP. This function is then embedded into the virtual replicas of the sensors enabling communication with the actual sensors. This way the whole virtual system is developed which communicates with the real SHM system automatically and performs its functions automatically. This study focused on the creation of DT for real-time monitoring, management, and visualization of the SHM data and the scope of automatic detection of bridge damage is not included in this study. 4. Practical illustration of the research – A case study of the Panewicka Concrete Arch Bridge in Poland 4.1. Description of the bridge structure The experimental phase of this research is planned over an arch bridge in Poland. The bridge is a single-span concrete arch facility with a two-directional traffic flow. The theoretical length of the bridge is 37.60 m, with a 0.30 m thick concrete deck slab. Two prestressed con­ crete girders are 9.72 m apart making the whole width of 13.68 m. Two concrete arches on each side of the bridge are connected to the deck slab through steel hangers. The detailed layout and span details are shown in Fig. 4. The choice of this bridge is critical for this research due to its distinctive design and inclusion of certain structural elements like deck, arches, and hangers. These elements make it an ideal subject for research, promising valuable insights on the design of the SHM system, installation of sensors, monitoring of the facility, and development of IBDTP. 4.2. FE Analysis of the bridge for the design of the SHM system Finite Element Analysis (FEA) analysis of the bridge is carried out to calculate internal forces and displacement. These parameters helped to design the SHM system of the bridge which provides a physical system for the development of the DT model. SHM system is designed according 4 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Fig. 4. Layout, span, and sectional details of the bridge. to the maximum valued location of these numerical parameters. To carry out the static linear analysis, a linear elastic model of the bridge is developed as a shell and linear element. The geometric char­ acteristics of the bridge deck are adopted in accordance with the ge­ ometry shown in Fig. 5. The modular geometry includes the bridge deck slab of C60/75 concrete, held by the edge girders on both sides of the deck slab. Similarly, diaphragms are also a part of bridge geometry that helps to resist the lateral forces and transfer loads to the support. The values of the torsional moment are calculated throughout the girder, for ease of managing the geometry of the structure. Further, the bridge structure includes concrete C60/75 arches on both sides of the bridge deck. These arches hold the bridge deck through tied steel hangers. The cross-sections of the hangers are reduced to a circular cross-section having a diameter resulting from the total cross-sectional area of the circular solid steel section. In the design, the calculation model takes the standard parameters of the concrete elasticity modulus into account, according to EC-2 (The European Union, 2004). The loading of the bridge is applied as per (PN-EN, “PN-EN, 1991–2, Fig. 5. FE model and used the geometry of the bridge. 5 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 2007), including self-weight, superimposed dead load, uniform tem­ perature load ranging from − 29 ◦ c to 31 ◦ c (range for the area), and vehicular load of 32 t (calculated for the heaviest vehicles passing over the bridge). The developed FE model of the bridge is shown in Fig. 5. several steps starting from setting up the laser scanner. In the case of the subject bridge, 26 locations were chosen to fully scan the bridge. Further, the survey points in the form of geodetic targets were also set up and measured with a tachymeter for cloud calibration. The major pre­ caution used in this method is to keep the sequence of 3D scans with certain overlapping areas. After each scan, the point clouds are config­ ured with the previously scanned area, and 3D overlapping is performed on the mobile/tablet device. The scans acquired from the scanner were then combined with UAV captures using the photogrammetry technique and were further processed using Reality Capture software to process and align the scanned data. It helped to create a coherent 3D model of the bridge (Geosystems, 2023b) as shown in Fig. 7. This model is available in various formats, with the e57 format being the most commonly used one. 4.3. Installation of SHM system and field data measurement The results of the Finite Element (FE) analysis presented in Section 4.5 are used to identify the prone zone needing the monitoring of nu­ merical parameters. For this monitoring, heavy-duty, robust IoT sensors are used in this research, which are provided by the industrial partner using real-world bridge projects. These sensors include the following devices: • FlatMesh 3 G Gateway: to communicate with the wireless sensors and Sencieve web monitor, • 1x FlatMesh Crack Sensor Node: for the measurement of longitudinal displacement, • 1x FlatMesh Tilt Meter Node: for the measurement of rotation angle showing the bridge rotation in 3-axis, • 1x FlatMesh Optical Displacement Sensor Node: for the measurement of vertical displacement and rotation at the center of the bridge deck. 4.4.1. Updating the Scan-to-BIM reality model Following the Scan-to-BIM methodology, the steps of constructing and updating the BIM reality model of the bridge are described below. Step 1: Scanning: The first step of the Scan-to-BIM procedure in­ volves the precise surveying of the bridge using a specialized laser scanner as described in Section 4.4 (Xiong et al., 2023). The laser scan emits laser beams and accurately captures the reflected signals, enabling the accurate determination of distances and spatial coordinates of sur­ face points. Subsequently, these collected data are transformed into a comprehensive 3D point cloud, representing the structural layout of the bridge under examination. These point clouds are then aligned to a common reference point, which is a fundamental prerequisite before proceeding to create a BIM reality model (Tang et al., 2022). Thus, bridge scanning was performed at 26 points and point clouds were developed from this scanned data. Step 2: Registration: The gathered scan data is then stored in a point cloud format, serving as a foundation for subsequent trans­ formations into 3D and BIM models. Common file formats for this pur­ pose include.e57 and.rcp files supported by Autodesk, widely recognized for their efficiency in exchanging laser scan data. Then, precise alignment of the point cloud data is carried out by linking and harmonizing data collected from various scanning sessions or different In addition to the listed sensors, a web-based monitoring system database was integrated to monitor and manage the SHM data. This web platform provides an extensive data storage capacity, allowing for the graphical representation of acquired data and facilitating the seamless extraction of data in any file format. All these sensors and the layout of the web monitor are shown in Fig. 6. 4.4. Component 1: Scan-to-BIM reality model development This research has used the Scan-to-BIM approach (discussed in detail in Section 3.1) to develop the BIM reality model of the bridge. For this purpose, a high-accuracy automated portable 3D laser scanner (Geosystems, 2023a) is used to capture bridge scans, including High-Dynamic Range (HDR) images. 3D scanning of the bridge involved Fig. 6. Wireless sensors and IoT-based web platform of the SHM of bridge. 6 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Fig. 7. The process of data acquisition and processing for generating a point cloud. scanning devices (Wang et al., 2022). Registration can be accomplished manually or with partial automation through specialized software. Manual registration involves using visual cues within the data to establish connections, while automated methods employ algorithms to automatically compare and register data based on geometric or textual features. In this research manual registration was performed as the dataset was not big enough to go for the automated methods. This step significantly laid the foundation of the resulting BIM reality model, ensuring the accuracy and fidelity of the final BIM reality model (Esfahani et al., 2021). Step 3: Modelling: Following the exportation and precise registra­ tion of data, the process of creating digital 3D and BIM models commenced. This phase is carried out using specialized computer-aided design (CAD) software, such as Revit or Archicad. The major task in­ volves exporting the point clouds into modeling software i.e., Autodesk Revit. For this purpose specialized software i.e., Autodesk Recap can be used which can directly convert point cloud file (.e57) into the .rcp file format, compatible with BIM modeling software. Then using the ground Fig. 8. Scan-to-BIM process and BIM reality model generation. 7 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 coordinates of the developed point clouds, different structural elements are drawn (Xue et al., 2019). This way accuracy of the developed BIM models can be ensured closer to reality (Bosché et al., 2015). The developed BIM reality model using the Scan-to-BIM approach can be known for its millimeter-accurate digital replication methodology and is an important tool for efficiently creating DT of existing bridges. The finalized BIM reality model developed using the Scan-to-BIM approach is shown as the BIM reality model in Fig. 8. Z directions accompanied by the temperature sensing device measuring a frequency of 30 minutes. Further, the LD sensor measured the vertical displacement of the deck accompanied by the measurement of rotation angles at the center of the span and the temperature. All the measure­ ments with the LD sensor are recorded at a frequency of 5 minutes. The complete details of these sensors are listed in Table 1. Initially, 20 days of data from the installed system was selected for processing. Following the data retrieval from the web platform, data fusion was performed using DataFusion in Python library which allows the data binding through DataFrame API against the data stored in the CSV files, and runs it in a multi-threaded environment, which helps to integrate the diverse sensor data, resulting in a more consistent, accu­ rate, and useful dataset (Krishnamurthi et al., 2020; Google cloud, 2023). Using this approach, the problem of different frequencies of the data was resolved and a convenient dataset was developed for further processing. This consolidated dataset was subsequently used to generate a time series graph for graphical interpretation. For the listed parame­ ters in Table 1, temperature and displacement measurements showed important trends detailed in Fig. 10. All three sensors were used to monitor the temperature variations at different locations of the bridge; thus, different temperature values can be observed in Graph 1 of Fig. 10. Notably, the maximum values of the temperature are recorded by the CM (crack meter) fluctuating between 11 ͦC to 34 ͦC indicating a temperature gradient exceeding 20 ͦC. Following this, the tilt meter recorded the temperature from 19 ͦC to 24 ͦC displaying relatively low temperature gradient whereas the laser displacement sensor recorded the lowest gradient of the temperature. This substantial temperature variation caused the sudden expansion and contraction along the bridge which can somehow be compromised by the concrete but not by the solid steel sections of the hangers, thus buckling is observed in the hangers mostly exposed to the sun. This measurement thus helped to identify the major bridge damage. In addition to temperature measurement, displacement results (Fig. 10b) also revealed some interesting results but did not affect the bridge’s health. The major variation can be observed in the vertical displacement measured by the laser displacement sensor which is 4.5. Component 2: Development of Digital Twin model of SHM system using 3D game engines 4.5.1. Design of SHM system based on FE analysis and data processing The FE analysis results helped to identify the maximum valued lo­ cations of longitudinal deflection, vertical deflection, and angular deflection of the bridge. As per these results, the expansion joint at support A is found to be the best-suited place for the installation of a Crack Meter (CM) because the expansion joint offers the maximum longitudinal moments. Further, the deflection diagram of the bridge is carefully observed to check for the rotation angles. The difference in rotation angles varies from constant negative to constant positive, with a sharp change at a distance of 0.5 m from the left bearing of support A, which can be observed as the potential location for the damage (McGeown et al., 2021), so the Tilt Meter (TM) is proposed to be installed at this location. For monitoring of the vertical displacement, the deflected shape of the bridge deck was observed, proposing that the Laser Displacement (LD) sensor should be installed at the center of the bridge deck. Additionally, temperature and humidity monitoring were also planned as the results of the FE analysis to show the critical de­ flections with a temperature gradient. Therefore, the monitoring devices mentioned in Section 4.3, are proposed at the mentioned location. The complete SHM plan along with these installed sensors is shown in Fig. 9. These sensors include the CM having built-in temperature measure­ ment devices, so it measured longitudinal displacement of the bridge deck along with the temperature at a frequency of 30 minutes. Similarly, the TM measured the rotation angles of the bridge deflection in X, Y, and Fig. 9. SHM system installed on the bridge. 8 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Table 1 Details of the installed sensors and their measurement parameters. Measurement Parameters Displacement [mm] ͦ Temperature [C] X-axis rotation [deg] Y-axis rotation [deg] Z-axis rotation [deg] Crack Meter (CM) Tilt Meter (TM) Parameter √ √ Measured Frequency [min] 30 30 Laser Displacement (LD) Parameter Measured Frequency [min] 30 30 30 30 √ √ √ √ Parameter √ √ √ √ √ Measured Frequency [min] 5 5 5 5 5 Fig. 10. Graphical representation of fusion data recorded by the SHM system. fluctuating between − 6 mm to 4 mm with an overall displacement of 10 mm, which is considerably lower than the Eurocode limits (Fawad et al., 2019) thus validating the safer functionality of the bridge. Like­ wise, longitudinal displacement recorded by the crack meter remained below 2 mm during the measurement period; thus, highlighting the safer bridge health in this criterion too. In addition to the temperature and displacement results, the rotation of the bridge deck did not reveal any significant threat to bridge health, thus not discussed here. In this way, the installed system provides a detailed overview of bridge health ensuring the safe functionality of the bridge. Based on the above-mentioned proposals and methodology defined in Section 3.2 the Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) is developed. The dashboard of IBDTP with different features and the realtime data visualization of the SHM data are shown in Fig. 11. Universal Window Platform (UWP). These computing platforms help to customize the applications that can run on the Windows system and AR platforms. DT model is used as the base 3D model of this application and all functions of DT model are imported as assets to this application. The real-time functionality of the application is developed using the virtual buttons as a connection between the virtual and real world. To import the actual reality, an AR development plugin is used (Vuforia) (Vuforia, 2023). This plugin enables its own camera to convert the DT model from the gaming environment to AR. So, when the user switches to the game mode, the AR application connects the virtual SHM system to the real SHM system which can be visualized in the AR in the gaming environment. 4.6.2. AR application deployment to AR headset After the development of the AR application, an important phase is to deploy this app successfully to the AR headset. For this purpose, the target device in UWP is selected as the HoloLens (HL) because Microsoft HoloLens 2nd generation is used in this research. Then the project is built as an application that generates a Visual Studio (VS) solution (.sln) file. This file is then used to open the project in VS and the system is paired with the HL device over the same Wi-Fi network. This step re­ quires turning on the developer mode of the HL device and retrieving a code. Adding the code in the VS project connects the system with the HL. After the IP address of the HL is added to the VS project for debugging, the application starts the deployment process. So, debugging of the 4.6. AR-based Digital Twinning of the SHM system For the purpose of developing immersive and interactive decisionmaking processes, an immersive technology application is developed that can be deployed to any AR headset for immersive operations. 4.6.1. AR application development After successfully testing the DT model in the 3D game engine, the development of the AR application is initiated by creating a UNITY project supplemented with Mixed Reality Tool Kit (MRKT) and 9 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 Fig. 11. Dashboard of DT model of bridge SHM system. application is started in VS which automatically starts the deployment of the application to the HL. After successful deployment, the DT model can be visualized in the app menu of the HL, where it can be operated independently. Fig. 12. DT model of bridge SHM system in Augmented Reality. 10 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 4.6.3. AR-based DT model testing The application was tested on the real-world bridge case project. Using the “Marker” option in the HL, the virtual model is placed over the physical model of the bridge. Due to such overlapping information, the initial discrepancies in the physical model are identified. In this project, stakeholders were able to identify the buckling of hangers, which showed diversion from the virtual model. When switching to the AR application in the HL, the virtual sensors were checked against the physical sensors. All the SHM devices were found to be attached to the bridge model at the same location where actual sensors were installed. In order to perform AR-based SHM, virtual sensors were implemented in AR and overlapped with the physical sensor. The DT model allows the communications between virtual and physical sensors. Clicking each sensor connects the virtual sensor with the web platform of the SHM system where the physical sensors continuously stored the bridge health data in real-time. Once the virtual sensor was activated, it showed the bridge health data in real-time and highlighted all the information monitored by the physical sensor. In this way, bridge inspectors can visualize the SHM data in a graphical format as shown in Fig. 12. As each monitoring parameter is set with certain threshold values (as per the Eurocode) and if any parameter exceeds the threshold value, it will be immediately identified in the AR-based dashboard views and immediate measures should be taken by the bridge inspectors. This data can be interpreted as per user requirements, which can be set in real-time. Data can also be stored in HL as a CSV file which can further be transferred to any workstation. This way a complete visuali­ zation of SHM data can be performed onsite or remotely and data can be shared with project partners over the Internet. The field demonstration includes running the app in the HL and visualizing data with just a click which popped up the sensor data in AR with the possibility of changing certain parameters as per the inspection’s requirement. The outcomes of the field demonstration and the implementation of the DT model using the AR application in an AR headset can be seen in Fig. 12. Thus the integration of both AR and DT technologies shows the po­ tential tools to facilitate the fusion of virtual and physical, which is a growing trend in the construction industry. Since SHM of bridges needs practical implementations of cutting-edge technologies like DT and AR, so, the automated SHM system in the immersive AR environment kickstarts this boom. Further, it can be observed that AR-enhanced DT of bridge SHM systems not only helps the real-time monitoring of bridge health but can also step towards the digitization of the bridge industry and across sector digital construction. This fusion of SHM, Scan-to-BIM, DT, and AR has turned the conceptual designs into a mature BIM framework that can push BIM implementation stages to a new level and reciprocate its applications. This can bring more unified and integrated applications of AR-based Digital Twinning into bridge engineering. (Geosystems, 2023a), which is used to capture bridge scans, including High-Dynamic Range (HDR) images. This way the BIM reality model is developed (Danklmaier, 2022) using the manual registration approach as the dataset was not big enough to go for the automated methods. After the development of the BIM reality model, the virtual sensors of the bridge SHM system are embedded in the BIM reality model to develop the virtual sensory model which connects the virtual system with the real system in real-time. This way the virtual system communicates with the real SHM system and performs its functions automatically giving birth to the DT of the bridge SHM system. The DT is then used to develop the AR application which is further deployed to the AR headset to perform bridge health monitoring in AR. For this purpose, an AR development plugin is used (Vuforia) (Vuforia, 2023). This plugin en­ ables its own camera to convert the DT model from the gaming envi­ ronment to AR. The developed AR application integrates both AR and DT technologies to showcase the potential to facilitate the fusion of virtual and physical assets, which will perform real-time automated SHM of the bridge in the immersive AR environment. 4.7. Discussions The application of BIM in bridge health assessment and monitoring has been up-graded to a new level of implementation due to its powerful integration with IoT sensors, augmented reality, and virtual reality. However, the integration of these technologies can be challenging for bridge projects considering a lack of interoperable and systematic platform approach. To address this challenge, this research integrates Scan-to-BIM, IoT sensors, and AR tools to revamp the current SHM system to enable real-time data management, automated data mining, and onsite visualization of SHM data in an immersive environment. This research develops the Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) that allows for improved data collection and model updating. The wireless sensors installed on bridge assets were seamlessly integrated with health monitoring and the real-time data was collected for 20 days on the subject bridge structure (Panewicka Concrete Arch Bridge in Poland) to enable infrastructure managers to identify the damages efficiently. To provide an immersive and interactive environment and enhance the experience of infrastructure managers, the model is trans­ formed into an AR application using the same platform and deployed to the AR headsets. 5. Managerial implications and recommendations The major challenge associated with this research is the limited capability of AR headsets (HoloLens). To date, the available headsets have a limited number of elements (< 10k) in the bridge management models that can be visualized in AR. In some cases of bridge assets, the number of elements modelled in the BIM software is much higher than this limit. This issue can be addressed in the proposed IBDTP where the bridge model is imported with the VR background, and therefore the whole structure acts as a single unit and individual elements are not counted in numbers to overcome this problem. Besides, there remains the issue of using HoloLens in bright sunlight which causes visualization problems during the daytime. To resolve this issue, it is recommended that stakeholders carry out field experimentation either during overcast weather conditions or close to sunset timings. The accuracy and reli­ ability of wireless sensors integrated with AR applications may also be affected by environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and vibration. Therefore, further research is needed to overcome these limitations and resolve interoperability issues among different model­ ling systems. Additional real-world case studies should be investigated to validate the potential of the proposed IBDTP and demonstrate the value of it. For example, the cost of implementing the AR-based SHM system needs to be investigated through various types of case studies with the proper implementation to provide practical implications on the net-benefits of its adoption. 6. Conclusion This research has implemented the proposed framework of an Immersive Bridge Digital Twin Platform (IBDTP) of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) system on a real-life bridge structure. The study uses the Finite Element (FE) analysis method to identify prone zones for monitoring bridge damages (Svendsen, 2021; Fawad et al., 2022), which helped to design the bridge monitoring system (Fawad et al., 2024). This system involved heavy-duty IoT sensors including FlatMesh 3 G Gateway, Crack Sensor Node, Tilt Meter Node, and Optical Displace­ ment Sensor Node used for monitoring longitudinal and vertical displacement, rotation angels of the bridge deck, and monitoring of bridge cracks. These IoT sensors help to connect the bridge monitoring parameters with the web-based platform which is further linked with the IBDTP (Fawad et al., 2023). This IoT-based web platform is linked with the BIM reality model of the bridge, developed using the Scan-to-BIM approach, to lay down the foundations for the development of IBDTP. The Scan-to-BIM approach involves the 3D laser scanning of the bridge using a high-accuracy automated portable 3D laser scanner 11 Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 M. Fawad et al. The proposed IBDTP not only serves as a base framework for the immersive Digital Twin of the bridge SHM system but also addresses the limitations associated with traditional SHM methods, particularly con­ cerning data management and the visualization of three-dimensional structural data. Moreover, it provides a comprehensive framework as a base to guide future practices of digital twining of infrastructure to enable proactive decision-making of infrastructure managers. Future research work and model testing will be conducted to resolve interop­ erability issues among different modelling systems and additional realworld case studies will be investigated to validate the potential of the proposed IBDTP, including a detailed comparison of the limitations and constraints of IBDTP applications in different types of building and infrastructure projects. Al-Nasar, M.K.R., Al-Zwainy, F.M.S., 2022. A systematic review of structural materials health monitoring system for girder-type bridges. Mater. Today Proc. vol. 49, A19–A28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.385. Ndinga Okina, S., Taillandier, F., Ahouet, L., Hoang, Q.A., Breysse, D., LouzoloKimbembe, P., 2023. Using Conceptual Graph modeling and inference to support the assessment and monitoring of bridge structural health. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. vol. 125 (June), 106665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106665. Alokita, S., et al., 2018. Recent advances and trends in structural health monitoring. Elsevier. García-Macías, E., Ubertini, F., 2022. Real-time Bayesian damage identification enabled by sparse PCE-Kriging meta-modelling for continuous SHM of large-scale civil engineering structures. J. Build. Eng. vol. 59 (March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jobe.2022.105004. Figueiredo E, B.J., 2022. Three decades of statistical pattern recognition paradigm for SHM of bridges. Struct. Heal. Monit. vol. 21 (6), 3018–3054. Sonbul, O.S., Rashid, M., 2023. Algorithms and techniques for the structural health monitoring of bridges: systematic literature review. Sensors vol. 23 (9), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094230. Deng, Z., Huang, M., Wan, N., Zhang, J., 2023. The current development of structural health monitoring for bridges: a review. Buildings vol. 13 (6). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/buildings13061360. Palma, V., et al., 2023. Innovative technologies for structural health monitoring of SFTs: proposal of combination of infrared thermography with mixed reality. J. Civ. Struct. Heal. Monit. (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00698-1. Omar, T., Nehdi, M.L., 2018. Condition assessment of reinforced concrete bridges: Current practice and research challenges. Infrastructures vol. 3 (3), 1–23. https:// doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures3030036. Vagnoli M, A.J., Remenyte-Prescott, R., 2018. Railway bridge structural health monitoring and fault detection: State-of-the-art methods and future challenges. Struct. Heal. Monit. vol. 17 (4), 971–1007. Fawad, M., et al., 2024. Integration of bridge health monitoring system with augmented reality application developed using 3D game engine – Case Study. IEEE Access vol. 12 (January), 16963–16974. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3358843. Mohammadkhorasani, A., et al., 2023. Augmented reality-computer vision combination for automatic fatigue crack detection and localization. Comput. Ind. vol. 149 (May), 103936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2023.103936. He, Z., Li, W., Salehi, H., Zhang, H., Zhou, H., Jiao, P., 2022a. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. vol. 136 (August 2021), 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104168. Chen, Q., Garcia de Soto, B., Adey, B.T., 2018. Construction automation: Research areas, industry concerns and suggestions for advancement. Autom. Constr. 94, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.028. Chen, Q., Adey, B.T., Haas, C.T., Hall, D.M., 2020. Using look-ahead plans to improve material flow processes on construction projects when using BIM and RFID technologies. Constr. Innov. 20 (3), 471–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-20190133. Fawad, M., et al., 2023. Automation of structural health monitoring (SHM) system of a bridge using BIMification approach and BIM-based finite element model development. Sci. Rep. vol. 13 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-02340355-7. Allegra, V., Di Paola, F., Lo Brutto, M., Vinci, C., 2020. SCAN-TO-BIM for the management of heritage buildings: the case study of the CASTLE of MAREDOLCE (PALERMO, ITALY). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. - ISPRS Arch. vol. 43 (B2), 1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B22020-1355-2020. Qiu, Q., Wang, M., Guo, J., Liu, Z., Wang, Q., 2022. An adaptive down-sampling method of laser scan data for scan-to-BIM. Autom. Constr. vol. 135 (November 2021), 104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104135. Tang, S., Li, X., Zheng, X., Wu, B., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., 2022. BIM generation from 3D point clouds by combining 3D deep learning and improved morphological approach. Autom. Constr. vol. 141 (December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2022.104422. Bosché, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C.T., Haas, R., 2015. The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components. Autom. Constr. vol. 49, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014. Zhao, J., Feng, H., Chen, Q., Garica de Soto G, B., 2022. Developing a conceptual framework for the application of digital twin technologies to revamp building operation and maintenance processes. J. Build. Eng. 49, 104028. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104028. Meyer, T., Brunn, A., Stilla, U., 2022. Change detection for indoor construction progress monitoring based on BIM, point clouds and uncertainties. Autom. Constr. vol. 141 (February), 104442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104442. Zhang, H., Zhu, Y., Xiong, W., Cai, C.S., 2023. Point cloud registration methods for longspan bridge spatial deformation monitoring using terrestrial laser scanning. Struct. Control Heal. Monit. vol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2629418. Sadhu, A., Peplinski, J.E., Mohammadkhorasani, A., Moreu, F., 2023. A review of data management and visualization techniques for structural health monitoring using BIM and virtual or augmented reality. Journal of Structural Engineering 149 (1), 03122006. Gao, Y., Li, H., Xiong, G., Song, H., 2023. AIoT-informed digital twin communication for bridge maintenance. Autom. Constr. vol. 150 (February), 104835. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104835. Wan, S., Guan, S., Tang, Y., 2023. Advancing bridge structural health monitoring: insights into knowledge-driven and data-driven approaches. J. Data Sci. Intell. Syst. vol. 00 (July), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewjdsis3202964. Author statement and contributions We declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process and is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. CRediT authorship contribution statement Marcin Jasinski: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization. Piotr Lazinski: Writing – review & editing, Inves­ tigation, Conceptualization. Kalman Koris: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization. Dawid Piotrowski: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Conceptualization. Qian Chen: Writing – re­ view & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization. Mateusz Uscilowski: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Investigation, Formal anal­ ysis, Conceptualization. Muhammad Fawad: Writing – review & edit­ ing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Marek Salamak: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Data availability Data will be made available on request. References Zhou, Y., Sun, L., 2019. Effects of environmental and operational actions on the modal frequency variations of a sea-crossing bridge: A periodicity perspective. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. vol. 131, 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.063. Zumstein, M., Chen, Q., Adey, B.T., Hall, D.M., 2022. A preliminary investigation of the potential benefits of using the ASTRA Bridge for short-span bridge deck refurbishment projects in Switzerland. Struct. Infra Eng. 1–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15732479.2022.2152842. Fawad, M., Kalman, K., Khushnood, R.A., Usman, M., 2019. Retrofitting of damaged reinforced concrete bridge structure. Procedia Struct. Integr. vol. 18, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.153. Kaloop, M.R., Eldiasty, M., Hu, J.W., 2022. Safety and reliability evaluations of bridge behaviors under ambient truck loads through structural health monitoring and identification model approaches. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. vol. 187 (July 2021), 110234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110234. 12 M. Fawad et al. Computers in Industry 164 (2025) 104189 S. Premjeet, M. Shivank, and S. Ayan, “Recent Advancements and Future Trends in Indirect Bridge Health Monitoring,” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. ASCE Libr., vol. 28, no. 1, 22AD, doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1259. Washer, G., , 2019. Guidelines to Improve the Quality of Element-Level Bridge Inspection Data. 2019. Elhattab, A., Uddin, N., 2018. Bridge monitoring utilizing handheld devices. Wirel. Commun. Technol. vol. 2 (1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18063/wct.v2i1.471. Zhang, G.Q., Wang, B., Li, J., Xu, Y.L., 2022. The application of deep learning in bridge health monitoring: a literature review. Adv. Bridg. Eng. vol. 3 (1). https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s43251-022-00078-7. Vegas, S.T., 2021. A literature review of non-contact tools and methods in structural health monitoring. Eng. Technol. Open Access J. vol. 4 (1). https://doi.org/ 10.19080/etoaj.2021.04.555626. Chen, Z., Zhou, X., Wang, X., Dong, L., Qian, Y., 2017. Deployment of a smart structural health monitoring system for long-span arch bridges: A review and a case study. Sens. (Switz. ) vol. 17 (9). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092151. He, Z., Li, W., Salehi, H., Zhang, H., Zhou, H., Jiao, P., 2022b. Integrated structural health monitoring in bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. vol. 136 (February), 104168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104168. Nassereddine, H., Hanna, A.S., Veeramani, D., Lotfallah, W., 2022. Augmented reality in the construction industry: use-cases, benefits, obstacles, and future trends. Front. Built Environ. vol. 8 (April), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.730094. Dong C-Z, C.F., 2021. A review of computer vision–based structural health monitoring at local and global levels. Struct. Heal. Monit. vol. 20 (2), 692–743. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1475921720935585. Moreu, F., Bleck, B., Vemuganti, S., Rogers, D., Mascarenas, D., 2017. Augmented reality tools for enhanced structural inspection. Struct. Heal. Monit. 2017 Real. -Time Mater. State Aware. Data-Driven Saf. Assur. - Proc. 11th Int. Work. Struct. Heal. Monit. IWSHM 2017 vol. 2 (June 2018), 3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.12783/ shm2017/14221. Yogeeswaran, K., Chen, Q., de Soto, B.García, 2023. Utilizing augmented reality for the assembly and disassembly of panelized construction. J. Info Tech. Constr. 28. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2023.030. Awadallah, O., Sadhu, A., 2023. Automated multiclass structural damage detection and quantification using augmented reality. J. Infrastruct. Intell. Resil. vol. 2 (1), 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2022.100024. Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., Xie, H.S., Girolami, M., 2020. Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centr Eng. vol. 1 (6). https://doi.org/10.1017/ dce.2020.16. Honghong, S., Gang, Y., Haijiang, L., Tian, Z., Annan, J., 2023. Digital twin enhanced BIM to shape full life cycle digital transformation for bridge engineering. Autom. Constr. vol. 147 (January), 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2022.104736. C. Ye, “A digital twin of bridges for structural health monitoring, in: Structural Health Monitoring 2019: Enabling Intelligent Life-Cycle Health Management for Industry Internet of Things (IIOT) -,” in - Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, 2020, pp. 1619–1626, doi: https://doi.org/10.12783/ shm2019/32287. Hielscher, T., Khalil, S., Virgona, N., Hadigheh, S.A., 2023. A neural network based digital twin model for the structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete bridges. Structures vol. 57 (February), 105248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. istruc.2023.105248. Palmarini, R., Erkoyuncu, J.A., Roy, R., Torabmostaedi, H., 2018. A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. vol. 49 (March 2017), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2017.06.002. Li, X., Yi, W., Chi, H.L., Wang, X., Chan, A.P.C., 2018. A critical review of virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR) applications in construction safety. Autom. Constr. vol. 86 (November 2017), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.11.003. Wang, S., Zargar, S. A., Xu, C., & Yuan, F. G. (2019). An efficient augmented reality (AR) system for enhanced visual inspection. In 12th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring: Enabling Intelligent Life-Cycle Health Management for Industry Internet of Things (IIOT), IWSHM 2019 (pp. 1543-1550). DEStech Publications Inc. Malek, K., Moreu, F., 2022. Realtime conversion of cracks from pixel to engineering scale using Augmented Reality. ” Autom. Constr. vol. 143, 104542. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104542. Michael Danklmaier, “From Physical to Digital: The Scan-to-BIM Process,” 〈www.miviso. com〉. 2022, [Online]. Available: 〈https://www.miviso.com/post/from-physical-todigital-scan-to-bim-process〉. The European Union, “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures,” EN 1992-1-1:2004, vol. 1, no. 2004. 2004. PN-EN, “PN-EN 1991-2: 2007 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Part 2. Moving loads on bridges.,” Eurocode 1. 2007. Leica Geosystems, “Leica RTC360 3D Laser Scanner,” 3D laser scanning, 2023a. 〈https ://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/scanners/leica-rtc360〉. Leica Geosystems, “Leica Cyclone FIELD 360,” Automatically pre-register and align scans directly in the field, 2023b. 〈https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanne rs/software/leica-cyclone/leica-cyclone-field-360〉. Xiong, B., Jin, Y., Li, F., Chen, Y., Zou, Y., Zhou, Z., 2023. Knowledge-driven inference for automatic reconstruction of indoor detailed as-built BIMs from laser scanning data. Autom. Constr. vol. 156 (February), 105097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. autcon.2023.105097. Wang, Q., Li, J., Tang, X., Zhang, X., 2022. How data quality affects model quality in scan-to-BIM: A case study of MEP scenes. Autom. Constr. vol. 144 (September), 104598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104598. Esfahani, M.E., Rausch, C., Sharif, M.M., Chen, Q., Haas, C., Adey, B.T., 2021. Quantitative investigation on the accuracy and precision of Scan-to-BIM under different modelling scenarios. Autom. Constr. vol. 126, 103686. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103686. Xue, F., Lu, W., Chen, K., Webster, C.J., 2019. BIM reconstruction from 3D point clouds: A semantic registration approach based on multimodal optimization and architectural design knowledge. Adv. Eng. Inform. vol. 42 (August), 100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100965. McGeown, C., Huseynov, F., Hester, D., McGetrick, P., Obrien, E.J., Pakrashi, V., 2021. Using measured rotation on a beam to detect changes in its structural condition. J. Struct. Integr. Maint. vol. 6 (3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 24705314.2021.1906092. Krishnamurthi, R., Kumar, A., Gopinathan, D., Nayyar, A., Qureshi, B., 2020. An overview of IoT sensor data processing, fusion, and analysis techniques. Sens. (Switz. ) vol. 20 (21), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216076. Google cloud, “Python Client for Cloud Data Fusion,” Python Client for Cloud Data Fusion, 2023. 〈https://cloud.google.com/python/docs/reference/datafusion/latest〉. Vuforia, “Vuforia Engine in Unity,” Vuforia devloper library, 2023. 〈https://library.vuf oria.com/getting-started/getting-started-vuforia-engine-unity〉. B.T. Svendsen, Numerical and experimental studies for damage detection and structural health monitoring of steel bridges. 2021. Fawad, M., Koris, K., Salamak, M., Gerges, M., Bednarski, L., Sienko, R., 2022. Nonlinear modelling of a bridge: A case study-based damage evaluation and proposal of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) system. Arch. Civ. Eng. vol. 68 (3), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2022.141903. 13
Puede agregar este documento a su colección de estudio (s)
Iniciar sesión Disponible sólo para usuarios autorizadosPuede agregar este documento a su lista guardada
Iniciar sesión Disponible sólo para usuarios autorizados(Para quejas, use otra forma )