Subido por miguelraya09

Journal Phytopathology 2011

Anuncio
J Phytopathol 159:377–381 (2011)
2010 Blackwell Verlag GmbH
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01776.x
Colegio de Postgraduados, Instituto de Fitosanidad, Texcoco, Me´xico
Leaf Stripe and Stem Rot Caused by Burkholderia gladioli, a New Maize Disease
in Mexico
Adriana
driana Gijon
ijon-Hernandez
ernandez1, Daniel
aniel Teliz
eliz-Ortiz
rtiz1, Dimas
imas Mejia
ejia-Sanchez
anchez2, Rodolfo
odolfo De
e La
a Torre
orre-Almaraz
lmaraz3,
Elizabeth
lizabeth Cardenas
ardenas-Soriano
oriano1, Carlos
arlos De
e Leon
eon1 and Antonio
ntonio Mora
ora-Aguilera
guilera1
AuthorsÕ addresses: 1Colegio de Postgraduados, Instituto de Fitosanidad, Texcoco, México, 2Departamento de Parasitologia
Agricola, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Texcoco, Mexico, 3UNAM, UBIPRO, FES Iztacala, Mexico (correspondence to
D. Teliz-Ortiz. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected])
Received July 17, 2009; accepted October 31 2010
Keywords: Zea mays, PCR, bacterial disease
Abstract
A disease in maize plants, not previously observed,
appeared in 2003–2004 in Cosoleacaque, Tlalixcoyan
and Paso de Ovejas counties, in the state of Veracruz,
Mexico. Initial symptoms on leaves were small whiteyellow watery spots, which coalesced into dry necrotic
stripes 0.3 wide and up to 8 cm long. Reddening sometimes developed on these leaves. Stems developed a rot
in the crown. The flag leaf became rot and necrotic at
the base, rolled inwards and dried out. Necrosis developed at the base of the corn ears and their growth was
inhibited. These symptoms were initially observed in
Asgrow-7573 commercial maize plantings. A bacterium
characterized by white colonies, gram negative, aerobic, rod-shape, opaque, round colonies with entire
margins on casaaminoacid peptone and glucose media
was consistently isolated from diseased maize plants.
On KingÕs Medium B, the isolates produced yellow,
non-mucoid colonies, with the majority of the strains
secreting a diffusible yellow pigment into the media.
The bacterium identity was confirmed by PCR amplification and sequencing of 16S and 23S genes rDNA
fragments. The bacterium was identified as Burkholderia gladioli. Its pathogenicity on maize plants in
Mexico is a new record.
Introduction
Stem, root and corn ear rots, leaf spots, wilt, blight
and stunt are registered maize diseases (De Leon 1984;
Quiroga 1995). The most important and common
maize bacterial diseases are bacterial wilt (Pantoea stewartii, syn. Erwinia stewartii) and stem rot (Erwinia
chrysanthemi pv. zeae, syn. E. carotovora f. sp. zeae)
(Shurtleff 1980; De Leon 1984; Quiroga 1995). A disease, not previously described in maize, was observed
during 2003–2004 in three important maize producing
counties (Paso de Ovejas, Cosoleacaque and Tlalixcoyan) in the State of Veracruz, Mexico, planted with
the var. Asgrow-7573, reducing yields from 30 to 70%
(Chavero 2004). Several probable aetiological agents
were proposed: sugarcane mosaic potyvirus, a geminivirus, corn stunt phytoplasm (Alcantara-Mendoza et al.
2010) and the bacterium Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans
(Chavero 2004). Due to the recent introduction and
socioeconomic importance of this disease, the objective
of the present work was to determine the causal agent.
Materials and Methods
Isolation and identification of the pathogen
A total of 480 Asgrow 75–73 maize samples were collected in the counties of Cosoleacaque, Tlalixcoyan
and Paso de Ovejas, during 2005–2007. Small pieces
of symptomatic leaves and stems were cut from the
margins of the advancing lesion, disinfested with 1%
sodium hypochlorite for one minute and rinsed three
times with sterile distilled water. Disinfested pieces
were placed in sterile tubes with 10-ml sterile distilled
water for 10 min, and the suspension was streaked on
Petri plates containing casaaminoacid peptone and
glucose (CPG), KingÕs Medium B (KB) and nutrient
agar (NA) (Schaad et al. 2001). Plates were incubated
at 28C for 72 h. Individual bacterial colonies were
purified and stored at )80C in 15% aqueous
glycerol. For all isolates, Gram reactions were determined by the lysis of bacteria in 3% KOH (Gregersen
1978). Cytochrome C oxidase was tested according to
Kovacs (1956). Oxidative or fermentation metabolism
was evaluated (Schaad et al. 2001). All strains
were initially identified based on the Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria (Schaad et al.
2001).
Pathogenicity tests
From the 480 leaf and stem samples, 240 bacterial cultures similar in morphology were obtained, from which
10 were selected for characterization and pathogenicity
Gijon-Hernandez et al.
378
tests. Thirty healthy 45-day-old maize AS-7573 seedlings were syringe inoculated at the base of the stem
with a 1 · 107 CFU⁄ml bacterial suspension. The inoculum was obtained from a bacterial pure culture
grown at 30C for 48 h in KB, resuspended in 100 ml
m NaCl, 2.7 mm
m of
of a sterile phosphate buffer (137 mm
m de KH2PO4, pH 7.4).
KCl, 0.01 m Na2HPO4, 1.8 mm
Sterile phosphate buffer was used for control inoculations. The inoculated maize seedlings were covered
with plastic bags and kept in a greenhouse (25–30C;
80% HR, with natural light). Symptoms development
was followed for 45 days, and the bacteria were reisolated onto KB medium.
Hypersensitivity reaction on tobacco plants
A 107 CFU⁄ml bacterial suspension was infiltrated in
the main vein of tobacco leaves (Nicotiana tabacum
var. xhanti) and kept at 28C for 24 h. Control leaves
were infiltrated with sterile distilled water.
Sequencing 16S rDNA
DNA was extracted from the selected bacterial colonies
and from the diseased plant material with the Plant
DNAZol (Invitrogen life technologies, Carlsbad, CA,
USA) commercial protocol. The universal bacterial
primers used were forward primer FD1 Eubacteria
(5¢-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3¢) that corresponds to position 8–28 of the Escherichia coli 16S
rRNA sequence, and the reverse primer RD1 Eubacteria (5¢-AAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3¢) that corresponds to position 1526–1542 of Xylella fastidiosa gyrB
gen (Rodrigues et al. 2003). DNA was amplified with
m of each primer, 200 lm
m dNTP, 1· PCR
25 ll of 0.2 lm
m MgCl2, 2 U Taq polymerase (Invitrobuffer, 1.5 mm
gen) and 10 ng of genomic DNA. PCR consisted of an
initial denaturation at 94C for 3 min; followed of 30
cycles of 94C for 1 min, 55C for 30 s and 72C for
3 min, with a final extension at 72C for 7 min. A 10-ll
aliquot was analysed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel (Promega) at 80 V for 90 min in TBE buffer.
Gels were stained with ethidium bromide. A 100-Pb ladder (Invitrogen Co.) was used as a size marker. DNA
was sequenced in a Genetic Analyzer 3100 (Applied
Biosystem Corp., Foster city, CA, USA). Sequences
data were aligned, and homology was determined using
the National Center for Biotechnology Information
Blast Network Server (Altschul et al. 1990).
Genus identification by PCR
Identification was confirmed using the pair of primers RHG-F (5¢-GGGATTCATTTCCTTAGTAAC-3¢),
which corresponds to position 835–851 16S rDNA
sequence and RHG-R (5¢-GCGATTACTAGCGATTC
CAGC-3¢) which corresponds to position 1324–1345
16S rDNA (LiPuma et al. 1999). Amplification was
m of each primer,
initiated in 25 ll containing 0.2 lm
m dNTP, 1· PCR buffer, 1.5 mm
m MgCl2, 2 U
200 lm
Taq polymerase (Invitrogen Co.) and 10 ng of genomic
DNA. Amplification initiated with denaturation at
95C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles at 94C for
1 min, 55C for 30 s and 72C for 2 min; with a final
extension at 72C for 7 min. All amplified products
were visualized by electrophoresis as previously mentioned. A multiple sequence alignment was constructed
using clustal x (Conway Inst., UCD Dublin,
Ireland). A phylogenetic tree was constructed with the
neighbour-joining method from the 16S rDNA
sequences, with 10 000 bootstrap repetitions with
mega 4 software (Tamura et al. 2007).
PCR species specifics
The identification of Burkholderia gladioli was confirmed with the pair of primers LP1 (5¢-GGGGGGTC
CATTGCG-3¢), which corresponds to position 872–
886, and LP4 (5¢-AGAAGCTCGCGCCACG-3¢) whose
position is 1523–1508, directed towards a specific
region in the rRNA 23S gene (Whitby et al. 2000).
m of
Amplification was made with 25 ll containing 0.2 lm
m dNTP, 1· buffer, 1.5 mm
m MgCl2,
each primer, 200 lm
2 U Taq polymerase and 10 ng of genomic DNA.
Amplification initiated with denaturation at 95C for
3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94C for 1 min, 55C for
30 s and 72C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72C
for 7 min. All amplified products were visualized by
electrophoresis as previously mentioned.
RFLPs
Ten microlitres of the PCR product was digested with
HaeIII (Roche), Taq1 and ApaI (Fermentas)
enzymes in a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems 2720),
with the following programme: HaeIII and ApaI at
37C for 20 h and Taq1 at 65C for 20 h. Digested
products were analysed in a 2% agarose gel.
Results
Field sampling
Initial symptoms on leaves were small white-yellow
watery spots which coalesced into dry necrotic stripes
0.3 wide and up to 8 cm long. Stems developed a soft
rot in the crown. The flag leaf became rot and necrotic
at the base, rolled inwards and dried out. The base of
the corn ears was necrotic and did not grow.
Isolation and identification of the pathogen
From the 480 Asgrow-7573 maize plants collected in
the field, 240 yielded a bacterial colony with similar
morphology in KB, NA and CPG media. An aerobic,
bacillary, gram negative, white bacterium was constantly isolated from the symptomatic plants; the colonies were white, convex, with smooth edges, humid,
opaque, and with a yellow diffusible pigment in KB
medium. All bacterial colonies had a negative oxidase
reaction, grew at pH 4.0 and utilized glucose, mannitol, arabinose, threalose, xylose, sucrose, cellobiose
and sorbitol but not l-rhamnose nor maltose. None of
the strains produced indol. Starch hydrolysis, levan,
gelatin liquefaction and nitrate reduction were positive.
Based on the morphology, physiology and biochemical
characterization, the 10 selected cultures were identified as B. gladioli (Schaad et al. 2001).
Maize Leaf Stripe and Stem Rot Caused by B. gladioli
Pathogenicity tests
The 30 inoculated AS-7573 maize plants infiltrated
with the bacteria in the greenhouse developed symptoms similar to those observed in the field. Symptoms
on leaves appeared 8 h after inoculation as soft, whiteyellow spots (Fig. 1a). These spots coalesced into 0.3
by 8-cm necrotic stripes (Fig. 1b), and some leaves
developed a reddish colour. A soft rot and necrosis
developed in the crown of the stem (Fig. 1c). The stem
became necrotic (Fig. 1d), The flag leaf developed a
rot and necrosis at the base, rolled inwards and dried
out (Fig. 1e). The base of the corn ear became necrotic
and did not grow (Fig. 1f). Control plants remained
healthy. KochÕs postulates were fulfilled with the reisolation and identification of the bacteria from the
inoculated tissues.
The bacteria isolated from the maize plants were
positive for the hypersensitivity reaction in tobacco
leaves; 24 h after infiltrating the main vein, wilting and
necrosis developed in the whole leaf (Fig. 2).
Sequencing 16S rDNA
All bacterial isolates generated a product of approximately 1600 bp when amplified by PCR with FD1 and
RD1 primers, which amplify the 16S rDNA gene (data
not shown). blast analysis of the 10 16S rDNA
sequences aligned with B. gladioli.
Genus identification by PCR
The confirmation of the genus Burkholderia was made
with the specific primers (LiPuma et al. 1999), amplifying a fragment of approximately 500 bp. The identity
of the isolates was confirmed by sequence alignment
(a)
(d)
Fig. 1 (a) Maize leaves with initial
symptoms of Burkholderia gladioli
as white-yellow spots. (b) Stripes
on leaves. (c) Soft rot of the stem
crown. (d) Stem necrosis. (e)
Inward rolling and necrosis of the
flag leaf. (f) Maize corn ear with
necrosis and inhibited growth
379
using clustal w and Megaling of the DNstar program. Partial 16S rDNA sequences of the 10 suspected
Burkholderia strains were obtained and deposited into
the GenBank database with accession numbers
EU161873 to EU161893. There was 100% similarity
between isolates from the three counties and 99% similarity with B. gladioli sequences from the Genbank.
The phylogenetic trees generated with the 16S RNA
sequences indicated a high homology, despite that the
isolates were from three counties. There was no amplification with a strain of Xanthomonas campestris pv.
vesicatoria used as negative control (Fig. 3).
Species specifics PCR
The identity of the isolated bacterial strains was also
confirmed using B. gladioli-specific PCR (Whitby et al.
2000). An approximately 700-bp amplified fragment of
the 23S rRNA gene was obtained for all B. gladioli
strains tested (Fig. 4). No amplified fragment was
observed with the Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strain used as negative control. The analysis of
16S rDNA and 23S rRNA with universal primers for
genus and species confirmed the morphological, physiological and biochemical results and indicated the
identity of the bacterial isolations as B. gladioli.
RFLPs
The amplification products digested with HaeIII
enzyme gave fragments of 150, 350, 400 and 500 bp.
Taq1 generated three fragments of 150, 300 and
350 bp, while ApaI did not show any restriction cut
(data not shown). The restriction fragments originated
by the three enzymatic digestions were the same for all
(c)
(b)
(e)
(f)
Gijon-Hernandez et al.
380
M 1
2 3
4
5
6 7 8 9 10 11 M
Fig. 4 Amplification of the 700-bp product from the 23 rDNA gene
of Burkholderia gladioli. Lane 1–10 with the 10 selected strains of
B. gladioli isolated from maize. Lane 11, Xanthomonas campestris pv.
vesicatoria as negative control. M = Invitrogen 1-Kb DNA ladder
and 100 bp DNA ladder (left)
Fig. 2 Hypersensitive necrosis caused by Burkholderia gladioli on
tobacco leaves: necrosis developed in the whole leaf
M 1 2 3
4
5 6 7
8 9 10 11
Fig. 3 Amplification of the 500-bp product from the 16S rDNA gene
of Burkholderia. Lane 1–10 with the 10 selected strains of Burkholderia isolated from maize. Lane 11, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria as negative control. M = Invitrogen 100 bp DNA ladder
the bacterial strains tested, which indicates the possibility that the enzyme cutting sites are related with
conserved regions for 16S rDNA.
Discussion
This new disease appeared in maize plantings of the
var Asgrow 7573 in 2003–2004 in Tlalixcoyan, Cosoleacaque and Paso de Ovejas counties, in the State of
Veracruz, México. Asgrow-7573 is still the only variety
grown in that area; growers prefer it for its short cycle.
A bacterial strain was constantly isolated from the
symptomatic maize tissues which grew as white, convex colonies with smooth margins, humid, bright, and
with a yellow diffusible pigment in KB medium.
KochÕs postulates were fulfilled with 10 pure cultures,
and symptoms on inoculated maize plants were identical to those observed in the field (Fig. 1a–f). The 10
strains were very virulent when inoculated on maize
and tobacco plants. Symptoms on inoculated maize
leaves appeared as early as 8 h after inoculation as
soft, white-yellow spots. Tobacco leaves developed
wilting and necrosis of the whole leaf when infiltrated
area mid vein.
16S rDNA analysis with universal primers and the
partial sequence of that region confirm the biochemical
and physiological studies. Using primers suggested by
LiPuma et al. 1999 resulted in a 100% similarity with
all of our B. gladioli tested strains and 99% similarity
with B. gladioli from the GenBank. The final confirmation as B. gladioli is supported by the 23S rDNA analysis with LP1 and LP4 primers (Whitby et al. 2000).
Burkholderia gladioli had not been previously reported
in maize in Mexico, and the symptoms caused had not
been observed before. The State of Veracruz grows
mostly rice, sorghum and sugar cane, which could also
become infected because they are hosts of B. gladioli.
The phylogenetic analysis and the use of restriction
enzymes did not show variability between isolates from
the three sampled counties, which suggests that this
bacterium was not present in Mexico and that it was
recently introduced in infected seeds, possibly from a
single source. Yield losses caused by this disease have
decreased from 30 to 70% in 2003–2004 to approximately 1% in 2007.
Burkholderia gladioli causes disease in both humans
[cystic fibrosis in pulmonary infections in hospitalassociated infections (Stoyanova et al. 2007); granulomatous disease in respiratory tracts and bacteremia
and sterile wound infections in lung transplant
patients (http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/reprint/114/2/
658.pdf)] and plants notably causing rot of gladiolus
corms (McCulloch 1921). Its pathogenicity on maize
plants in Mexico is a new record.
Maize Leaf Stripe and Stem Rot Caused by B. gladioli
Acknowledgements
Authors express their appreciation to Dr. Laura Ongay, Unidad de
Biologia Molecular del Instituto de Fisiologia Celular, UNAM,
Mexico, where DNA sequence was made.
References
Alcantara-Mendoza S, Teliz-Ortiz D, De Leon C, Cardenas-Soriano
E, Hernandez-Anguiano AM, Mejia-Sanchez D, De la TorreAlmaraz R. (2010) Detection and evaluation of Maize bushy stunt
phytoplasma in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Rev Mex Fitopatol
28:34–43.
Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, LiPuma DJ. (1990) Basic
local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.
Chavero JJ (2004) Control quı´mico in vitro de la bacteriosis del
maı́z (Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans). Texcoco, Mexico, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Depart Fitotecnia, Bachelor Thesis,
pp 75.
De Leon C. (1984) Enfermedades del Maı´z. Una Guı́a para su Identificación en el Campo. Centro Intern. de mejoramiento de maı́z y
trigo, CIMMYT, 3rd ed, pp 114.
Gregersen T. (1978) Rapid method for distinction of gram-negative
from gram-positive bacteria. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
5:123–127.
Kovacs N. (1956) Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the
oxidase reaction. Nature 178:703.
LiPuma JJ, Dulaney B, Mcmenamin JD, Whitby PW, Stull TL,
Coenye T, Bandammen P. (1999) Development of rRNA-based
381
PCR assays for identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex
isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol
37:3167–3170.
McCulloch L. (1921) A bacterial disease of gladiolus. Science
54:115–116.
Quiroga M. (1995) Enfermedades del Maı´z en Algunas Regiones Tropicales de Me´xico, con Énfasis en el Estado de Chiapas. Chiapas,
Mexico, Univ. Aut. Chiapas, pp 116.
Rodrigues J, Silva-Stenico M, Gomes J, Lopes J, Tsai S. (2003)
Detection and diversity assessment of Xylella fastidiosa in fieldcollected plant and insect samples by using 16S rRNA and gyrB
secuence. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4249–4255.
Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W. (2001) Laboratory Guide for
Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 3rd edn. St Paul, MN,
APS Press, pp 373.
Shurtleff MC. (1980) Compendium of Corn Diseases, 2nd edn. St.
Paul, MN, USA, APS Press, pp 105.
Stoyanova M, Pavlina I, Moncheva P, Bogatzevska N. (2007) Biodiversity and incidence of Burkholderia species. Biotechnol Biotechnol
Equip 47:306–310.
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. (2007) Mega 4 molecular
evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol
Biol Evol 24:1596–1599.
Whitby PW, Pope LC, Carter KB, LiPuma JJ, Stull TL. (2000)
Species specific PCR as a tool for the identification of Burkholderia
gladioli. J Clin Microbiol 38:282–285.
Descargar