Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/molmut Community address: www.elsevier.com/locate/mutres Role of PPAR-gamma in inflammation. Prospects for therapeutic intervention by food components夽 Harry Martin ∗ The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Keywords: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR␥) Inflammatory disease Diet a b s t r a c t Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPAR␥) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor and a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Acting as sensors of hormones, vitamins, endogenous metabolites and xenobiotic compounds, the nuclear receptors control the expression of a very large number of genes. PPAR␥ has been known for some time to regulate adipocyte differentiation, fatty acid storage and glucose metabolism, and is a target of anti-diabetic drugs. More recently, PPAR␥ has been recognized as playing a fundamentally important role in the immune response through its ability to inhibit the expression of inflammatory cytokines and to direct the differentiation of immune cells towards anti-inflammatory phenotypes. A feature of PPAR␥ is the structural diversity of its ligands, which encompass endogenous metabolites, dietary compounds and synthetic drugs. The high and increasing incidence of inflammatory and allergic disease, coupled with encouraging results from recent clinical trials, suggest that natural PPAR␥ agonists found in foods may be beneficial to human health by acting as anti-inflammatory molecules. PPAR␥ is therefore not only a target of the pharmaceutical industry, but also of great potential interest to the food industry, since it is activated by several natural dietary constituents. The prospects for dietary intervention in inflammatory disease have improved somewhat over the last few years, and are reviewed here. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction—PPAR␥ and its role in inflammation Inflammatory disease is a broad term encompassing a wide range of pathological conditions affecting many organs and tissues. Inflammatory diseases include inflammatory bowel disease, atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma and psoriasis. The incidence of atopic illness including asthma has increased considerably over recent decades [1]. Ulcerative Colitis and the less prevalent, but more severe, Crohn’s disease, were both considered to be the diseases of Western societies but the incidence DOI of original article:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.06.009. Abbreviations: 15d-PGJ2 , 15-deoxy-12,14 prostaglandin J2; 5-ASA, 5aminosalicylic acid; c9, t11, cis-9 trans-11; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IL, interleukin; PPAR␥, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; t10, c12, trans-10, cis-12; TNF-␣, tumour necrosis factor alpha. 夽 An error resulted in this article appearing in a previous volume of this journal. The article is reprinted here for the reader’s convenience and for the continuity of this special issue. The details of the original publication are as follows [Martin, 2009. Role of PPAR-gamma in inflammation. Prospects for therapeutic intervention by food components. Mutation Research 669, 1–7. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.06.009]. ∗ Tel.: +64 6 953 7747; fax: +64 6 953 7701. E-mail address: [email protected]. 0027-5107/$ – see front matter © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.09.009 and prevalence of these illnesses in Asia are increasing [2–4]. The risk of developing colorectal carcinoma is increased for individuals with inflammatory bowel disease [5]. In geographical regions where diets are high in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) cancer incidence is low [6]. It has been suggested that some of the protective effect of dietary n-3 PUFAs may be due to their antiinflammatory, PPAR␥ activating properties [7]. The peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are a subset of the nuclear receptor superfamily. Unlike the classical hormone-activated receptors such as the estrogen receptor, which is located in the cytoplasm and translocates to the nucleus after binding of the activating ligand, the PPAR receptors reside in the nucleus bound to DNA response elements [8]. The nuclear location of the PPAR receptor is typical of metabolite-activated nuclear receptors. There are three forms of PPAR receptor: alpha, beta/delta and gamma [9], all of which form obligate heterodimers with the retinoid-X-receptor (RXR-receptor). PPAR␣ is the target for hypolipidaemic drugs known as fibrates. PPAR/␦ is now emerging as an important regulator of bowel cell proliferation/differentiation. The tissue expression of the three PPAR forms is different but overlapping. The functions of PPAR␥ and PPAR␣ also overlap somewhat. PPAR␥ is expressed in a range of tissues including adipocytes, skeletal muscle cells, osteoclasts, osteoblasts and several immune-type cells. Unsurprisingly, germ-line knockout of 58 H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 PPAR␥ is lethal. Four transcripts of the PPAR␥ gene are found in human tissue as a result of tissue specific variations in promoters and splicing [10–12]. However in normal cells only two proteins, PPARG-1 and PPARG-2 are expressed. PPARG-1 protein can be produced from transcripts PPARG-1, PPARG-3 and PPARG-4. PPARG-1 protein is widely expressed whereas PPARG-2 is mainly restricted to adipocytes [13]. PPAR␥ is activated, not only by ligand (agonist) binding, but also by phosphorylation, which increases the ligand-independent transcriptional activity [14]. Apart from its role as a transcription factor, PPAR␥ also acts as a trans-repressor of macrophage inflammatory genes [15]. In this mechanism the ligand-dependent sumoylation of PPAR␥ represses inflammatory gene expression. Binding of sumoylated PPAR␥ to a DNA-bound repressor complex blocks the expression of inflammatory gene products by preventing the 19S proteasome-mediated degradation of the repressor complex. Ligand-independent activation of PPAR/␦ can suppress bowel disease by down regulation of inflammatory signalling [16]. Evidence of the role of PPAR␥ in inflammatory disease is apparent from genetic screening of patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Various genetic linkages to immune genes have been recognized for MS, notably the receptors for interleukin (IL) 2 and IL7. Very recently a PPAR␥ polymorphism has been added to the list of MS-linked genes. In a study of 116 patients and 211 healthy age-matched controls, the Ala/Ala genotype of the PPAR␥ Pro12Ala polymorphism was associated with a 10-year, statistically significantly delayed onset of disease in patients with MS [17]. The anti-inflammatory effects of the Pro12Ala polymorphism are corroborated by a recent study of atherosclerosis, a chronic, macrophage-mediated, inflammatory disease of the arterial blood vessels. This 10-year follow-up study of men with coronary artery disease showed that carriers of the Pro12Ala allele of PPAR␥ have less widespread atherosclerosis and are considerably protected against 10-year vascular morbidity and mortality [18]. The use of PPAR␥ knockout mice has provided strong evidence for the role of natural PPAR␥ ligands in controlling inflammation. In a seminal study, colitis was induced in mice deficient in colonic PPAR␥ by two unrelated mechanisms, either by treatment with oral dextran sodium sulfate or by transfer of CD4+ CD45RBhi T-cells. In the former approach colitis is induced by chemical irritation of the mucosa and is dependent on macrophage activation and epithelial cell apoptosis whereas in the latter method, colitis is mediated by antigen driven TH1-cell activation. In both of these models, wild type mice responded to dietary conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) by clinical amelioration of colitis while the colonic PPAR␥ knockout mice were unresponsive [19]. The anti-inflammatory effects of PPAR␥ are closely linked with its anti-diabetic effects. Mice with a macrophage-specific deletion of PPAR␥ were tested for their ability to resist a challenge with Leishmania major, a parasitic infection which requires an M1 (cell-mediated) type response from the host for immunity to occur. Mice lacking macrophage PPAR␥ were not only less susceptible to Leishmania spp. infection, as expected, but the same animals were also prone to diabetic illness [20]. Selective knockout of macrophage PPAR␥ resulted in a reduced capacity for skeletal muscle to metabolise fatty acids and sugars. The expression of transcription factors and co-activator proteins necessary for mitochondrial biogenesis were also greatly reduced. Thus macrophage PPAR␥ activation not only induces differentiation of macrophages into the non-inflammatory, M2 type but also has profound effects on the metabolic status of the whole mouse. A similar demonstration of the profound physiological effect of selective knockout (KO) of the PPAR␥ gene, this time selectively removing the gene from endothelial cells, resulted in the wholetrunk hair loss in the offspring of the KO mice. The mechanism underlying these bizarre symptoms was traced to the default synthesis of toxic, highly inflammatory oxidised lipids in the milk of mice lacking the endothelial PPAR␥ gene. These oxidised lipids were generated due to a huge excess of lipoxygenase activity, normally repressed by the endothelial PPAR␥ gene. Accumulation of the inflammatory lipid mediators in the skin of the suckling mice caused inflammation and subsequent alopecia. Skin inflammation was confirmed as the cause of alopecia when topical aspirin cured the inflammation and prevented the hair loss [21]. These examples suggest that systemic inflammation is the default physiological condition, held in check by PPAR␥ under normal circumstances. Animal studies and human trials of PPAR␥ activating drugs, normally used to treat diabetes, have shown these compounds to have great potential as anti-inflammatory drugs. In a mouse model of asthma, pioglitazone, a PPAR␥ activator, was found to be as effective as dexamethasone, a corticosteroid commonly used in asthma treatment [22]. In a rat model of rheumatoid arthritis known as adjuvant induced arthritis, the PPAR␥ activating drugs pioglitazone and rosiglitazone, were found to reduce bone erosion and inflammatory bone loss [23]. Using Type II diabetic rats as a model of inflammatory renal disease, pioglitazone reduced nephropathy by an anti-inflammatory mechanism [24]. The successes of PPAR␥ activators in animal models of the autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis (MS) have given strong support to the use of PPAR␥ agonists in human trials [25]. The use of rosiglitazone in human inflammatory bowel disease gave beneficial results in an Ulcerative Colitis clinical trial [26]. The US National Institutes of Health are currently recruiting participants for a trial of pioglitazone in the inflammatory diseases rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis (clinical trial identifier NCT00554853). A trial of pioglitazone in asthma (clinical trial identifier NCT00787644) is currently in the planning phase. PPAR␥ is of particular interest to the food industry because PPAR␥ activators and their precursors e.g. linolenic and linoleic acid are abundant in several foods. In addition, certain isoforms of linoleic acid, notably the trans-10, cis-12 isoform are normally rare in the diet but present in higher concentration in certain synthetic food supplements used for weight loss [27]. The t10, c12 isoform of CLA is effective at inducing weight loss in mice, but it does this by antagonising PPAR␥ and inducing the stress response in adipocytes [28,29]. On the other hand, the cis-9, trans-11 isoform of linoleic acid, which is commonly found in natural food products, inhibits allergic airway sensitization and inflammation in mice [30] via a PPAR␥ dependent mechanism. The mechanisms by which dietary PPAR␥ activators may ameliorate inflammatory disease are discussed. 2. Anti-inflammatory effects of PPAR␥ ligands—synthetic and natural PPAR␥ ligands can be divided into various categories: natural/synthetic, endogenous/exogenous or covalent/reversible. To demonstrate the variety of PPAR␥ ligands, the structures of the ligands discussed in this article are shown in Fig. 1. PPAR␥ agonists known as thiazolidinediones are commonly prescribed for the treatment of diabetes but have been investigated for their anti-inflammatory effects. PPAR␥ protein was identified in the antigen presenting cells, monocytes and macrophages and synthetic PPAR␥ agonists including pioglitazone, troglitazone and rosiglitazone were shown to suppress production of inflammatory cytokines by these cells [31,32]. Subsequently, PPAR␥ was identified in dendritic cells which are potent and highly differentiated, professional antigen presenting cells. The same thiazolidinedione compounds were demonstrated to decrease dendritic cell secretion of IL12, a potent TH1-type inflammatory cytokine [33,34]. H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 59 Fig. 1. The diversity of PPAR␥ ligands. In addition, the synthesis of TH1-cell but not TH2-cell recruiting chemokines was also suppressed by thiazolidinediones [33]. An mRNA profiling study using mouse macrophages demonstrated that rosiglitazone acted via PPAR␥ as a general repressor of a broad range of lipopolysaccharide and interferon-␥ target genes. Taken together, these studies provide strong evidence of the antiinflammatory function of PPAR␥ through its ability to suppress TH1-type cytokine production in macrophages and dendritic cells [35]. Beneficial effects of the PPAR␥ activator, rosiglitazone, were reported in two recent clinical trials for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis [36,37]. Animal models of inflammation are now being used to explore the utility of PPAR␥ agonists in other inflammatory diseases. In a mouse model of systemic lupus erthythematosus, rosiglitazone reduced autoantibody production, renal disease, and atherosclerosis [38]. The PPAR␥ agonist troglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, reduced renal scarring and inflammation in a mouse model of renal fibrosis [39]. In a rat model of post-operative brain inflammation, rosiglitazone attenuated myeloperoxidase activity and qualitatively decreased expression of the cytokine markers of inflammation, IL1 and tumour necrosis factor ␣ (TNF-␣) [40]. The beneficial effects of rosiglitazone in brain inflammation are tempered by the fact that it has poor penetrance through the blood–brain barrier. Conceivably its effects are mediated outside the brain, perhaps in the brain vasculature. In a mouse model of gastro-intestinal candidiasis, rosiglitazone prevented gut colonization by activation of PPAR␥ [41]. This effect was mediated by increased expression of the mannose-receptor on mucosal macrophages. Using a rat model of pancreatitis, it was shown that the PPAR␥ agonists 15-deoxy12,14 prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2 ) and troglitazone both suppress pancreatic inflammation which was measured by reduced pancreatic weight and lowered levels of the inflammatory cytokines IL6 and Transforming-Growth-Factor-1 [42]. 60 H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The anti-inflammatory mechanism of 5-ASA has been shown to be dependent on PPAR␥ activation in a PPAR␥ +/− mouse model of colitis [43]. These data were also confirmed by culture of human colonic biopsies. These human clinical trials and animal studies show that PPAR␥ agonists can have systemic anti-inflammatory effects. Similar studies using natural dietary PPAR␥ ligands corroborate the drug-based evidence. The dietary PUFAs and PPAR␥ ligands, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and ␥-linolenic acid were used to treat the human enterocyte cell line, Caco-2 and human dendritic cells, during exposure of the cells to IL1 and lipopolysaccharide. Not only was secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL6 and IL8, reduced by these PUFAs, but the expression of PPAR␥ was itself enhanced [44]. The central role of PPAR␥ in these cellular responses to PUFAs was confirmed by the use of GW 9662, a synthetic PPAR␥ antagonist, which blocked the anti-inflammatory actions of the PUFAs. In a recent animal feeding trial in pigs, linseed oil significantly reduced the expression of TNF-␣, a proinflammatory cytokine and marker of inflammation, and increased muscle mass [45]. Linseed oil’s main components are the PPAR␥ agonists linoleic and linolenic acid. In this study, PPAR␥ concentration in the spleen and muscle negatively correlated with TNF-␣ in the serum. X-ray crystallographic studies of PPAR␥ with bound ligands has provided great insight into the mechanism of PPAR␥ activation. The crystal structures showed that the ligand binding pocket can accommodate two fatty acids simultaneously. More remarkable was the finding that oxo-fatty acid metabolites [46] and the antiinflammatory 15-deoxy-12,14 prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2 ) [47] bind covalently to the sulfhydryl group of at Cys285 in the ligand binding domain by a Michael addition mechanism. The covalently bound ligands were shown to be particularly effective PPAR␥ activators. The variety and apparent lack of selectivity of the PPAR␥ ligand binding pocket has led to concern about which ligands should be considered physiologically relevant. The discovery of the covalentbinding nature of certain ligands strongly supports the credibility of these ligands as being physiologically important since reversibly binding ligands are much more dependant on concentration for activity than covalent binders. This is because a reversible ligand relies on a having either a high affinity or a high concentration to achieve appreciable binding to its receptor i.e. to establish a dynamic equilibrium in which the receptor function is affected. By contrast, a covalent binder with only moderate affinity is more able to influence receptor function since, once covalently bound, it does not dissociate from the receptor. Penicillin and aspirin, are classic examples of covalently binding drugs. 3. Dietary PPAR␥ activators, their sources and bioavailability Linoleic acid is a well known component of many foods and is present in vegetables, fruits, nuts, grains and seeds among other dietary sources. Linoleic and linolenic acids are highly orally bioavailable to the plasma and the brain. Indeed the exceptional bioavailability characteristics of these fatty acids have lead to their design as drug-delivery vehicles in emulsions with anti-HIV protease treatments to enhance drug delivery to plasma and brain [48], demonstrated using a mouse model. The conjugated form of linoleic acid cis-9, trans-11, a well researched PPAR␥ ligand, was shown to be produced naturally from linoleic acid by the action of gut flora, especially probiotic bacteria [49]. In the same study using human HT-29 colonic carcinoma cells, CLA was also shown to enhance expression of PPAR␥. CLA is sold as a dietary supplement to induce weight loss. The safety of this treatment is controversial due to the high-content of t10, c12 linoleic acid in some synthetic preparations. Recently, the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus crispatus M247, was shown to induce increased PPAR␥ expression and activity in the intestinal epithelial cells of mice [50]. The mediator of the PPAR␥ inducing activity was identified as bacterially derived hydrogen peroxide. Bacterial strains unable to produce H2 O2 were also unable to induce PPAR␥ expression while antioxidants and H2 O2 scavengers blocked the effect. These data illustrate the important point that probiotic bacteria can increase PPAR␥ activity either by the metabolism of precursors into PPAR␥ agonists or by the synthesis of compounds which enhance PPAR␥ gene expression. The dependence of PPAR␥ function on the colonizing microbiota of the gut was demonstrated when Enterococcus faecalis isolated from newborn babies was shown to induce phosphorylation of PPAR␥ in primary colonic cells and colonic cell lines. Phosphorylation of PPAR␥ activated transcription of anti-inflammatory target genes, notably including the anti-inflammatory IL10 [51]. The PPAR␥ antagonist GW9662 specifically blocked these effects. The authors did not identify which product of Enterococcus faecalis was responsible for the PPAR␥ phosphorylation but suggested CLA as a likely mediator. A meta-analysis of several studies concluded that CLA is moderately beneficial for human health [52]. As discussed earlier, macrophage PPAR␥ has both anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic actions. It is therefore feasible that the dietary benefits of CLA, seen in the meta-analysis, derive from the transformation of unconjugated linoleic acid to CLA by gut bacteria. In an in vitro study of 30 strains of gram-positive intestinal bacteria, certain species, notably Roseburia, were capable of converting the unconjugated form of linoleic acid (cis-9, cis-12, 18:2) to the immediate precursors of the health promoting cis-9, trans-11 form. An in vitro, biochemical study showed that the variability among bacterial strains was substantial, some strains having almost none of the required linoleate isomerase activity necessary to perform this metabolic step [53]. The implications from this work are that variations in the gut flora among individuals may well influence their inflammatory and diabetic status. CLA isoforms differ in terms of health benefit and PPAR␥ activation. In primary cultures of human adipocytes the t10–c12 isoform caused adipocyte delipidation, insulin resistance and inflammation by acting as a PPAR␥ antagonist. These activities were not associated with the more common and natural cis-9, trans-11 (c9, t11) isoform of CLA [54]. The pro-inflammatory effects of the trans-10, cis-12 (t10, c12) CLA isoform in human adipocytes were subsequently shown to be reversible by resveratrol [55] in an in vitro, cell-based study. A 16-week dietary trial comparing c9, t11 CLA with the synthetic form t10, c12 CLA in a group of 75 healthy postmenopausal women, found that the t10, c12 isoform increased levels of inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein and fibrinogen [56]. A study of the effects of long term feeding of c9, t11 CLA to rats gave two compelling examples of beneficial immune modulation from an analysis of their immune response to ovalbumin [57]. Firstly, the ovalbumin-specific response of the splenocytes was enhanced 50%, while at the same time, the polyclonal splenocyte response to mitogen stimulation was reduced by up to 20%. Secondly, the intestinal anti-ovalbumin immunoglobulin A (IgA) response was increased by 75%. Although these effects may be mediated, in part, by PPAR␥, no evidence was presented in this particular study to test PPAR␥ involvement in the immunologically beneficial effects of dietary c9, t11 CLA. However the anti-lymphoproliferative effects of the dietary PUFAs and PPAR␥ ligands, linoleic acid and DHA have been demonstrated on human dendritic cells [58]. In this cell-based, in vitro study, specific block- H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 ing of PPAR␥ activity with the antagonist GW9662, also blocked the anti-inflammatory effects of the PUFAs. Although the evidence for PPAR␥ mediated anti-inflammatory effects is convincing, interpretation of the data from CLA feeding trial is complicated by the fact that CLA is also an activator of PPAR␣ and PPAR/␦ [59,60]. Likewise, in the mRNA profiling study using rosiglitazone to stimulate PPAR␥ receptors in mouse macrophages, it was apparent, using PPAR␥ deficient macrophages, that PPAR␦ was activated at higher concentrations of rosiglitazone [35]. Similarly, in a study using normal and PPAR␣ deficient mice, the PPAR␥ ligand, pioglitazone was shown to suppress inflammation through a PPAR␣ dependent mechanism [61]. Thus the human health benefits of PPAR␥ agonists, in the diet and from pharmaceutical sources, are probably not restricted to their PPAR␥ activating properties. Furthermore the metabolic fate of CLA in humans is not fully understood but it is apparent that the conversion of CLA to conjugated arachidonic acid is substantially more efficient in rats than in humans [62]. Differences in CLA metabolism may therefore explain the apparent disagreement between animal trials which suggest CLA induces weight loss and human trials which are equivocal on this issue [62]. Dietary phytochemicals with quite different structures and properties from the unsaturated fatty acids discussed so far, have been characterised from oregano by activity-based fractionation. Various flavonoids and other phytochemicals from oregano were characterised for their agonist and antagonist PPAR␥ activities. Compounds were first identified as ligands using a PPAR␥ fluorescence-polarization assay and subsequently classified as agonist or antagonist, based on their ability to inhibit rosiglitazone-induced cellular responses. The dietary flavonoids quercetin, luteolin, rosmarinic acid and diosmetin were found to be PPAR␥ antagonists, naringenin and apigenin were modulators and biochanin A was found to be a PPAR␥ agonist [63]. Although the bioavailability of these phytochemicals needs to be addressed, the approach demonstrates that many common phytochemicals have the potential to influence PPAR␥ activity, due to the promiscuous nature of the binding site. The notion of potentially harmful over-activation of PPAR␥ by dietary constituents was raised by Adapala, who suggested that prolonged consumption of curcumin, a polyphenol and principal component of the spice turmeric, suppressed the immune response and exacerbated Leishmania donovani infection in mice [64]. However, curcumin is not itself a PPAR␥ ligand and probably exerts its anti-inflammatory effects by other mechanisms such as upregulated expression of PPAR␥ [65,66]. Zingerone, the active ingredient in ginger, which is structurally similar to curcumin, is also antiinflammatory through its ability to increase PPAR␥ expression [67]. Apoptosis delivers anti-inflammatory signals to macrophages while necrosis is pro-inflammatory [68]. The sumoylation of PPAR␥ in mouse macrophages exposed, in vitro, to apoptotic cells results in a phenotype shift in the macrophages from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory [69]. Diets which contain pro-apoptotic compounds may not only protect against cancer, but also reduce inflammation [70–72]. The dietary PUFA and PPAR␥ ligand EPA has a PPAR␥ mediated apoptotic effect in HT-29 colon cancer cells [7] in vitro and CLA has been reported to induce apoptosis in the human breast cancer cell line SKBr3 [73]. A synergistic effect may therefore occur when cells are exposed to compounds such as these, which are both pro-apoptotic and also anti-inflammatory. 4. Conclusion The tissue-specific knockout of the PPAR␥ gene has revealed the pivotal role of PPAR␥ in regulating inflammation and metabolism 61 in mice. The importance of PPAR␥ in inflammatory disease is evident from the success of PPAR␥ activating drugs in animal disease models and human Ulcerative Colitis trials. Furthermore, the genetic association between PPAR␥ polymorphisms and diseases such as multiple sclerosis and atherosclerosis confirms the role of PPAR␥ in human inflammatory disease. These data support the hypothesis that PPAR␥ activation in healthy individuals suppresses systemic inflammation. The prospects that dietary factors may have beneficial effects in inflammatory disease are good, since various dietary ligands such as conjugated (c9, t11) linoleic acid or DHA, are present in certain foods. Pre-biotic foods and probiotic bacteria play an important role in influencing the immune phenotype through their ability to convert food components into PPAR␥ agonists and to synthesise compounds de novo which stimulate PPAR␥ gene expression. The discovery of new dietary PPAR␥ activators coupled with understanding of the subtle mechanisms by which these compounds influence PPAR␥ activity promises to be an exciting field in the immediate future—with enormous implications for human health. Role of funding source Internal funding from Plant and Food Research. Conflict of interest None. References [1] S.F. Bloomfield, R. Stanwell-Smith, R.W.R. Crevel, J. Pickup, Too clean, or not too clean: the hygiene hypothesis and home hygiene, Clinical and Experimental Allergy 36 (2006) 402–425. [2] K.L. Goh, S.D. Xiao, Inflammatory bowel disease: a survey of the epidemiology in Asia, Journal of Digestive Diseases 10 (2009) 1–6. [3] E.V. Loftus, Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences, Gastroenterology 126 (2004) 1504–1517. [4] B.A. Jacobsen, J. Fallingborg, H.H. Rasmussen, K.R. Nielsen, A.M. Drewes, E. Puho, G.L. Nielsen, H.T. Sorensen, Increase in incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in northern Denmark: a population-based study, 1978–2002, European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 18 (2006) 601–606. [5] A.B. Carter, S.A. Misyak, R. Hontecillas, J. Bassaganya-Riera, Dietary modulation of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer through PPAR␥, PPAR Research 2009 (2009), Article ID 498352. [6] C.P.J. Caygill, M.J. Hill, Fish, N-3 fatty-acids and human colorectal and breastcancer mortality, European Journal of Cancer Prevention 4 (1995) 329–332. [7] C.D. Allred, D.R. Talbert, R.C. Southard, X. Wang, M.W. Kilgore, PPAR gamma 1 as a molecular target of eicosapentaenoic acid in human colon cancer (HT-29) cells, Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008) 250–256. [8] C.K. Glass, M.G. Rosenfeld, The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors, Genes & Development 14 (2000) 121–141. [9] C.K. Glass, S. Ogawa, Combinatorial roles of nuclear receptors in inflammation and immunity, Nature Reviews Immunology 6 (2006) 44–55. [10] T.T. Wang, J. Xu, X.F. Yu, R.C. Yang, Z.C. Han, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in malignant diseases, Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology 58 (2006) 1–14. [11] L. Michalik, J. Auwerx, J.P. Berger, V.K. Chatterjee, C.K. Glass, F.J. Gonzalez, P.A. Grimaldi, T. Kadowaki, M.A. Lazar, S. O’Rahilly, C.N.A. Palmer, J. Plutzky, J.K. Reddy, B.M. Spiegelman, B. Staels, W. Wahli, International Union of Pharmacology. LXI. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, Pharmacological Reviews 58 (2006) 726–741. [12] C. Bruedigam, M. Koedam, H. Chiba, M. Eijken, J. van Leeuwen, Evidence for multiple peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcripts in bone: fine-tuning by hormonal regulation and mRNA stability, FEBS Letters 582 (2008) 1618–1624. [13] P. Escher, O. Braissant, S. Basu-Modak, L. Michalik, W. Wahli, B. Desvergne, Rat PPARs: quantitative analysis in adult rat tissues and regulation in fasting and refeeding, Endocrinology 142 (2001) 4195–4202. [14] C. Diradourian, J. Girard, J.P. Pegorier, Phosphorylation of PPARs: from molecular characterization to physiological relevance, Biochimie 87 (2005) 33–38. [15] G. Pascual, A.L. Fong, S. Ogawa, A. Gamliel, A.C. Li, V. Perissi, D.W. Rose, T.M. Willson, M.G. Rosenfeld, C.K. Glass, A SUMOylation-dependent pathway mediates transrepression of inflammatory response genes by PPAR-gamma, Nature 437 (2005) 759–763. 62 H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 [16] J.M. Peters, H.E. Hollingshead, F.J. Gonzalez, Role of peroxisome-proliferatoractivated receptor beta/delta (PPAR beta/delta) in gastrointestinal tract function and disease, Clinical Science 115 (2008) 107–127. [17] L. Klotz, S. Schmidt, R. Heun, T. Klockgether, H. Kolsch, Association of the PPAR gamma gene polymorphism Pro12Ala with delayed onset of multiple sclerosis, Neuroscience Letters 449 (2009) 81–83. [18] J.J. Regieli, J.W. Jukema, P.A. Doevendans, A.H. Zwinderman, Y. van der Graaf, J.J. Kastelein, D.E. Grobbee, PPAR gamma variant influences angiographic outcome and 10-year cardiovascular risk in male symptomatic coronary artery disease patients, Diabetes Care 32 (2009) 839–844. [19] J. Bassaganya-Riera, K. Reynolds, S. Martino-Catt, Y.Z. Cui, L. Hennighausen, F. Gonzalez, J. Rohrer, A.U. Benninghoff, R. Hontecillas, Activation of PPAR gamma and delta by conjugated linoleic acid mediates protection from experimental inflammatory bowel disease, Gastroenterology 127 (2004) 777–791. [20] J.I. Odegaard, R.R. Ricardo-Gonzalez, M.H. Goforth, C.R. Morel, V. Subramanian, L. Mukundan, A.R. Eagle, D. Vats, F. Brombacher, A.W. Ferrante, A. Chawla, Macrophage-specific PPAR gamma controls alternative activation and improves insulin resistance, Nature 447 (2007), pp. 1116-U1112. [21] Y.H. Wan, A. Saghatelian, L.W. Chong, C.L. Zhang, B.F. Cravatt, R.M. Evans, Maternal PPAR gamma protects nursing neonates by suppressing the production of inflammatory milk, Genes & Development 21 (2007) 1895–1908. [22] V.R. Narala, R. Ranga, M.R. Smith, A.A. Berlin, T.J. Standiford, N.W. Lukacs, R.C. Reddy, Pioglitazone is as effective as dexamethasone in a cockroach allergeninduced murine model of asthma, Respiratory Research 8 (2007). [23] M. Koufany, D. Moulin, A. Bianchi, M. Muresan, S. Sebillaud, P. Netter, G. Weryha, J.Y. Jouzeau, Anti-inflammatory effect of antidiabetic thiazolidinediones prevents bone resorption rather than cartilage changes in experimental polyarthritis, Arthritis Research & Therapy 10 (2008). [24] G.J. Ko, Y.S. Kang, S.Y. Han, M.H. Lee, H.K. Song, K.H. Han, H.K. Kim, J.Y. Han, D.R. Cha, Pioglitazone attenuates diabetic nephropathy through an anti-inflammatory mechanism in type 2 diabetic rats, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 23 (2008) 2750–2760. [25] J.J. Brightt, C.C. Walline, S. Kanakasabai, S. Chakraborty, Targeting PPAR as a therapy to treat multiple sclerosis, Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 12 (2008) 1565–1575. [26] J.D. Lewis, G.R. Lichtenstein, J.J. Deren, B.E. Sands, S.B. Hanauer, J.A. Katz, B. Lashner, D.H. Present, S. Chuai, J.H. Ellenberg, L. Nessel, G.D. Wu, Rosiglitazone for active ulcerative colitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial, Gastroenterology 134 (2008) 688–695. [27] X.R. Zhou, C.H. Sun, J.R. Liu, D. Zhao, Dietary conjugated linoleic acid increases PPAR gamma gene expression in adipose tissue of obese rat, and improves insulin resistance, Growth Hormone & Igf Research 18 (2008) 361–368. [28] P.C. LaRosa, J.J.M. Riethoven, H. Chen, Y. Xia, Y. Zhou, M. Chen, J. Miner, M.E. Fromm, Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid activates the integrated stress response pathway in adipocytes, Physiological Genomics 31 (2007) 544–553. [29] H. Poirier, J.S. Shapiro, R.J. Kim, M.A. Lazar, Nutiritional supplementation with trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid induces inflammation of white adipose tissue, Diabetes 55 (2006) 1634–1641. [30] A. Jaudszus, M. Krokowski, P. Mockel, Y. Darcan, A. Avagyan, P. Matricardi, G. Jahreis, E. Hamelmann, Cis-9, trans-11-conjugated linoleic acid inhibits allergic sensitization and airway inflammation via a PPAR gamma-related mechanism in mice, Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008) 1336–1342. [31] M. Ricote, A.C. Li, T.M. Willson, C.J. Kelly, C.K. Glass, The peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation, Nature 391 (1998) 79–82. [32] C.Y. Jiang, A.T. Ting, B. Seed, PPAR-gamma agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines, Nature 391 (1998) 82–86. [33] P. Gosset, A.S. Charbonnier, P. Delerive, J. Fontaine, B. Staels, J. Pestel, A.B. Tonnel, F. Trottein, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators affect the maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells, European Journal of Immunology 31 (2001) 2857–2865. [34] C. Faveeuw, S. Fougeray, V. Angeli, J. Fontaine, G. Chinetti, P. Gosset, P. Delerive, C. Maliszewski, M. Capron, B. Staels, M. Moser, F. Trottein, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activators inhibit interleukin-12 production in murine dendritic cells, FEBS Letters 486 (2000) 261–266. [35] J.S. Welch, M. Ricote, T.E. Akiyama, F.J. Gonzalez, C.K. Glass, PPAR gamma and PPAR delta negatively regulate specific subsets of lipopolysaccharide and IFNgamma target genes in macrophages, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 2003, pp. 6712–6717. [36] J.D. Lewis, G.R. Lichtenstein, J.J. Deren, B.E. Sands, S.B. Hanauer, J.A. Katz, B. Lashner, D.H. Present, S. Chuai, J.H. Ellenbergr, L. Nessel, G.D. Wu, Rosiglitazone for active ulcerative colitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial, Gastroenterology 134 (2008) 688–695. [37] H.L. Liang, Q. Ouyang, A clinical trial of combined use of rosiglitazone and 5aminosalicylate for ulcerative colitis, World Journal of Gastroenterology 14 (2008) 114–119. [38] T. Aprahamian, R.G. Bonegio, C. Richez, K. Yasuda, L.K. Chiang, K. Sato, K. Walsh, I.R. Rifkin, The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist rosiglitazone ameliorates murine lupus by induction of adiponectin, Journal of Immunology 182 (2009) 340–346. [39] T. Kawai, T. Masaki, S. Doi, T. Arakawa, Y. Yokoyama, T. Doi, N. Kohno, N. Yorioka, PPAR-gamma agonist attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis and inflammation through reduction of TGF-beta, Laboratory Investigation 89 (2009) 47–58. [40] A. Hyong, V. Jadhav, S. Lee, W. Tong, J. Rowe, J.H. Zhang, J.P. Tang, Rosiglitazone, a PPAR gamma agonist, attenuates inflammation after surgical brain injury in rodents, Brain Research 1215 (2008) 218–224. [41] A. Coste, C. Lagane, C. Filipe, H. Authier, A. Gales, J. Bernad, V. Douin-Echinard, J.C. Lepert, P. Balard, M.D. Linas, J.F. Arnal, J. Auwerx, B. Pipy, IL-13 attenuates gastrointestinal candidiasis in normal and immunodeficient RAG-2(−/−) mice via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation, Journal of Immunology 180 (2008) 4939–4947. [42] J.H. Yu, K.H. Kim, H. Kim, SOCS 3 and PPAR-gamma ligands inhibit the expression of IL-6 and TGF-beta 1 by regulating JAK2/STAT3 signaling in pancreas, International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 40 (2008) 677–688. [43] C. Rousseaux, B. Lefebvre, L. Dubuquoy, P. Lefebvre, O. Romano, J. Auwerx, D. Metzger, W. Wahli, B. Desvergne, G.C. Naccari, P. Chavatte, A. Farce, P. Bulois, A. Cortot, J.F. Colombel, P. Desreumaux, Intestinal antiinflammatory effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid is dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, Journal of Experimental Medicine 201 (2005) 1205– 1215. [44] R. Marion-Letellier, M. Butler, P. Dechelotte, R.J. Playford, S. Ghosh, Comparison of cytokine modulation by natural peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands with synthetic ligands in intestinal-like Caco-2 cells and human dendritic cells-potential for dietary modulation of peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor gamma in intestinal inflammation, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 87 (2008) 939–948. [45] F.R. Huang, Z.P. Zhan, J. Luo, S.W. Jiang, J. Peng, Duration of feeding linseed diet influences peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and tumor necrosis factor gene expression, and muscle mass of growing-finishing barrows, Livestock Science 119 (2008) 194–201. [46] T. Itoh, L. Fairall, K. Amin, Y. Inaba, A. Szanto, B.L. Balint, L. Nagy, K. Yamamoto, J.W.R. Schwabe, Structural basis for the activation of PPAR gamma by oxidized fatty acids, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 15 (2008) 924–931. [47] T. Waku, T. Shiraki, T. Oyama, Y. Fujimoto, K. Maebara, N. Kamiya, H. Jingami, K. Morikawa, Structural insight into PPAR[gamma] activation through covalent modification with endogenous fatty acids, Journal of Molecular Biology 385 (2009) 188–199. [48] T.K. Vyas, A. Shahiwala, M.M. Amiji, Improved oral bioavailability and brain transport of Saquinavir upon administration in novel nanoemulsion formulations, International Journal of Pharmaceutics 347 (2008) 93–101. [49] J.B. Ewaschuk, J.W. Walker, H. Diaz, K.L. Madsen, Bioproduction of conjugated linoleic acid by probiotic bacteria occurs in vitro and in vivo in mice, Journal of Nutrition 136 (2006) 1483–1487. [50] S. Voltan, D. Martines, M. Elli, P. Brun, S. Longo, A. Porzionato, V. Macchi, R. D’Inca, M. Scarpa, G. Palu, G.C. Sturniolo, L. Morelli, I. Castagliuolo, Lactobacillus crispatus M247-derived H2 O2 acts as a signal transducing molecule activating peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma in the intestinal mucosa, Gastroenterology 135 (2008) 1216–1227. [51] A. Are, L. Aronsson, S.G. Wang, G. Greicius, Y.K. Lee, J.A. Gustafsson, S. Pettersson, V. Arulampalam, Enterococcus faecalis from newborn babies regulate endogenous PPAR gamma activity and IL-10 levels in colonic epithelial cells, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 2008, pp. 1943–1948. [52] L.D. Whigham, A.C. Watras, D.A. Schoeller, Efficacy of conjugated linoleic acid for reducing fat mass: a meta-analysis in humans, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 85 (2007) 1203–1211. [53] E. Devillard, F.M. McIntosh, S.H. Duncan, R.J. Wallace, Metabolism of linoleic acid by human gut bacteria: different routes for biosynthesis of conjugated linoleic acid, Journal of Bacteriology 189 (2007) 2566–2570. [54] A. Kennedy, S. Chung, K. LaPoint, O. Fabiyi, M.K. McIntosh, Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid antagonizes ligand-dependent PPAR gamma activity in primary cultures of human adipocytes, Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008) 455–461. [55] A. Kennedy, A. Overman, K. LaPoint, R. Hopkins, T. West, C.C. Chuang, K. Martinez, D. Bell, M. McIntosh, Conjugated linoleic acid-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in human adipocytes are attenuated by resveratrol, Journal of Lipid Research 50 (2009) 225–232. [56] T. Tholstrup, M. Raff, E.M. Straarup, P. Lund, S. Basu, J.M. Bruun, An oil mixture with trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid increases markers of inflammation and in vivo lipid peroxidation compared with cis-9, trans-11 conjugated linoleic acid in postmenopausal women, Journal of Nutrition 138 (2008) 1445–1451. [57] C. Ramirez-Santana, C. Castellote, M. Castell, M. Rivero, M. Rodriguez-Palmero, A. Franch, F.J. Perez-Cano, Long-term feeding of the cis-9,trans-11 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid reinforces the specific immune response in rats, Journal of Nutrition 139 (2009) 76–81. [58] F. Zapata-Gonzalez, F. Rueda, J. Petriz, P. Domingo, F. Villarroya, J. Diaz-Delfin, M.A. de Madariaga, J.C. Domingo, Human dendritic cell activities are modulated by the omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid, mainly through PPAR gamma: RXR heterodimers: comparison with other polyunsaturated fatty acids, Journal of Leukocyte Biology 84 (2008) 1172–1182. [59] S.Y. Moya-Camarena, J.P. Vanden Heuvel, S.G. Blanchard, L.A. Leesnitzer, M.A. Belury, Conjugated linoleic acid is a potent naturally occurring ligand and activator of PPAR alpha, Journal of Lipid Research 40 (1999) 1426–1433. [60] S.Y. Moya-Camarena, J.P. Vanden Heuvel, M.A. Belury, Conjugated linoleic acid activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor a and B subtypes but does not induce hepatic peroxisome proliferation in Sprague–Dawley rats, Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta: Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1436 (1999) 331–342. [61] G. Orasanu, O. Ziouzenkova, P.R. Devchand, V. Nehra, O. Hamdy, E.S. Horton, J. Plutzky, The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist pioglitazone represses inflammation in a peroxisome proliferator-activated H. Martin / Mutation Research 690 (2010) 57–63 [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] receptor-alpha-dependent manner in vitro and in vivo in mice, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 52 (2008) 869–881. M. Plourde, S. Jew, S.C. Cunnane, P.J.H. Jones, Conjugated linoleic acids: why the discrepancy between animal and human studies? Nutrition Reviews 66 (2008) 415–421. M. Mueller, B. Lukas, J. Novak, T. Simoncini, A.R. Genazzani, A. Jungbauert, Oregano: a source for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma antagonists, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56 (2008) 11621–11630. N. Adapala, M.M. Chan, Long-term use of an antiinflammatory, curcumin, suppressed type 1 immunity and exacerbated visceral leishmaniasis in a chronic experimental model, Laboratory Investigation 88 (2008) 1329–1339. A.M. Siddiqui, X.X. Cui, R.Q. Wu, W.F. Dong, M. Zhou, M.W. Hu, H.H. Simms, P. Wang, The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in an experimental model of sepsis is mediated by up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, Critical Care Medicine 34 (2006) 1874– 1882. V.R. Narala, M.R. Smith, R.K. Adapala, R. Ranga, K. Panati, B.B. Moore, T. Leff, V.D. Reddy, A.K. Kondapi, R.C. Reddy, Curcumin is not a ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-␥, Gene Therapy & Molecular Biology 13 (2009) 20–25. S.W. Chung, M.K. Kim, J.H. Chung, D.H. Kim, J.S. Choi, S. Anton, A.Y. Seo, K.Y. Park, T. Yokozawa, S.H. Rhee, B.P. Yu, H.Y. Chung, Peroxisome proliferator-activated [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] 63 receptor activation by a short-term feeding of zingerone in aged rats, Journal of Medicinal Food 12 (2009) 345–350. R.E. Cocco, D.S. Ucker, Distinct modes of macrophage recognition for apoptotic and necrotic cells are not specified exclusively by phosphatidylserine exposure, Molecular Biology of the Cell 12 (2001) 919–930. C. Jennewein, A.M. Kuhn, M.V. Schmidt, V. Meilladec-Jullig, A. von Knethen, F.J. Gonzalez, B. Brune, Sumoylation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma by apoptotic cells prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced NCoR removal from kappa B binding sites proinflammatory cytokines, Journal of Immunology 181 (2008) 5646–5652. J. Ju, X.P. Hao, M.J. Lee, J.D. Lambert, G. Lu, H. Xiao, H.L. Newmark, C.S. Yang, A gamma-tocopherol-rich mixture of tocopherols inhibits colon inflammation and carcinogenesis in azoxymethane and dextran sulfate sodium-treated mice, Cancer Prevention Research 2 (2009) 143–152. E.H. Jeffery, M. Araya, Physiological effects of broccoli consumption, Phytochemistry Reviews 8 (2009) 283–298. T. Tanaka, Y. Yasui, R. Ishigamori-Suzuki, T. Oyama, Citrus compounds inhibit inflammation- and obesity-related colon carcinogenesis in mice, Nutrition and Cancer: An International Journal 60 (2008) 70–80. X.L. Yuan, F. He, Q. Chen, X.L. Yang, D.P. Yang, D.M. Wang, L. Zhong, Studies on PPAR gamma signal pathway of conjugated linoleic acid isomers induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cell line SKBr3, Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics 36 (2009) 491–499.