Why We’re All Here: The effort to align water fund prioritization in Latin America Heather Tallis Latin American Water Funds Platform Xixaola, Panama FONAPA, Ecuador Water Fund Investment Prioritization Where should new funds be developed? Howshould shouldfund $10 M How be bespent? spent? What activities? Where? Idea, concepto Análisis de servicios ecosistémicos Definición de área de influencia del Fondo de Agua Análisis de actores involucrados en un Fondo de Agua Estudios de factibilidad Creación de un grupo de trabajo promotor Elaboración de estudios técnicos Análisis jurídico e institucional Resultados esperados Diseño del Fondo, negociación y constitución Diseño de Estructura del Fondo de Agua Negociación de contrato entre socios Elaboración de mecanismo de toma de decisiones Definición de comisiones de administración y remuneraciones Firma del contrato entre socios Conformación del equipo y elaboración del plan estratégico Nombramiento y celebración del primer Comité Directivo Nombramiento del Secretario Técnico Nombramiento del Comité Técnico Diseño del plan estratégico del Fondo Diseño de estrategia de levantamiento de fondos Inicio de actividades y operación del Fondo de Agua Ejecución de plan estratégico Implementación estrategia de levantamiento de recursos Difusión de resultados Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo adaptativo Diseño y ejecución de un plan de monitoreo Aligning Water Fund Investment Prioritization in Latin America Water Fund Technical Secretaries Government Agency Representatives NGO representatives Platform representatives Academics Objectives: Share experience from existing water funds Agree on key steps for water fund investment prioritization Core Components of Investment Prioritization Choose Objectives Diagnostic Screen Select Priority Areas Choose Activities Allocate Budget Estimate Returns Design Monitoring ROI Law Experience Literature Experimental Attribute Ranking Models Negotiate Experts Aligning Water Fund Investment Prioritization in Latin America Decision: Develop a tool and guidance that allows standardization AND flexibility for each step Water Fund Investment Prioritization Working Group Core Team Advisory Group Core Components of Investment Prioritization SMART objectives, quantitative, beneficiaryspecific Choose Objectives Diagnostic Screen Select Priority Areas Choose Activities Allocate Budget Estimate Returns Design Monitoring ROI Law Experience Literature Experimental Attribute Ranking Models Negotiate Experts The Birth of the WATER Tool 1 1 Investment Portfolio 2 Estimated Return on Investment 3 Estimated Value of Science (Objectives, Activities, Budget, Diagnostic Screen, Priority Areas) (Estimate Returns) (Business case for approach) 2 3 Core Team Advisory Group Timeline Review & Feedback Development WATER tool Feb Mar Feedback & Synthesis Apr Workshop 1: Investment Portfolios Development May Review & Feedback Specialized Engagement June Feedback & Synthesis July Workshop 2: More objectives, Estimates returns Aug Specialized Engagement Development Sept Feed & Synth Oct Workshop 3: Value of science The WATER Tool Today 1 1 Investment Portfolio 2 Estimated Return on Investment 3 Estimated Value of Science (Objectives, Activities, Budget, Diagnostic Screen, Priority Areas) (Estimate Returns) (Business case for approach) 2 3 Latin American Water Funds Platform & Beyond Xixaola, Panama FONAPA, Ecuador