transdiagnostic group cbt for anxiety disorder

Asociación Española
de Psicología Clínica
y Psicopatología
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica Vol. 17, N.º 3, pp. 205-217, 2012
Spanish Journal of Clinical Psychology, www.aepcp.net ISSN 1136-5420/12
TRANSDIAGNOSTIC GROUP CBT FOR ANXIETY DISORDER:
EFFICACY, ACCEPTABILITY, AND BEYOND
PETER J. NORTON
Anxiety Disorder Clinic, Department of Psychology, University of Houston, USA
Abstract: Interest in transdiagnostic approaches to the cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) of
emotional disorders has been increasing over the past decade. The purpose of this paper was to
review the rationale behind transdiagnostic treatment models, describe one such group-based treatment protocol in detail, and report on the building evidence base to date. The evidence suggests that
transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety is associated with symptom improvement, performs better than
waitlist controls, is associated with improvements in comorbid disorders, and performs equivalently to established diagnosis-specific treatments. Transdiagnostic protocols are also associated
with good client satisfaction, high levels of therapeutic alliance and group cohesion, and positive
treatment perceptions during and following treatment. Limitations and directions for future research
are discussed.
Keywords: Transdiagnostic; unified; group treatment; emotional disorders, cognitive behavior
therapy
TCC transdiagnóstica de grupo para los trastornos de ansiedad: Eficacia,
aceptabilidad y otros aspectos
Resumen: Durante la última década se ha venido incrementando el interés por los enfoques del
transdiagnóstico en el tratamiento cognitivo-conductual de los trastornos emocionales. El propósito del presente trabajo consiste en revisar los fundamentos que subyacen a los modelos de tratamiento transdiagnóstico, describir con detalle un protocolo de tratamiento transdiagnóstico de
grupo, y proporcionar la evidencia aportada hasta la fecha. La evidencia sugiere que la terapia
cognitivo-conductual (TCC) transdiagnóstica de la ansiedad se asocia a mejoría de los síntomas, es
superior al grupo de control de lista de espera, y es similar a los tratamientos diagnóstico-específicos ya establecidos. Los protocolos de transdiagnóstico también se han asociado a buena satisfacción
del cliente, niveles elevados de alianza terapéutica y cohesión grupal, y percepciones positivas del
tratamiento durante el seguimiento. Se discuten las limitaciones y las direcciones para la investigación futura.
Palabras clave: Transdiagnóstico; tratamiento unificado; tratamiento de grupo; trastornos emocionales; terapia cognitivo-conductual.
1
Interest
in transdiagnostic approaches to the
cognitive-behavioral treatment of emotional
disorders has been increasing over the past decade, with numerous empirical (e.g., Farchione
et al., 2012; Norton, 2012a) and theoretical
papers (e.g., Erickson, Janeck, & Tallman,
2009; Norton, 2006), specials issues (see Mansell, 2008; Taylor & Clark, 2009), book chapters
Correspondence: Peter J. Norton, Ph.D., Department of
Psychology, 126 Heyne Bldg., University of Houston,
Houston, TX, 77204-5022, USA, Phone: 713-743-8675,
Fax: 713-743-8633. E-mail: [email protected].
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 205
(e.g., Fairholme, Boisseau, Ellard, Ehrenreich,
& Barlow, 2010; Norton, 2009), and books
(e.g., Barlow, Farchione, et al., 2011; Norton,
2012b) being devoted to the topic. At their
heart, transdiagnostic approaches to CBT hold
that finer clinical distinctions among classes of
mental disorders, such as the diagnoses subsumed under the classification of Anxiety Disorders or the specific Eating Disorder diagnoses,
are of lesser clinical importance than the broader across-diagnosis (or transdiagnostic) factors inherent to all mental disorders within the
larger classification (Harvey, Watkins, Mansell,
10/12/12 09:07
206
Peter J. Norton
& Shafran, 2004; Norton, 2006). Indeed, as has
been argued elsewhere (Norton, 2006), the expansion of Anxiety Disorder diagnoses from
three in DSM-I (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1952) and DSM-II (APA, 1965) to
25 (including subtypes and specifiers) in DSMIV-TR (APA, 2000), has not yielded substantially unique treatments designed to target the
specific features of these diagnoses. Rather,
cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies incorporating exposure and cognitive techniques, as
well as pharmacological agents impacting the
serotonergic system, appear to be similarly efficacious across the Anxiety Disorders when administered in similar doses, regardless of specific diagnosis (Norton & Price, 2007; Hofmann
& Smits, 2008; AccessPharmacy, accessed
08/10/2011).
As a result, and in response to constraints
imposed in attempting to train and deliver multiple CBT treatment programs for specific diagnoses, several investigators (Barlow, Farchione, et al., 2011; Erickson, Janeck, &
Tallman, 2007; Norton, 2012b; Schmidt, Buckner, Pusser, Woolaway-Bickel, & Preston, 2012)
have developed transdiagnostic CBT programs
in order to minimize training demands and
maximize treatment accessibility for individuals
with anxiety disorders. The current paper will
discuss in detail the development and evaluation
of one of the most thoroughly studied transdiagnostic treatments for anxiety disorders.
TRANSDIAGNOSTIC GROUP CBT FOR
ANXIETY DISORDER: DESCRIPTION OF
THE PROGRAM
In 2002, Norton and Hope (unpublished
draft; now published as Norton, 2012b) began
developing a transdiagnostic group CBT program in response to two emerging factors. First,
considerable data had been mounting from genetic (Andrews, 1991; Andrews, Stewart, Allen,
& Henderson, 1990; Andrews, Stewart, MorrisYates, Holt, & Henderson, 1990; Jang, 2005;
Jardin, Martin, & Henderson, 1984; Kendler,
Heath, Martin, & Eaves, 1987; Kendler, Neale,
Kessler, Heath, & Eaves, 1992), personality
(Clark & Watson, 1991; Eysenck, 1957; Gray,
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 206
1982; Spielberger, 1985), developmental
(Bowlby, 1980; Chorpita & Barlow, 1998;
Chorpita, Brown, & Barlow, 1998; Rosenbaum,
2000; Thompson, 2001), psychopathological
(Andrews, Stewart, et al., 1990; Brown & Barlow, 1992; Sanderson, Di Nardo, Rapee, & Barlow, 1990), and interventional research (Norton
& Price, 2007; Hofmann & Smits, 2008) suggesting that the commonalities across the anxiety disorder diagnoses outweighed the differences (see Norton, 2009). That is, an individual
with social anxiety disorder, an individual with
agoraphobia, and an individual with a specific
phobia of heights, only differ in the specific
phenomenon that elicits their fear and anxiety,
while the common factors underlying and maintaining the fears are the same.
Second, they found that their ability to provide timely clinical services was impaired by
an unusual conundrum: patient flow was too
high to provide immediate individual CBT to
all clients with an anxiety disorder who requested treatment, but patient flow with any
specific anxiety disorder diagnosis was too slow
to provide timely group CBT for those diagnoses. Indeed, as noted by Norton and Hope
(2008), «assuming that all new intakes had an
anxiety disorder, it would still require (based on
National Comorbidity Survey prevalence estimates) an average 21 intakes before one would
expect to have recruited 6 individuals with a
primary diagnosis of specific phobia to form the
group. It would require 25 intakes for a sixperson social phobia group, 31 intakes for a
panic/agoraphobia group, 50 intakes for a PTSD
group, 53 intakes for a GAD group, and 199
intakes for an OCD group» (p. 14). In contrast,
a transdiagnostic group CBT approach would
allow for groups to begin as soon as a sufficient
number of patients with any anxiety disorder
(e.g., 2 patients with panic disorder, 2 with social anxiety disorder, 2 with generalized anxiety
disorder, 1 with OCD, and 1 with PTSD).
The transdiagnostic group CBT program
(Norton, 2012b; for a group case study, see
Norton & Hope, 2008) consists of 12 weekly
2-hour group sessions incorporating six to
eight individuals with any anxiety disorder
diagnosis. Groups are typically led by two
therapists, although they have been success-
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
207
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
fully implemented by one experienced therapist on several occasions, and emphasize an
overarching philosophy that clients have an
excessive or irrational fear of a particular
thing (e.g., heights, negative evaluation) as
opposed to having diagnoses of panic disorder,
OCD, etc. In this way, all clients are seen as
sharing the same basic pathology, even though
the specific stimuli that trigger the anxiety and
the behavioral responses to reduce danger or
threat may differ. The group treatment incorporates psychoeducation into the development
and maintenance of anxiety, cognitive restructuring of excessive or irrational thoughts underlying the anxiety disorder, graduated exposure and response prevention, cognitive
restructuring of core beliefs underlying anxiety, and termination and relapse prevention
skills (see Table 1).
Table 1. Session-by-session overview of the Transdiagnostic Group CBT program.
Session
1
2
Session Content
Assigned Homework
10
Psychoeducation and group socialization
Psychoeducation and introduction of
cognitive restructuring
Cognitive restructuring
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Graduated in-session exposure and response prevention
Cognitive restructuring of core beliefs
11
Cognitive restructuring of core beliefs
12
Termination and relapse prevention
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Prior to Session 1
Before initiating treatment, patients are
asked to develop a Fear Hierarchy with a therapist to help guide the treatment. The Fear Hierarchy is a simple list of up to ten situations
or stimuli that provoke their anxiety. Hierarchies should ideally comprise a range of situations and stimuli ideographic to that individual, and should address not only situations or
stimuli associated with the principal diagnoses
but also situations or stimuli associated with
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 207
Self-monitoring of anxiety (ongoing)
Monitoring of anxious thoughts
Challenging anxious thoughts (ongoing)
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Self-directed exposure and response
prevention
Monitoring negative-mood inducing core
beliefs
Challenging negative mood-inducing core
beliefs
Implementing post-treatment self-therapy plan (ongoing)
comorbid anxiety diagnoses. For example, if
an individual presented with a principal diagnosis of social phobia and a comorbid diagnosis of OCD, his or her hierarchy might consist
of items addressing public speaking and assertiveness (social phobia) as well as contamination and washing (OCD). If possible, variations that make each situation or stimuli more
or less anxiety provoking, such as going to a
crowded versus relatively deserted mall, should
be included.
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07
208
Peter J. Norton
Session 1
The first session, which is typically more
didactic in structure than the subsequent sessions, is designed to socialize clients to the
group format and allow clients to feel more
comfortable sharing their personal difficulties.
Issues such as attendance, homework completion, confidentiality, and respecting the group
members and process (e.g., allowing everyone
to contribute) are emphasized. Much of the rest
of the session focuses on providing education
about the nature of anxiety and anxiety disorder; the cognitive, behavioral, and physiological
components of anxiety. An emphasis is placed
on normalizing the experience of anxiety, in that
anxiety disorders are not a «malfunctioning» of
the anxiety and fear systems, but rather their
inappropriate activation to stimuli that are either
not dangerous or much less dangerous than the
individual feels. The three components of anxiety-physiological activation, cognitive shifts
toward evidence of danger or threat, and behavioral escape/avoidance motivations-are described to assist the clients in becoming impartial observers of their own anxiety (see Figure 1).
Clients are encouraged to describe their own
experiences of anxiety, including the triggers
that provoke their fears, in an effort to highlight
the commonalities and differences in the group’s
experience of anxiety and to promote group
cohesion. Finally, therapists briefly describe the
components of treatment: Education/Self-Monitoring, Specific Cognitive Restructuring, Graduated Exposure, and Generalized Cognitive
Restructuring, emphasizing that each component of treatment will require work both in session and at home. Daily self-monitoring of
anxiety levels and monitoring the three components of anxiety during a specific anxiety-provoking episode are assigned as homework.
Daily self-monitoring is assigned to (a) provide
ongoing evaluation of progress throughout
treatment, (b) potentially identify previously
unknown variables that may exacerbate or mitigate each client’s anxiety, and (c) help the clients become an observer, rather than just an
experiencer, of their anxiety. Monitoring the
three components during an episode of anxiety
is assigned to provide specific client examples
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 208
to be utilized during the introduction to cognitive restructuring in the second session.
Cognitive
Attention shift to
perceived dangers
Activation of threatrelevant memories
Physiological
Increased heart rate,
muscle tension,
respiration, sweating,
etc.
Behavioral
Motivation to escape
or avoid the perceived
threat, behavioral
rituals to minimize
danger
Figure 1. Model of the interaction between cognitions,
behaviors, and physiological responses.
Session 2
The second session focuses primarily on the
cognitive component of anxiety. A model is
presented that highlights the fact that it is not
the stimulus that provokes anxiety, but rather
the individual’s interpretation of the stimulus as
dangerous or threatening. An example of a
household smoke detector is often a good analogy. Should a smoke detector sound its alarm
when, for example, someone is cooking bacon,
the smoke detector is functioning properly but
simply alerting the homeowner of danger when
the actual threat is low. This idea is used to introduce the concept of automatic thoughts—
over-exaggerated or irrational thoughts of danger or threat that seem to arise automatically
when encountering or anticipating the stimuli
or situation that a client fears. An example of a
hypothetical client is typically provided (e.g., a
client with health anxiety concerns that a headache is a sign of a potential stroke) to help clients understand that although the threat feels
likely to the individual, there are many more
likely interpretations (e.g., the headache could
be due to stress, poor sleep, a hangover, etc.).
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
Clients are then encouraged to identify their
own automatic thoughts from commonly occurring situations where they experience anxiety;
Probes such as «what did you worry might happen if…,» «what might have happened…,» or
«what is the worst that could have happened»
may be necessary to elicit automatic thoughts
until clients become comfortable with the process of identifying automatic thoughts.
As some clients have difficulty in identifying
their own automatic thoughts, clients are given
strategies for identifying these thoughts in anxiety-provoking situations, such as asking oneself «what am I worried will happen?» whenever they experience a sudden increase in their
anxiety or fear. For homework, clients are asked
to monitor and record automatic thoughts
throughout the week to provide specific individualized examples that can be discussed and
challenged during the third session. Clients are
also encouraged to continue the daily self-monitoring of their anxiety.
Session 3
The third session continues with cognitive
strategies in preparation for subsequent sessions
that focus on graduated exposure. Automatic
thoughts from the previous session homework
are reviewed, and the concept of thinking errors
is introduced. In this program, Over-Estimation
of Probabilities and Catastrophizing the Consequences are specifically highlighted, as they
capture the majority of the common misappraisals. Over-estimation of probabilities involves
predicting that a feared outcome is likely to
occur despite the actual probability being quite
low, such as assuming that it is likely one’s
airplane will crash. Catastrophizing the consequences, in contrast, involves assuming the
worst possible negative feared outcome for
something that typically has a more benign
consequence, such as fearing that doing something embarrassing will lead to complete rejection and being alone forever.
In the group, clients are asked to examine
their automatic thoughts to identify thinking
errors, which allows other group members to
offer input to those clients who may have more
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 209
209
fixed assumptions (e.g., mistaken beliefs in the
dangerousness of spiders). Finally, disputing
questions designed to assess the actual degree
of threat or danger are posed and practiced.
Examples of commonly used disputing questions include What evidence do I have that
______ is true/What evidence do I have that
______ is not true? (e.g., What evidence do I
have that people are laughing at me/What evidence do I have that people are not laughing at
me?) and If ____________ did happen, how
bad would it be? (e.g., If I did vomit, how bad
would it be?). For homework between sessions,
clients are asked to practice and record a full
trial of cognitive restructuring of at least one
anxiety-producing situation, from identification
of automatic thoughts, through identification of
thinking errors, to challenging the logic of the
automatic thought.
Sessions 4 to 9
Sessions 4 through 9 focus on graduated
exposure based on each patient’s Fear Hierarchy. Each week, clients will undertake an insession exposure of increasing difficulty, whether in vivo (e.g., touching a surface believed to
be contaminated), through simulation (e.g.,
roleplaying a social interaction), or imaginally
(e.g., e.g., cognitive exposure to trauma memories). Prior to each exposure, clients are instructed to use their cognitive restructuring
skills to prepare for the exposure. Immediately
prior to the beginning of an exposure, the client
and therapist should negotiate one or more attainable but challenging behavioral goals that
the client should attempt to achieve during the
exposure. During all exposures, behavioral
strategies designed to reduce anxiety, such as
avoidance or compulsive rituals, are identified
and prevented during the exposure. During each
exposure, the therapists periodically probe for
the client’s current level of anxiety (e.g., on a
0-100 scale) to assess the degree to which the
exposure is activating the client’s fears and the
extent to which the client is habituating during
the exposure. The exposure should continue as
long as is necessary for the SUDS ratings to
climax and begin declining.
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07
210
Peter J. Norton
During the first few exposure sessions, most
exposures are done individually and sequentially to ensure that they are completed successfully; that is, the therapists will do an exposure
with Client A, followed by an exposure with
Client B, and so forth. However, in later exposure sessions, exposures among group members
may be combined. As noted in Norton (2012b):
For example, in a past group we have paired
up two clients who both had public speaking
fears and had them engage in a formal debate
over an innocuous topic. In another group, the
clients themselves creatively designed an exposure wherein four clients were able to confront
their fears simultaneously. The group left the
clinic and walked to a nearby office tower that
had a busy cafeteria in it. One socially anxious
client made a point to ask multiple strangers in
the building for directions to the cafeteria. Another client with claustrophobic fears rode the
office elevator up and down multiple floors by
herself while a third client, who had concerns that
people would be watching her, sat by herself for
10 minutes at a table in the middle of the cafeteria. Finally, a fourth client who had contamination fears touched four surfaces in the cafeteria
that he felt might not be clean and refrained from
washing his hands. (Norton, 2012b; p. 153)
At the conclusion of each exposure session,
patients are assigned homework exposures
based on the in-session exposure to practice
multiple times between sessions in an effort to
promote generalization.
(Over-Estimation of Probabilities and Catastrophizing the Consequences) and challenged
using disputing questions. Although the process is similar to that used on specific automatic thoughts in session 3, core beliefs are
typically more firmly entrenched and will usually require a longer period of self-challenging
before substantial shifts are observed. Cognitive restructuring homework is assigned following both sessions.
Session 12
Finally, during the twelfth session, treatment
skills and progress are reviewed, and plans for
termination and post-treatment maintenance of
gains are developed. Clients are encouraged to
reflect on the gains they have made throughout
the treatment, and to consider anxiety-relevant
ways they can reward themselves. For example,
one former group member who overcame substantial agoraphobia rewarded herself by booking a vacation flight—she had not been on an
airplane for years due to her fears—to visit
family members who lived in another state.
Strategies for dealing with stressors and lapses
are developed and practiced, and plans for addressing possible return of fears are developed.
Finally, plans for continued self-therapy are
developed, such as incorporating self-exposure
into one’s ongoing lifestyle.
Sessions 10 and 11
TREATMENT EFFICACY ON PRINCIPAL
ANXIETY DISORDER DIAGNOSES
During the tenth and eleventh sessions, the
emphasis shift back to cognitions, but with a
focus on broader beliefs and schemas underlying the specific fears. Examples of common
beliefs or schema have included a belief that
anything short of perfection is a failure, a belief that one must always please others to be
loved, or a belief that one does not have the
skills to cope in a dangerous world. Cognitive
restructuring skills akin to those developed in
sessions 2 and 3 are employed to begin to soften these broadly held beliefs. Beliefs are examined for any evidence of thinking errors
This transdiagnostic group CBT program
has been subjected to a considerable amount
of empirical research. To begin the empirical
evaluation of transdiagnostic group CBT, Norton and Hope (2005) conducted a randomized
clinical trial with 23 participants assigned to
either transdiagnostic CBT or a waitlist control
condition during which the participants did not
receive treatment until after the first treatment
groups had finished. All participants met DSMIV criteria for a principal anxiety disorder diagnosis, and the following inclusion criteria
were established: (1) Age 19 or older, (2) Abil-
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 210
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
ity to read and communicate in English, (3)
Willingness to accept possibility of randomization to delayed-treatment condition, (4) No
evidence of dementia or neurocognitive conditions, and (5) No evidence of suicidality, significant substance abuse, or other condition
requiring immediate intervention. Comorbid
diagnoses of any kind were acceptable as long
as the principal diagnosis was an anxiety disorder. Post-treatment results showed that outcomes on clinician-rated severity (M PRE =
5.44, M POST = 3.04 on a 0-8 scale versus M PRE
= 6.45, M POST = 6.07 for waitlist controls),
proportion of remitted anxiety disorder diagnoses (67% versus 0% among waitlist controls), and idiographic fear-avoidance hierarchies (M PRE = 70.49, M POST = 37.71 on a 0-100
scale versus M PRE = 67.46, M POST = 62.68 for
waitlist controls) were superior for patients
receiving treatment as compared to waitlist
controls.
In a follow-up to the initial study, Norton
(2008) conducted an open clinical trial with 52
participants with a principal anxiety disorder
diagnosis. Inclusion criteria were identical to
the previous (Norton & Hope, 2005) study, with
the exception that all participants received immediate transdiagnostic group CBT. Using
mixed-effect regression modeling of sessionby-session anxiety severity assessments, Norton
(2008) found significant average decreases over
the course of treatment such that participants
tended to fall outside of the clinical severity
range by the end of treatment (M Session 1 = 48.01,
M POST = 34.92 on a 20-80 clinical scale). Notably, the results also found no interaction of the
treatment effects with diagnosis indicating no
differences in improvement for participants
with differing anxiety disorder diagnoses (e.g.,
panic disorder, OCD, etc.).
COMPARATIVE TREATMENT EFFICACY
WITH ESTABLISHED ANXIETY
DISORDER TREATMENTS
Given the establishment that transdiagnostic
group CBT was associated with significant
anxiety reduction, and that no diagnoses were
associated with differential improvement, two
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 211
211
comparative outcome trials were undertaken. In
the first (Norton, 2012a), 87 participants with
an anxiety disorder diagnosis were recruited
and randomized to either transdiagnostic group
CBT or a group applied relaxation training intervention. Again, inclusion criteria were liberally set to maximize external validity: (1) age
18 or older, (2) ability to read and communicate
in English, (3) willingness to accept possibility
of randomization to transdiagnostic group CBT
or group applied relaxation training, (4) no
evidence of dementia or neurocognitive conditions, and (5) no evidence of suicidality, significant substance abuse, or other condition
requiring immediate intervention. Analysis of
the treatment data using treatment non-inferiority/equivalence methodology suggested
equivalent improvement across those receiving
transdiagnostic group CBT and those receiving
group applied relaxation training, with between
group effect sizes all less than η2 = .029. Further, and consistent with the results of Norton
(2008), no effects of primary anxiety disorder
diagnosis were observed, suggesting that individuals with differing specific anxiety diagnoses showed similar improvement.
Subsequently, Norton and Barrera (2012)
conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of transdiagnostic group
CBT in contrast to diagnosis-specific group
CBT, including the Craske and Barlow (2007)
Mastery of your Anxiety and Panic (4th ed.)
protocol for panic disorder, the Heimberg and
Becker (20002) Cognitive-Behavioral Group
Therapy for Social Phobia protocol for social
anxiety disorder, and the Dugas and Robichaud
(2007) Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for
Generalized Anxiety Disorder protocol for
GAD. Forty-six individuals with a principal
diagnosis of panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, or generalized anxiety disorder who met
the same inclusion criteria as the previous trial
were randomly assigned to transdiagnostic or
diagnosis-specific group CBT. Analyses were
again conducted using a treatment equivalence/
non-inferiority methodology, and largely found
equivalence in outcomes between the transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific CBT formats,
with between groups effect sizes all less than
η2 = .052.
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07
212
Peter J. Norton
EFFECT OF TRANSDIAGNOSTIC GROUP
CBT ON COMORBID DIAGNOSES
Traditional CBT delivered for specific diagnoses has repeatedly shown indirect effects on
comorbid anxiety and depressive diagnoses
(e.g., Allen et al., 2010; Brown, Antony, & Barlow, 1995; Tsao et al., 1998, 2002, 2005), although such effects have been fairly modest
with only approximately 41.4% of individuals
with comorbid emotional diagnoses showing
remittance of these comorbid diagnoses at posttreatment (21.4% to 57.1%; see Norton, Barrera, Mathew, Chamberlain, Szafranski, et al.,
in press). However, Mansell, Harvey, Watkins,
and Shafran (2009), McEvoy, Nathan, and Norton (2009), and McManus, Shafran, and Cooper
(2010) have all proposed that transdiagnostic
CBT may hold an advantage over diagnosisspecific CBT in reducing comorbidity, as the
patients’ entire anxiety presentation is targeted
as opposed to only the features of one diagnosis.
To test this, Norton, Hayes, and Hope (2004)
conducted a secondary analysis of the Norton
and Hope (2005) data and found significant
decreases in depressed mood for clients undergoing transdiagnostic treatment for anxiety
when compared to waitlist control participants.
Seventy-five percent of participants with a comorbid depressive disorder receiving transdiagnostic group CBT showed remittance of their
depressive diagnoses to subclinical levels,
whereas no change in depressive severity occurred for those in the waitlist control condition. Similarly, substantial improvement on selfreport indices of depressive severity was
observed for those receiving immediate treatment whereas no change was observed for waitlist controls.
Similarly, Norton et al (in press) reanalyzed
data from participants assigned to the transdiagnostic group CBT condition in the Norton
(2008), Norton (2012a), and Norton and Barrera (2012) clinical trials. Consistent with diagnosis-specific treatment trials, a majority of
clients (64.6%) had at least one comorbid disorder, and a substantially higher percentage
(66.7%) of participants receiving transdiagnostic group CBT showed full remittance of all
comorbid diagnoses than is typical with diag-
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 212
nosis-specific CBT (48.5%). Similarly superior
effects on comorbid diagnoses have also been
reported following completion of other transdiagnostic CBT programs (see Ellard et al.,
2010).
PROCESS OF CHANGE IN
TRANSDIAGNOSTIC GROUP CBT
Given the strong efficacy data, both on primary outcomes as well as comorbid diagnoses,
research on transdiagnostic group CBT has
increasingly begun to examine the processes
and mechanisms underlying the treatment and
its outcomes. Norton, Klenck, and Barrera
(2010), for example, examined the trajectories
of improvement throughout the course of the
12-week transdiagnostic group CBT. Although
the majority of participants evidenced steady
incremental improvement across sessions,
roughly one-fifth of clients experienced at least
one sudden gain, defined as a large and relatively stable decrease in symptoms between
subsequent sessions. These participants who
experienced a sudden gain showed greater
overall improvement following treatment than
did clients who did not experience a sudden
gain. Interestingly, those who experienced a
sudden gain showed greater cognitive shifts
(i.e., greater awareness of the irrationality of
their anxious thoughts or greater acceptance of
alternative non-anxious interpretations) in the
pregain session than did those not showing a
sudden gain.
Norton, Hayes, and Springer (2008) questioned the extent to which the transdiagnostic
approach impacted upon therapeutic processes, such as group cohesion, treatment credibility, or therapeutic alliance. They examined
treatment process variables from a sample of
54 individuals with an anxiety disorder diagnosis who participated in the Norton (2008)
clinical trial. Results suggested strong and
increasing therapist therapeutic alliance and
group cohesion throughout treatment at levels
similar to those seen in trials of diagnosisspecific CBT. Furthermore, stronger alliance
and cohesion were generally related to better
outcomes.
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
Chamberlain and Norton (in press) examined the extent to which the diagnostic composition of the CBT groups might impact the cohesiveness of the group as well as the efficacy
of the treatment, as it is possible that patients
in more diagnostically homogeneous groups
may identify more closely with each other. Individual indices of diagnostic composition
based upon the number of group members sharing similar anxiety disorder diagnoses were
employed to explore potential differences in
treatment outcome related to the diagnostic
makeup of the treatment group. Results indicated that the diagnostic makeup of the treatment group had little, if any, impact on individual treatment outcome, suggesting that
transdiagnostic CBT groups can be formed
efficiently without concern for the specific
anxiety disorder diagnoses of those being enrolled in each group.
Finally, Smith, Norton, and McLean (in
press) conducted an analysis of data from participants in the Norton (2008), Norton (2012a),
and Norton and Barrera (2012) studies to examine patient perceptions of the aspects of
therapy that they felt were most beneficial. Although all aspects of treatment were favorably
rated by the patients, treatment response was
significantly correlated with perceived helpfulness of cognitive restructuring and exposures,
but not other treatment factors, suggesting that
those patients who improved the most identified
the active ingredients of CBT as the most beneficial. Indeed, the importance of graduated
exposure and response prevention in transdiagnostic group CBT was highlighted by Norton,
Hayes, and Klenck (2011). They analyzed the
impact of activation and habituation during
within-session exposures on subsequent between-session anxiety reduction among clients
with a range of anxiety disorders. Results revealed patients who experienced a poorer first
exposure (i.e., clients not habituating or increasing in anxiety) were significantly more likely to
subsequently discontinue treatment, while those
experiencing successful later exposures where
larger increases and decreases in anxiety during
the exposure (i.e., activation and habituation)
were generally associated with better treatment
outcomes.
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 213
213
OTHER TRANSDIAGNOSTIC CBT
PROGRAMS FOR ANXIETY
In addition to the works described above,
several other psychological research teams have
independently developed similar transdiagnostic CBT programs for the treatment of anxiety
and emotional disorders, although the extent of
the evidence base supporting the efficacy of
these treatments varies considerably (see Norton & Philipp, 2008 for a quantitative review).
The most extensively investigated of these alternative transdiagnostic CBT programs is that
of Barlow, Farchione, Fairholme, Ellard, Boisseau, et al. (2011), called the Unified Protocol
(UP). UP is an emotion-focused individual CBT
for the broad range of anxiety and mood disorders, although the majority of the research into
the efficacy of UP has focused on individuals
with anxiety disorder diagnoses (Ellard et al.,
2010). Prior to beginning UP, a brief Motivational Interviewing module is delivered, followed by five modules to be delivered over a
maximum of 18 one-hour sessions: Increasing
present-focused emotional awareness; Facilitating flexibility in cognitive appraisals; Identifying and preventing maladaptive behavioral
and emotional avoidance; Increasing tolerance
of emotion-related physiological sensations;
and Interoceptive and situational exposures to
emotional cues. Termination and relapse prevention skills are provided at the completion of
the UP protocol. Ellard et al. (2010) reported
significant improvement on anxiety and functioning during two open trials of UP, particularly after modifying the protocol in response
to the first trial. Farchione et al. (2012) reported
on a randomized clinical trial of UP in comparison to a waitlist control condition, finding
that those receiving UP showed significant improvement on indices of anxiety severity, depressive symptoms, and negative and positive
affectivity. The Unified Protocol therapist manual (Barlow, Farchione, et al., 2011) and client
workbook (Barlow, Ellard, et al., 2011) are available for purchase.
McEvoy and Nathan (2007) reported data
from a trial of a transdiagnostic group CBT
protocol for anxiety and affective disorders. The
group treatment program, which typically in-
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07
214
Peter J. Norton
cludes 8 to 10 patients, occurs over 10 weekly
2-hour sessions followed by an individual
booster session one month later. The protocol
covers psychoeducation about anxiety and depression, behavioral activation and graded exposure, calming techniques, and cognitive restructuring skills. Each session also included
weekly goal setting and review of homework,
as well as an emphasis on the regular use of
calming techniques. McEvoy and Nathan found
that patients in their transdiagnostic group CBT
program showed a similar degree of improvement to what was seen in studies of diagnosisspecific CBT. The protocol (Nathan, Rees, &
Smith, 2001) is available for purchase through
the authors.
Schmidt and colleagues (2012) recently reported efficacy data for a transdiagnostic group
CBT program entitled False Safety Behavior
Elimination Therapy (F-SET; Schmidt & Woolaway-Bickel, 2002) for individuals diagnosed
with panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, or
generalized anxiety disorder. F-SET is comprised of 10 weekly 2-hour group sessions. During the initial sessions, clients are educated
about the importance of thoughts and behaviors
in anxiety disorders, with a specific focus on
what Schmidt and Woolaway-Bickel refer to as
False Safety Behaviors—behaviors used to reduce perceptions of danger despite the actual
degree of threat being low. During subsequent
sessions, false safety behaviors are reduced or
eliminated while clients are encouraged to engage in activities that are opposite to their anxious tendencies. The results of the Schmidt et
al. (2012) clinical trial found that, compared to
participants randomly assigned to a waitlist
control condition, participants receiving F-SET
showed significant improvements across of
range of indices of anxiety severity, when delivered by relatively inexperienced clinicians.
The public availability of the F-SET protocol is
currently unknown.
Erickson, Janeck, and Tallman (2007) reported data from a randomized clinical trial
assessing the efficacy of a transdiagnostic group
CBT protocol for Mixed Anxiety Groups
(MAG), which was based on a previous transdiagnostic CBT protocol (Erickson, 2003). The
initial protocol was developed to be fully trans-
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 214
diagnostic across the anxiety disorders, although
Erickson et al. (2009) later suggested restriction
to patients with principal diagnoses of panic
disorder, social anxiety disorder, generalized
anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. The MAG
protocol consists of 11 weekly sessions, each
lasting 2 hours. Groups are larger than in the
other transdiagnostic group CBT programs, consisting of up to 12 clients. During sessions 1 and
2, clients develop a fear hierarchy and practice
goal setting, while session 3 involves the introduction of in vivo exposure, cognitive reappraisal, interoceptive exposure, and scheduled worry
time. During sessions 4 and 5, and again during
session 8, diaphragmatic breathing and progressive muscle relaxation are introduced and practiced, while sessions 6, 7, and 9 involve identifying and challenging automatic thoughts. Finally,
during sessions 10 and 11, strategies for relapse
prevention are developed and termination issues
are discussed. The results of their clinical trial
indicated that those receiving transdiagnostic
group CBT improved more than participants
randomized to delayed treatment waitlist control
condition. The public availability of the MAG
protocol is currently unknown.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE
DIRECTIONS
Overall, the evidence to date strongly converges in support of the efficacy of transdiagnostic CBT for the treatment of anxiety disorders. All of the trials showed signif icant
reductions in the severity of anxiety among
those receiving transdiagnostic CBT (e.g.,
Norton & Hope, 2005), and no evidence that
any specific anxiety disorder diagnoses respond less favorably to these treatments (Norton, 2008). Two trials (Norton, 2012 and Norton & Barrera, 2012, respectively) have found
that transdiagnostic CBT is equally efficacious
as applied relaxation training and traditional
diagnosis-specif ic CBT when considering
principal diagnoses, and possibly more so
through their apparent greater impact on comorbid anxiety and depressive diagnoses
(Norton et al., 2004; Norton et al., in press).
Interestingly, despite initial concerns over the
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
feasibility of combining individuals with fears
of different stimuli in the same treatment
group, several studies (Chamberlain & Norton,
in press; Norton, Hayes, & Springer, 2008)
have shown no impact of the diagnostically
mixed groups on either group cohesion or on
outcomes, and patients typically report favorable impressions of the treatment (Norton,
Hayes, & Springer, 2008; Smith, Norton, &
McLean, in press).
Of course, more research needs to be conducted and, in some cases is underway. Most
notably, the findings of equivalent outcomes
between transdiagnostic and diagnosis-specific CBT need to be replicated in additional
samples. Ideally, such trials should be conducted by other independent research teams, as
all of the published outcome studies have involved the treatment developers and therefore
their data may have been influenced by allegiance effects. Similarly, the data suggesting
higher rates of remission for comorbid diagnoses following transdiagnostic CBT than is
typically seen in diagnosis-specific CBT (Norton et al., in press) needs to be directly evaluated in a comparative outcome trial. Finally,
representation of individuals with principal
diagnoses of obsessive-compulsive disorder
and post-traumatic stress disorder in these trials has been limited, either by design (Schmidt
et al., 2012) or as a consequence of patient flow
(Norton, 2008); therefore future trials are necessary to establish the appropriateness of transdiagnostic CBT among individuals with these
diagnoses. Finally, the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of transdiagnostic CBT
when implemented in general clinical practice
in the community has not been systematically
evaluated, and remains a key area for future
research. Even so, the research conducted and
published to date show excellent promise for
transdiagnostic approaches to CBT for anxiety
disorders.
REFERENCES
AccessPharmacy (accessed 08/10/2011). Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach, 8e > Section 7.
Psychiatric Disorders > Chapter 79. Anxiety Disorders
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 215
215
I: Generalized Anxiety, Panic, and Social Anxiety Disorders. McGraw/Hill.
AccessPharmacy (accessed 08/10/2011). Pharmacotherapy: A Pathophysiologic Approach, 8e > Section 7.
Psychiatric Disorders > Chapter 80. Anxiety Disorders
II: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. McGraw/Hill.
Allen, L. B., White, K. S., Barlow, D. H., Shear, K. M.,
Gorman, J. M., & Woods, S. W (2010). Cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for panic disorder: Relationship
of anxiety and depression comorbidity with treatment
outcome. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral
Assessment, 32, 185-192.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and
statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed., text
rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1965). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (1952). Diagnostic and
statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington,
D.C.: Author.
Andrews, G. (1991). Anxiety, personality, and anxiety disorders. International Review of Psychiatry, 3, 293-302.
Andrews, G., Stewart, G. W., Allen, R., & Henderson, A.
S. (1990). The genetics of six neurotic disorders: A
twin study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 19, 23-29.
Andrews, G., Stewart, G. W., Morris-Yates, A., Holt, P. E.,
& Henderson, A. S. (1990). Evidence for a general
neurotic syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 157,
6-12.
Barlow, D.H., Ellard, K.K., Fairholme, C.P., Farchione,
T.J., Boisseau, C.L. Allen, L.B. & Ehrenreich-May, J.
(2011). The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Client workbook. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Barlow, D. H., Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K.
K., Boisseau, C. L. Allen, L. B. & Ehrenreich-May, J.
(2011). The unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide. New
York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss, sadness, and depression. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, T. A., Antony, M. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1995).
Diagnostic comorbidity in panic disorder: Effect on
treatment outcome and course of comorbid diagnoses
following treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 408-418.
Brown, T. A. & Barlow, D. H. (1992). Comorbidity among
anxiety disorders: Implications for treatment and DSMIV. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60,
835-844.
Chamberlain, L. D. & Norton, P. J. (in press). The impact of
diagnostic heterogeneity on outcomes in transdiagnostic
group CBT for anxiety. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07
216
Peter J. Norton
Chorpita, B. F. & Barlow, D. H. (1998). The development
of anxiety: The role of control in the early environment.
Psychological Bulletin, 124, 3-21.
Chorpita, B. F., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1998).
Perceived control as a mediator of family environment
in etiological models of childhood anxiety. Behavior
Therapy, 29, 457-476.
Clark, L. A. & Watson, D. (1991). Tripartite model of
anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and
taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316-336.
Craske, M. G. & Barlow, D. H. (2007). Mastery of your
anxiety and panic (4th ed.). New York, Oxford; 2007.
Dugas, M. J. & Robichaud, M. (2007). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: From
science to practice. New York: Routledge.
Ellard, K. K., Fairholme, C. P., Boisseaux, C. L., Farchione, T. J., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). Unified protocol
for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Protocol development and initial outcome data.
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 17, 88-101.
Erickson, D. H. (2003). Group cognitive behavioural
therapy for heterogeneous anxiety disorders. Cognitive
Behaviour Therapy, 32, 179-186.
Erickson, D. H., Janeck, A., & Tallman, K. (2009). Transdiagnostic group CBT for anxiety: Clinical experience
and practical advice. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 34-43.
Erickson, D. H., Janeck, A. S., & Tallman, K. (2007). A
cognitive-behavioral group for patients with various
anxiety disorders. Psychiatric Services, 58, 1205-1211.
Eysenck, H. J. (1957). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria: An experimental application of modern learning
theory to psychiatry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Fairholme, C. P., Boisseau, C. L., Ellard, K. K., Ehrenreich, J. T., & Barlow, D. H. (2010). Emotions, emotion
regulation, and psychological treatment: A unified
perspective. In A. M. Kring & D. M. Sloan (Eds.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment. (pp. 283-309).
New York, NY US: Guilford Press.
Farchione, T. J., Fairholme, C. P., Ellard, K. K., Boisseau,
C. L., Thompson-Hollands, J., Carl, J. R., Gallagher,
M. & Barlow, D. H. (2012).The unified protocol for
the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders:
A randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 43,
666-678.
Gray, J. A. (1982). The neurobiology of anxiety. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Harvey, A.G., Watkings, E., Mansell, W. & Shafran, R.
(2004), Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: A transdiagnostic approach to
research and treatment. Oxford University Press.
Heimberg, R. G. & Becker, R. E. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia: Basic mech-
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 216
anisms and clinical strategies. New York: Guilford
Press.
Hofmann, S. G. & Smits, J. A. J. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Journal
of Clinical Psychiatry, 69, 621-632.
Jang, K. L. (2005). The behavioral genetics of psychopathology: A clinical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jardin, R., Martin, N. G., & Henderson, A. S. (1984).
Genetic covariation between neuroticism, and the
symptoms of anxiety and depression. Genetics Epidemiology, 1, 89-107.
Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L.
J. (1986). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in a
volunteer twin population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 213-221.
Kendler, K. S., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C.,
& Eaves, L. J. (1992). Major depression and generalized anxiety disorder: Same genes, (partly) different
environments? Archives of General Psychiatry, 49,
716-722.
Manning, J. J., Hooke, G. R., Tannenbaum, D. A., Blythe,
T. H., & Clarke, T. M. (1994). Intensive cognitivebehaviour group therapy for diagnostically heterogeneous groups of patients with psychiatric disorder.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 28,
667-674.
Mansell, W., Harvey, A., Watkins, E., & Shafran, R.
(2009). Conceptual foundations of the transdiagnostic
approach to CBT. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy:
An International Quarterly, 23, 6-19.
McEvoy, P. M., & Nathan, P. (2007). Effectiveness of
cognitive behaviour therapy for diagnostically heterogenous groups: A benchmarking study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 344-350.
McEvoy, P. M., Nathan, P., & Norton, P. J. (2009). Efficacy of transdiagnostic treatments: A review of published outcome studies and future research directions.
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 27-40.
McManus, F., Shafran, R., & Cooper, Z. (2010). What does
a ‘transdiagnostic’ approach have to offer the treatment
of anxiety disorders? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 491-505.
Nathan, P. R., Rees, C. S., & Smith, L. M. (2001). Mood
management course: A group cognitive behavioural
programme for anxiety disorders and depression. Perth,
Australia: Rioby. (Available from http://www.cci.
health.wa.gov.au/index.html)
Norton, P. J. (2012a). A randomized clinical trial of
transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder by comparison to relaxation training. Behavior Therapy, 43,
506-517.
Norton, P. J. (2012b). Group cognitive-behavioral therapy
of anxiety: A transdiagnostic treatment manual. New
York: Guilford.
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
10/12/12 09:07
Transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety disorder
Norton, P. J. (2009). Integrated psychological treatment of
multiple anxiety disorders. In: M. M. Antony and M.
B. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of anxiety and the anxiety
disorders. New York: Oxford.
Norton, P. J. (2008). An open trial of a transdiagnostic
cognitive-behavioral group therapy for anxiety disorder. Behavior Therapy, 39, 242-250.
Norton, P. J. (2006). Toward a clinically-oriented model
of anxiety disorders. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 35,
88-105.
Norton, P. J. & Barrera, T. L. (2012). Transdiagnostic
versus diagnosis-specific CBT for anxiety disorders: A
preliminary randomized controlled trial. Depression
and Anxiety, 29, 874-882.
Norton, P. J., Barrera, T. L., Mathew, A. R., Chamberlain,
L. D., Szafranski, D. D., Reddy, R., & Smith, A. H. (in
press). Effect of transdiagnostic CBT for anxiety on
comorbid diagnoses. Depression and Anxiety.
Norton, P. J., Hayes, S. A., & Hope, D. A. (2004). Effects
of a transdiagnostic group treatment for anxiety on
secondary depressive disorders. Depression and Anxiety,
20, 198-202.
Norton, P. J., Hayes, S. A., & Klenck, S. C. (2011). What
happens in session doesn’t stay in session: Changes
within exposures predict subsequent improvement and
dropout. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 654-660.
Norton, P. J., Hayes, S. A., & Springer, J. R. (2008). Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral group therapy for
anxiety: Outcome and process. International Journal
of Cognitive Therapy, 1, 266-279.
Norton, P. J. & Hope, D. A. (2008). The «Anxiety Treatment Protocol»: A Group Case Study Demonstration
of a Transdiagnostic Group CBT for Anxiety Disorders.
Clinical Case Studies, 7, 538-554.
Norton, P. J. & Hope, D. A. (2005). Preliminary evaluation
of a broad-spectrum cognitive-behavioral group therapy for anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 79-97.
Norton, P. J., Klenck, S. C., & Barrera, T. L. (2010). Sudden changes during cognitive behavioral group therapy
for anxiety disorders. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24,
887-892.
Norton, P. J. & Philipp, L. M. (2008). Transdiagnostic
approaches to the treatment of anxiety disorders: A
meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, and Training, 45, 214-226.
Norton, P. J. & Price, E. P. (2007). A meta-analytic review
of cognitive-behavioral treatment outcome across the
anxiety disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental
Disease, 195, 521-531.
© Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología
22784_Psicopatologia_17(3)_Cs6.indd 217
217
Rosenbaum, J. F. (March, 2000). Childhood origins of
panic disorder. In J. C. Ballenger & M. K. Shear
(Chairs), Milestones and the millennium series: Panic
disorder. Symposium presented at the 20 annual meeting of the Anxiety Disorders Association of America,
Washington, DC.
Sanderson, W. C., Di Nardo, P. A., Rapee, R. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1990). Syndrome comorbidity in patients
diagnosed with a DSM-III-R anxiety disorder. Journal
of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 308-312.
Schmidt, N. B., Buckner, J. D. Pusser, A., Woolaway-Bickel,
K., & Preston, J. L. (2012). Randomized controlled trial
of False Safety Behavior Elimination Therapy (F-SET):
A unified cognitive behavioral treatment for anxiety
psychopathology. Behavior Therapy, 43, 518-532.
Schmidt, N. B., & Woolaway-Bickel, K. (2002). Defeating
anxiety: False safety aid treatment (F-SET). Unpublished treatment manual.
Smith, A. H., Norton, P. J., & McLean, C. P. (in press).
Client perceptions of therapy component helpfulness
in group cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Speilberger, C. D. (1985). Anxiety, cognition and affect:
A state-trait perspective. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser
(Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 171-182).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taylor, S. & Clark, D. A. (2009). Transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatments for mood and anxiety disorders: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 3-5.
Thompson, R. A. (2001). Childhood anxiety disorders
from the perspective of emotion regulation and attachment. In M. W. Vasey & M. R. Dadds (Eds.), The developmental psychopathology of anxiety (pp. 160-182).
New York: Oxford University Press.
Tsao, J. C., Lewin, M. R., & Craske, M. G. (1998). The
effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder on comorbid conditions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 12, 357-371.
Tsao, J. C., Mystkowski, J. L., Zucker, B. G., & Craske,
M. G. (2002). Effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy
for panic disorder on comorbid conditions: Replication
and extension. Behavior Therapy, 33, 493-509.
Tsao, J. C., Mystkowski, J. L., Zucker, B. G., & Craske,
M. G. (2005). Impact of cognitive-behavioral therapy
for panic disorder on comorbidity: A controlled investigation. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 43, 959-970.
Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica 2012, Vol. 17 (3), 205-217
10/12/12 09:07