The Humanization of Poetry: An Appraisal of Gloria Fuertes Author(s): Maria L. Cooks Source: Hispania, Vol. 83, No. 3 (Sep., 2000), pp. 428-436 Published by: American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/346007 Accessed: 24/03/2010 13:55 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aatsp. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hispania. http://www.jstor.org 428 HISPANIA 83 SEPTEMBER2000 The Humanization of Poetry: An Appraisal of Gloria Fuertes MariaL. Cooks PurdueUniversity Abstract: GloriaFuertes is considereda leader in contemporarypeninsularpoetry,andyet a clear understandingof her poetics andof her uniquenesshas not been achieved.Her distinctivepoetics andpersonaare here consideredin the context of her relationshipto the peninsularpoets of her generationand the public thatshe creates.The formof her poems suggests that GloriaFuertestransformsour perceptionof poetryby demystifyingthe poet andby degentrifyingpoeticlanguage.Herpoemstypicallyareof a dualnature,a simple narrationwhich, at the same time, presents a literarytoposin a new light. Fuertes creates a new poetics by substitutingeach of the elementsof the poeticdiscourse,the text, the poet,andthe reader.She replacesthem withher ownpopularizedversions,thus creatinga powerfulpoeticstyle thatanswersthe quest of her generationfor a new aestheticsof poetry. Key Words: contemporarypeninsularpoetry, Fuertes (Gloria),poetic technique, displacement,humor, textuality,reversals,colloquialspeech cholars have pointed out the their time to a preoccupationwith poetic difficulty involved in trying to include the poetry of GloriaFuertes withinone of the largermovementsor tendencies of twentieth-century peninsular poetry.Debickiincludesher, with reservations, in the generation of 1956-71, and points out the differencesbetween her poetryandthatof her contemporariesin style, purpose,andtheme.1SylviaShernoconsiders the richness andvarietyof her themes to be her most salientcharacteristics2; others look for the obviouslinkbetween theories of feminismand the first woman contemporarypeninsularpoet to flaunther lesbianismin her writing.3Persin,Mandlove, andBrownesearchher poetictechniquefor clues thatshed lighton her uniquenessand her success in leadingthe latergenerations of postmodern peninsular poets. The present study focuses on the form of Fuertes'spoems andon the wayshe breaks awayfrom the existent poetic style to create a new poetic canon, more in tune with the languageandaspirationsof the Spainof the fifties. GloriaFuertes is generallyincludedin the generationof poets who shiftedfroma preoccupationwith the social injusticesof style and the role andfunctionof poetryin the post civil war era.4Aesthetics, the creativeprocess, and the search for a new poetic language that could engage an audience which,in general,had turnedits back on poetry,was the goal of this generation of poets. Poetryto ordinaryreaderswas incomprehensible,a literaryrelic,writtenby andforacademics,totallyirrelevantto their lives. GloriaFuertestook it uponherself to create a new poetics, more accessible to ordinarypeople or "the masses," as she calls her public.Fuertes clearlystatedthis point in an interviewwith PamelaCarmell published for AmericanPoetryReview:"I wantmy publicto be the masses.Andsometimes I sacrifice literary and oratorical peaks because I thinkthe peoplewon'tunderstandme" (5-6). This generationof the fifties,which also included Francisco Brines, Claudio Rodriguez, Angel Gonzalez, Carlos Sahaguin,Jose Angel Valente, and Jose AgustinGoytisolo,displayedconcernwith the social injustices of their time, but it would be a misnomerto call them "social poets."For most of them, the social issues of those years, althougha recurrenttheme THE HUMANIZATION OF POETRY: AN APPRAISAL OF GLORIA FUERTES 429 in their poems, are not the centralmotifof theirwork.Instead,they predictandanticipate the future shape of Spanish society, and seek to determinethe directionpoetry should take in this imminentfuture. A briefreviewof how otherpoets of this generation envisaged the role and the meaningof their poetrywill help us gain a better understandingof these issues. This is best done by interpretingstudies in poetics written by some of the poets themselves, and through a brief survey of how the criticssee these poets. Muchof the poetics of this generationis compiledin Pedro Provencio's anthologyPoeticas espanolas contemporaneas:"LaGeneracion del 50" (unfortunately,Gloria Fuertes is not included).The structureof this anthologyis based on the answersthe poets themselves give to questionsposed by the author,himself a poet of this generation.These questions can be summarizedintothree central inquiries: 1) Do you identifyyourselfwith or do you have strongaffinityfora specificpoeticgenerationor movement? 2) Whatdo you thinkthe functionof poetry should be todayin contemporarySpain? 3) How wouldyou define the featuresand functionof your own poetry? poetas (los del oficio, precisamente,de palabra)hablamos a un auditorio fantasmal. (Provencio, Poeticas...del 50: 172) Criticsfind it useful to apply"reader-response theory"when interpretingthe poetry of this generation.AndrewP. Debicki, one of the first critics to thoroughlystudy this period,admitsinthe prefaceofhis book ThePoetryofDiscoverythe difficultyhe had in interpretingthese poets untilhe adopted insights fromreaderresponse theory: In attemptingto find more effective methods of inquiry, I discovered that I could often make useful statementsaboutways in which these works established certain points of view for their speakers, adoptedcertainperspectives,andalso elicitedcertain responses in theirreaders.They did so less through traditionalpoeticdevicesthanthroughtone,intertextual references, and patterns of development that buildup andmodifyreaderexpectations.Inpursuing these discoveries, I was able to gain insights from recenttheoryon readerresponseas wellas fromsome criticismof fiction,as will become clear throughout this book. (PoetryofDiscoveryvii-viii) In searchingfor their audience,the poets developed a self-consciousness about the poeticword.The most commonthemes in their poems have to do with the nature of the creativeprocess, the search for the poetic,5the transformationof ordinarylanguage into poetic language, and the relationshipof this languageto the objectsthey describe.More than any othergeneration, they were concerned with finding a new rhetoric of poetry, one that would access those until now unspoken sensations capable of bringing forth new knowledge about ourselves and our world, as the followingverses by ClaudioRodriguezshow: A samplingof answersstronglyindicates that this is a generationnot only in search of a new poetic word,but also in search of an audience.Their mission is to make poetry playa role in the consciousness of the nation,to restore it to the central place it once had (e.g., in the MiddleAges) as the Comoavena voice of the people.An exampleof this can que se siembraa voleo y que no importa be found in the answersto the third quesque caigaaquio alli si cae en tion.Ratherthanaddressingthe featuresor tierra, functionof their poetry, the poets tend to va el contenidoardordel pensamiento point to their inability to clearly see a filtrandoseen las cosas, reader.Poetry,they say, is a genre nobody entreabriendolas, paradejarsu resplandor,y luego reads;you aretalkingto "yourself'as Frandarleuna nuevaclaridaden ellas. (Rodriguez15) cisco Brinessays (Provencio,Poeticas...del The poetsof this generationwereallvery 50: 156), or addressinga ghost, as Claudio it: aware that acquiring new insights much Rodriguezputs intothe natureof realityis the primaryfuncLos medios de difusi6nmasivatienen la palabra.Los tion of poeticdiscourse.6This noetic power 430 HISPANIA 83 SEPTEMBER2000 of poetryis conveyed,not in the contentor theme of the poem, but in the particular arrangementof the wordsin the poem. It is the form of the poem that creates new knowledge,knowledgethat can only exist in the peculiar unique arrangement of words and sounds that we recognize as a poet's style. For the modernist poet, the power of a poem resides in the way truth becomes the servantof language.The object or feeling embedded in a poem might be a very familiarone, but its significance is imperfectlyunderstooduntilit is revealed to us through the poem. It is less what is said that mattersin a poem, than how it is said.The first task for this generationwas to finda new languageforpoeticdiscourse, one less rhetoricaland closer to the ordinarylanguage of the averageperson. It is not a coincidence that Jose Agustin Goytisoloexpressed that perhapsa female voice would be better able to break away fromthe academic(male)poetic discourse of his generation.That marginal,intimate, feminine voice could become the strong leader of his generation. Fuertes, in fact, seems to be the answer to his poem "La mujerfuerte": Franciscahermosaanciana regresa al dulce hogar con alegriay esperanza. Su afanosocoraz6ndigno de epocas mejores- johel Medioevo con su respeto porlas nobles instituciones!saltaun paso otropaso arribahaciael acogedorrefugiode las chicas. iQuien cantaraalguindia con profundas palabras,quien,quiensera el poeta de los hechos cotidianosy an6nimosy los encumbrara desde su pequefieza los mas altos vuelos? (Provencio, Poeticas ... del 50: 12) Goytisolo was not the only one who yearnedfor the MiddleAges and the mystic poets, when poetry spoke in simple, direct, primitivelanguage the feelings and yearnings of the common person. These poets wanted a new language register for their poetry;they wanted"speech"to sub- stituteforthe "writtenword."Neverbefore had a generationof poets yearnedso much for the Tennysonianresolve "toutter"the thoughts that resided in them. But, unfortunately,they continuedwith the same poetic conventionsas before,butexpressedin a more direct, simple language.Their poetry continued to be addressed to other poets. Itwas stilla dialogueamongpoets in searchof the rightword,as illustratedhere by Francisco Brines's poem "Actos de supresion": eC6momostrarla imagende la vida? Habrade ser vertiginosa,fertil Y a la vez, arida.Lacreacion de las oscurassabanas:los cuerpos. Ficci6nvaciade apagarla fiebre, Suiplicade caloro pervivencia De un frio que es consciente; El acto infiel del apaciguamiento, Un derrumbadoencuentrodel infinito. (Insistenciasen Luzbel23) These poets search for,but cannotfind, a wayto humanizepoetry.They respondby adoptinga more simple language, and by discussing (in theory) what elements this poetry needs to have. But they do not change the stand of the speaker of the poem,who continuesto be a poettalkingto other poets about what poetry should be about.As one can see by the aboveexample describing the creative process, the language is ordinaryeverydaylanguage,but the theme of the poem is abstract.Unless readersarethemselvespoets or scholarsof poetry,they maynot reachthe level of mental abstractionrequiredby Brinesto understand this poem. The experience the speaker of this poem is describing, 'The anguishof confrontinga blankpage,"is too remote for most people to identify with. This poetrycontinuesto addressthe yearnings of the "official"poetics of the generation,not the strugglesandaspirationsof an ordinaryperson. It describes whatbeing a poet and writingpoetry is all about.It is a poetry about poets and addressed only to poets. In contrast, Gloria Fuertes refuses to enter this "forpoets only"dialogue,andinstead initiatesa new kind of dialogue:be- THE HUMANIZATION OF POETRY: AN APPRAISAL OF GLORIA FUERTES 431 tween herself and her readers.In orderto win the trust of her readers she has to present herself as a differentkind of poet: one more like a reader of poetry than a writer of poetry. In order to achieve this transformation,Gloria Fuertes creates a new mythology,andin doing so breaksentirely with the traditionalconventions of poetry. This new mythology is presented explicitlyin her collection"Aconsejocomer hilo"and implicitlyin the rest of her work thereafter. She presents herself as the daughter of a dressmaker (her mother's trade), and in doing so introduces a new working class mythologyinto the body of her poetry. The poet, like her intended reader,is a working-classpersonwho talks in plainlanguageabouther humblejob or aboutthe everydaydrudgeryof her life. In "DesdeSiempre,"GloriaFuertes says that she wrote her first poems in the kitchen with a "Singer,"referring to the popular brandof sewing machines: cated poet lacking poetic techniques, as Debicki (1994) well notes. Her "Poetica" places the ordinaryperson at the center of poetry, but she does not water down the poetic process to achieve this end. She seems to show a belief in the noetic power of poetryandin poetryas food for the soul. Poetrycan onlyfulfillthis role if the tone of the poem is sincere;therefore,she has to presentherselfas the intendedreaderofthe poem-a personof the workingclasses (to whom the poem must speak in their same language)-, and present the theme in a direct, intimate voice. Fuertes obviously believed that poetrycan make a difference in people's lives, and that that difference depends,not so much on the contentof the poem, but on the poet's aesthetic position. She was a single optimist surroundedby pessimists. She shows an awareness,as do her contemporaries,thatpoetryin contemporarysociety is insignificant.7However, unlikeher contemporaries,GloriaFuertes shows us that poetrycan matterby writing Mis primerascuartillas, Escribien la cocina, poetryfor an unusualpoeticaudience-the En la maquinaSinger poor and the very young, forgotten remA los catorceafnos nants of society, too little educatedto mat(Obrasincompletas369) ter, who, however,can turnthings around. She is, as the following poem says, It is to this would-be next generation of "Ramona,"the working class "modistilla" readersthat she addresses her poems: turnedpoet, in whose name all these charNo es todo hacer una poesiaparael pueblo, acteristicsare inclusivein the ludicplayon sino un puebloparala poesia, the sound of the first letter "r":"remera, por eso escriboparael nifio ramera,romera,rimera." y parael adolescente Yo remerade barcas ramerade hombres romerade almas rimerade versos Ramona, pa'servirles (Obrasincompletas75) Fuertes'spoems transformeverydayexperiences into poetic experiences for the working class. They touch upon familiar themes of poetry, such as understanding reality and Man's place in this world, but they also deal with the role andfunctionof poetryandthe poet in contemporarySpain, as did the poetry of others of her generation. Fuertesis by no means an unsophisti- que prontoseranel nuevopueblodecente. (Obrasincompletas107) In this poem, Fuertes speaks clearly of the need for the poet to explainthe meaning of poetry. However, unlike Claudio Rodriguez's"Comoavena,"she avoidspresenting this need as a highly abstract theme. Fuertes uses instead a technique that is frequent in her poems, simultaneouslypresentingthe subjectof the poem in three distinct discourses: testimonial, autobiographicaland poetic. Through the interplayof these three discourses, we arriveatthe meaningof the poem.This clever wayof mixingpublicdiscoursewitha more intimate-almost confessional in her 432 HISPANIA 83 SEPTEMBER2000 Me encuentromas favorecida, case-poetic discourse,makessocialissues me he quitadoel flequillo of as central theme the not the appear y afeitadolos cuernos; poem, but more as a personalindignation, han despenalizadoal adulterio a universalcry for humanjustice devoidof y una no va a ser menos.... didacticismor proselytism.The following (Obrasincompletas109) a transforms shows how Fuertes parpoem The very colloquial language of this ticular economic exploitation, the inadin andthe apparenttrivial,insignificant of Franco's laborers Spain poem equatewages of the fifties, into a universaldenunciation event it describes providea good example of why, for some critics, GloriaFuertes's of a humaninjustice: poetryis not deep or seriousenough. HowMIVECINO ever,this impressioncomes froma limited, literal readingof her poems, that is to say, El albaiil llego de su jornada in the autobiographical discourseas taking Con su jornalenclenquey con sus the of the only poem. Howinterpretation puntos. Bajarona la tiendapor harina, ever, in the re-tellingof this insignificant Hicieronunas gachas con tocino, event in the poem, two additionalinterprePusieronloa enfriaren la ventana, are evident:(1) at the emotionalor tations Lacazuelase cayo al patio. level of the discourse,the poem is in poetic El obrerotosi6: the formof an expletive,andas suchwe can -Como Gloriase entere, esta noche cenamosPoesia. hearthe screamofpainofthe speakerof the (Obrasincompletas116) poem,andsee her eyes fillingwithtears.(2) The poeticpersonaof Gloriain this poem At the testimonial level, we can see her continuesto implicitlycarrythe mythof the pointingher fingerat society,andwe share poet as a working class persona, as the and applaudher disillusionand strong inyoung dressmakeror modistilla.8The title dignation. Gloria Fuertes's originalityrelies preof the poem, "MiVecino,"furtheremphasizes that the poet lives among working- cisely on her innovativepoetic techniques class people and that she not only writes that,as DouglasK.Bensonnotes, stillelude aboutthem but is at the same time one of some readers.Fuerteswas the first peninthem. The modistillapoet's language has sular poet of that generationto use collothe spunkor descarotypicalof these young quial discourse as a poetic device. It is girls, as well as their wisdom, zest for life, through the transformationof these until and playfulresignationto their fate.These now antipoetic devices (colloquialisms, workingclass personalitytraitsalso can be commercials,slang,andeven swearwords) seen in Fuertes'slovepoems,wherewe find into poetic metaphors,that she creates a a mixtureof resignationandinsightintothe new poetic style. Fuertesaims at capturing natureof love. As Debickinoted,they are a the attentionof her audienceby shocking kindof humorouslamentandpainfulcry,as them with the use of such outrageouspoin the short poem "Me encuentro mas etic language,as, forexample,the following favorecida,"where the poet pays a visit to a verses thatexpress her frustrationwiththe beautysalonto boost her self esteem, after process of writinga poem: realizingthat her loverhas been deceiving Escriboestas cosas por la noche. her. In a clever conceit, she not only cuts Haymadrugadas, her bangs, but also shaves her figurative Que no se si levantarmede la mesa parair al lecho hornsas she exposes her foreheadin a new lo irme a la leche! hair style. Committingadultery,she says, (Obrasincompletas116) is nowacceptable,so one shouldgo withthe The speaker of the poem presents hertimes: no need to paradeone's shame,just self as a poet;the poem is aboutGloria,the the hurt: writer,tellingus whatcreatinga poemis all THE HUMANIZATION OF POETRY: AN APPRAISAL OF GLORIA FUERTES 433 about. Unlike Brines's aforementioned philosophicaldescriptionof confrontinga blankpaper,and tryingto wranglea poem out of nothingin Insistenciasen Luzbel,the writerhere presents an ordinaryscene: an exhaustedperson in the earlyhours of the morning, frustrated about her work, her lack of sleep, and her inabilityto write. By constructingthe identityof the poetic persona as a collectionof concrete stories and musings, the poet is no longer the shaman who analyzesandinterpretsthe essence of life for readers,but ratheran ordinaryperson, one of us, who facilitates,ratherthan interprets,ourunderstandingof life. Gloria Fuertestalksto us in a frank,concreteway abouther experiencesandthoughts,which happento also be our own ordinaryexperiences and thoughts, and which, in the retelling, acquire a deeper meaning. She more of helps her readerto "understand" what life is all about, as in the following verses: Si puedes ser, de miel un tarroparael cardo, si puedes convivircon las serpientes, si consigues amnesiavoluntaria, si escoges una celda o mejorcampo, si riegas el silencio de la duda, si amas sin jornalni recompensa, lEstassalvado! (Historiade Gloria246) The significanceof the poemin Fuertes's work is arrivedat by a new form of poetic expression.This new style substitutesthe intellectualdiscourse of the previousgenerationof poets (the so-calledgarcilascistas: Miguel Hernandez, Ridruejo, Panero, Rosales, and Vivanco) with the everyday discourse of the averageperson, and ridicules this previous academic poetic discourse by placingit (implicitlyor explicitly) adjacentto the colloquialdiscourse in her poems. Insertingboth discourses side by side foregroundsthe inadequacyof the academic poetic discourse and enhances the humorous effect so characteristic of her poetry.9Humor is achieved by a form of chiasmus in which one acquires a deeper truthin the second phrase orderthat contradicts the first meaning. Generally,her chiasmus is based on populardichosand antedichos. The reversalsareoftenachieved by changing a single letter in one of the words of the antedicho,ratherthan reversing the wordorder,as is the morecommon use of chiasmusin English (e.g., "Neverbe fooled by a kiss and never be kissed by a fool").The followingis an example of one of her poems built aroundthe dicho:"Los nifiosvienen de Paris."This poem emphasizes the importanceof telling the truthin a direct, straightforwardway (almostantipoetic, in its displacementof the metaphor as a poetic device). Fuertes also stresses here the consequences of speaking the truth:she is expelled from school for saying thatthe storkdoes notbringbabiesinto the world,labordoes. In spite of the consequences, her voice is not that of a meek, victimized, resigned persona exposing a social lie, but ratherthe voice of a self-assuredpoetintroducinga newpoeticstyleby makingfun of the old poetics: AUTOBIO Prontome di cuenta Que era una errataeso De que los niios veniande Paris. A los seis anfoscambiela ese porla erre. Los nifiosvienen de Parir -escribi en la pizarrade las monjas-. Y me echaron. (Historiade Gloria78) The substitutiondevice brings a multiplicityof meaningsintothe poem.Inthe literal sense, this poem is a denunciationof the hypocrisy in contemporarybourgeois Spainand its vehicle of expression:the euphemism.But, in the literarysense, it also is a denunciationof the inadequacyof the metaphoricalandhighly rhetoricalpoetics of the previousgenerationsof poetsto meet the needs of contemporaryreaders. Most of Fuertes's poems are of a dual naturein that they present a simple narration and, at the same time, a literarytopic in a new light. For instance,in the following poem, "Maletilla,"she describes her anti-canonical,popularpoetics by identifying herself as a wanderingpoet-matador. The poet here becomes a trotamundoscarryingher books in a suitcase fromtown to 434 HISPANIA 83 SEPTEMBER2000 town,like a travelingsalesman.This "torero errante,"this social outcast,refuses to talk poetry to (and is shunned by) professors, editors of literarymagazines,and governmentrepresentatives,andonlystopsatbars or tascasto talkto truckdrivers,one source of her inspiration: Maletillade las letras Por los caminosde Espana; sin hacer auto-stopa los catedraticos, ni a los coches oficiales ni a las revistasque pagan.... -solo a los camionerosy a las tascas-; ...y no me dieronninguna oportunidad por ser nieta de putay basta. Ya toreo por mi cuenta, Sin permisosaltovallas, Siete corridasya tengo, toreadas -quiero decir siete libros igual que siete cornadas-, maletillade las letras por los atajosde Espafia. (Obrasincompletas168) Not only do Fuertes'spoems touchupon the familiarthemes of poetry,understanding reality and Man's place in the world; they also deal with the role andfunctionof poetryandthe poet in contemporarySpain. Her poetica places the ordinaryperson at the center of the poetic landscape by humanizingthe poet and deconceptualizing the poem.This is achievedby reversingthe processof creatinga metaphor.A metaphor is a sublimationprocess achieved by (1) creatingan implicitrandomcomparisonor associationbetween two objectsor actions and by (2) removingthe referentialpartof that comparison-the concrete object-, leaving only its correspondingabstractassociation.Fuertes'smetaphorsleaveoutthe abstractpartof the metaphor,so that only the referentialconcrete object appearsin her poems. So, by default, this concrete, antimetaphoricobject is sublimated.This occurs, for example, in the poem where Fuertesintroducesher"Minicursi," self to her readersas their own "modistilla madrilefia"turnedpoet: GloriaFuertes antipoeta teologa-agricola diputadaen cortes de mangas profesoraen partes -comadrejapuericultora archivera hechicerade cartas peritaen dulce -sus laboresdoctoraen bordadosa mano y a maquina corto. campeonade "pentalon" (Obrasincompletas329) Perhaps,as Goytisolosaid in "LaMujer Fuerte,"onlya womanpoetcouldtransform the insignificanceof our everydayspeech into poetic discourse. GloriaFuertes displays a boldness beyond any other poet of her generationto displace poetic conventions,allat once, fromher poems.10It is she who creates a uniquepoetic discoursethat otherpoets dreamof creating.This is quite an achievement.As the outsider,she does not have to discuss the "official"poetics of her generation.As she says,in the prologue to her Obrasincompletas,she could never belong to any movementor school, which is why, for a while, she was "Lauinicaantipostistadentrodel movimientopostista."11 She shares with postismothe search for a new simple,directpoeticdiscourse,devoid of rhetoricandabstractpoetic devices. But unlike her fellow postistas, she not only writesa manifestobutfindsthis new poetic discourseby displacingall the elements of the poetic text-the poet, the text, and the reader-with her ownpopularizedversions of them-the dressmaker,speech, andthe ordinaryperson.Fuertes,by addressingthe poem to the ordinary person instead of otherpoets, providesnew insights into the poeticsof poetry.Poetryis notaboutsearching for a new poetic word, it is about having foundone: DE URGENCIA TELEGRAMAS Escribo,mas que cantarcuentocosas. Destino:Lahumanidad Ingredientes:Muchapena mucharabia algo de sal Forma:Ya nace con ella. Fondo:Que consiga emocionar Misica: Laque el verso toca THE HUMANIZATION OF POETRY: AN APPRAISAL OF GLORIA FUERTES 435 -seguin lo que va a bailarTecnica:iQue aburrimiento! Color:Calornatural Hayque echarlecoraz6n la verdadde la verdad, -la magiade la mentira no es necesarioinventarY asi contarlo que pasa -jnunca silabascontar!Y nace solo el poema.... Y luego la habilidad de poneraquelloen claro si nace sin claridad. (Obrasincompletas29) Fuertes here supplantsthe formatone associates with a poetic text with the formats of a recipe book and a telegram.The telegraphis a metapoeticdevicewith a tonguein-cheekmeaning:GloriaFuerteshas found a new poetic style and needs to spreadthe good news as quickly as possible. All the yearnings and difficultiesinvolved in the search for the poetic are here reduced to song-and-dance ingredients that, when mixed correctly,producea poem. Fuertes'swork,as we haveseen, is a continuousdisplacementof all the elements of poetry.Not onlythe text,butalsothe notion we have of the poem, and of the poet, undergo a majorchange. Gone,with this new conception, is the idea of the self-importance of the authorof the literarytext and the futilityof the critic'ssearch for a clearcut definitionof the nature of a particular poetic style: No me catalogues No me catafalco No me catadifies -seria desfalco(Obrasincompletas33) Unlike her contemporaries,Fuertes is not onlyawarethatthere is an audienceout there that needs andwants to read poetry, but is convincedthat such an audience is the one for whom she is writing: Vengo de abajo Quizapor eso nuncadejarea los del barrio. Tiro haciaarriba, Lapupiladel pobreme tiene viva. Salud,trabajo, Es todo lo que pide el que esta abajo. Le doy cultura, Que aunno sabe leer Con su estatura. Le leo versos, Al hombremis sencillo del universo. (Obrasincompletas79) It is not easy for a writerto find an entirely new audience. It is not easy, with a subjectas highly intellectualas poetryhas become, to convince the masses that it is something they will enjoy reading, something in which they will discover themselves. GloriaFuertes succeeds in wooing her readersby reassuringthem that without them there would not be poems, because they are the subjects of her poems. Andshe engages in a crusadeto spreadthe good news:poetryis not simplyonly about you, as Campoamorsaid, but also for you (157).Fuertes,awareof the lack of interest of general audiences in poetry and the difficultiesinvolvedin publishingwhen one is not only anunknownpoet,but an outcast one, decides to find other means to reach her audience.She hawksher poetry!Inthe finest popular,medievaltradition,she goes to the Rastro,Madrid'sflea market: ELVENDEDORDE PAPELESO ELPOETASIN SUERTE Muybarato, parael nene y la nena, estos cuentos de risa y novelasde pena jaleluyasa diez! Vendoversos, liquidopoesia, -se recibenencargos parabodas,bautizos, peticionesde mano-, iNo se vaya, regalopoesia, llevese este cuarteto que ain no me estrene! Parala madre, parala novia, el mejorregalo junverso de amor! (Obrasincompletas53) n sum,GloriaFuertescreatesa power ful new conceptionof the poetic.This is achievedby makingfun of the intellectualacademicpoetic discourse (notonly of the previous,garcilasista generation, but 436 HISPANIA83 SEPTEMBER 2000 also her own), by emphasizingthe simple ludic aspect of poetry-the sheer fun of playingwith words-and by ridiculingthe exaggeratedself-importantrole that poets have constructedfor themselves. Her goal is to humanizepoetry,to bringit backto the center of our lives. This is achievedby puttingthe emotionsof ordinarypersonsatthe center of her poems and by using their everydaylanguageas the mythicalvehicle of poetic discourse. GloriaFuertesis (in her ownwords)aboveall a trailblazer,a loverof poetry,a literarymissionary,anda folkpoet. NOTES 1InPoetryofDiscovery,Debickiobserveshow this generationof poets departedconsiderablyfrom the poeticstyleof previouspoetsandhowGloriaFuertes's use of colloquialdiscourse and idioms set her apart even fromthe poets of her own generation. 2Sylvia Sherno, who has thoroughly studied Fuertes'spoetictechnique,pointsoutthe importance of textuality,wordplay,and sexualityin her poetry. 3CandelasNewton,in "LaPalabra'convertida'de GloriaFuertes,"offersa semioticanalysisof the poet's feminism. 4InPoetryof Discovery,Debicki shows how these poets move awayfrom sentimentalsocial overstatementsandviewsocietyfromanironic,detachedpoint of view. They preferthe "personal"evocationas the means of discovery. 5FranciscoBrinesdescribesthis processas falling into a world of darkness, a type of Inferno, in his Insistenciasen Luzbel.ClaudioRodriguezsees this process as an exhilaratingexperience in his Don de la ebriedad. 6Thisnoeticpowerof poetryusuallytakesthe form of fairlyabstractintellectualspeculation. 7ManuelVazquezMontalban,in PedroProvencio's Anthology Poetica espanola contempordnea. La generaciondel 70,definesthe roleof poetryin contemporary Spain as insignificant as that of a modesto tirachinasis in today'spotentialnuclearwars (16). 'To become a dressmaker was the typical way younggirls fromthe surroundingvillagescouldearn a livelihood in Madridand escape the drudgeryof countrylife. 9MargaretH. Persin,in Poesiacomoproceso,sees humorin GloriaFuertes'spoetryas a semioticdevice bywhichthe poemsacquirea deepersignificanceand, in so doing,revealto the readera new understanding of reality. '?DouglesK. Benson illustratesGloriaFuertes's complex poetic techniqueof puttingcommon situations in an irrationalcontext. 1Fuerteswas one of the foundingmembersof the literarymagazinePostismo.These poets were search- ing for a more humanisticpoeticsby lookingoutside Spain,to Europeandthe UnitedStates,fornew ideas. * WORKS CITED Benson, DouglasK. "Lavoz inconfundiblede Gloria Fuertes, 1918-1998:poesia temprana."Hispania 83.3 (2000):210-21. Brines,Francisco.Insistenciasen Luzbel.Madrid:Visor, 1977. Browne,Peter E. El amorpor lo (par)odiado:la poesia de GloriaFuertesy Angel Gonzdlez.Madrid: Pliegos, 1997. Campoamor,Ramonde. Antologiapoetica.Madrid: Catedra,1996. Carmell,Pamela. "Interviewwith GloriaFuertes." AmericanPoetryReview20.3 (1991):5-6. Debicki,AndrewP. PoetryofDiscovery.Lexington:UP of Kentucky,1982. Fuertes, Gloria.Historia de Gloria:amor, humory desamor.Madrid:Catedra,1981. -. Obrasincompletas.Madrid:Catedra,1978. Mandlove, Nancy. "The Letter-Poems of Gloria Fuertes." Letras Femeninas 10.1 ([Decimo aniversario]1974-84):33-38. -. "OralTexts":The Play of Oralityand Literacyin the Poetryof GloriaFuertes."SigloXX/20thCentury5 (1987-88):11-16. -. "Used Poetry: The Trans-parentLanguage of GloriaFuertes andAngel Gonzalez."Includedin the section "Metaliteratureand Recent Spanish Literature," by MargaretH. Persinet al.,297-309. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispdnicos 7 (1983):301-06. Newton,Candelas."Lapalabra'convertida'de Gloria Fuertes."LetrasFemeninas13.1-2 (1987):1-11. Persin, MargaretH. Gettingthe Picture.Lewisburg: BucknellUP, 1997. . Poesiacomoproceso:Poesiaespanoladelos50y 60. Trans. Catherine Attele. Madrid:Jose Porrua TuranzasS.A.,1986. Persin, Margaret H., Andrew P. Debicki, Nancy and Mandlove,andRobertSpires."Metaliterature RecentSpanishLiterature." RevistaCanadiensede EstudiosHispdnicos7 (1983):297-309. Provencio,Pedro.Poeticasespaiolascontempordneas: La generaci6ndel 50. Madrid:Hiperi6n,1988. Lageneracion -. Poeticasespanolascontempordneas: del 70. Madrid:Hiperi6n,1988. Rodriguez,Claudio.Poesia 1953-1966. Madrid:Plaza yJanes, 1971. DeathandRenewalin the Sherno,SylviaR. "Carnival: Poetryof GloriaFuertes."MLN104.2(1989):37092. . "GloriaFuertesandthe Poeticsof Solitude."Anales de la LiteraturaEspanola Contempordnea12.3 (1987):311-25. -. 'The Poetryof GloriaFuertes:TextualityandSexu7.1-2 (1989-90):19-23. ality."SigloXX/20thCentury -. "Weaving the World: The Poetry of Gloria Fuertes."Hispania72.2 (1989):247-55.