Quasi-static electromagnetic fields created by an electric dipole in

INVESTIGACIÓN
REVISTA MEXICANA DE FÍSICA 55 (6) 443–449
DICIEMBRE 2009
Quasi-static electromagnetic fields created by an electric dipole
in the vicinity of a dielectric sphere: method of images
Jorge R. Zurita-Sánchez
Instituto Nacional de Astrofı́sica, Óptica y Electrónica,
Apartado Postal 51, Puebla, Pue. 72000, México.
Recibido el 1 de junio de 2009; aceptado el 15 de octubre de 2009
We present a quasi-static description of the electromagnetic fields created by an oscillating electric dipole in the vicinity of a dielectric sphere.
In this description: the fields are generated by image sources, a simple physical picture of the electromagnetic response of the dipole nearby
a dielectric sphere is obtained, and the nearfields are calculated from the Green tensor of a bulk medium. This quasi-static description can be
applied to study radiative properties of emitters (molecules, atoms, etc.) placed in the vicinity of a dielectric spherical nanoparticle.
Keywords: Electric dipole radiation; dielectric sphere.
Se presenta una descripción cuasi-estática de los campos electromagnéticos creados por un dipolo eléctrico que oscila en la cercanı́a de
una esfera dieléctrica. En esta descripción, los campos son generados por fuentes imagen, se obtiene una representación fı́sica simple de
la respuesta electromagnética del dipolo cercano a la esfera dieléctrica y los campos cercanos se obtienen a partir del tensor de Green para
un medio ilimitado. Esta descripción cuasi-estática puede ser aplicada en el estudio de las propiedades radiativas de emisores (moléculas,
átomos, etc.) localizados en la cercanı́a de una nanopartı́cula esférica.
Descriptores: Radiación de un dipolo eléctrico; esfera dieléctrica.
PACS: 03.50.De; 41.20.-q
1.
Introduction
We focus on the electromagnetic fields created by an oscillating electric dipole in the vicinity of a dielectric sphere. Although an exact treatment for the fields created by an electric
dipole placed near a sphere already exists [1], our quasi-static
description will ease the analytical description and provide a
simple physical picture. As might be expected this description approximates well the fields inside the volume λ3 [λ being the wavelength of the radiation] that encloses the dipole
and the sphere. In our quasi-static description, the electromagnetic fields are generated by image sources. Therefore,
the finding of these sources is our central objective. A static
image description for a single charge in presence of a dielectric sphere has been obtained by Lindell [2]. Based on his
methodology, we derive the image sources for the case of an
electric dipole.
The radiative properties of a emitter (molecule, atom,
quantum dot, nano-antenna, etc.) depend on the environment
in which it is embedded. The study of the influence of nearby
nano-objects on these radiative properties is important. For
example, near-field techniques rely precisely on the optical
response of a sample placed in the vicinity of subwavelength
apertures and sharp tips [3, 4], the modification of the lifetime and the fluorescence rate of a molecule in presence of
a nano-particle [1, 5–9]. Our approach can be applied to the
study of certain radiative properties of emitters placed in the
vicinity of nanoscale spheres. The reason is that most of such
emitters have a characteristic wavelength lying in the visible
spectrum which is larger than the length of a nanostructure.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we derive the image charge and current densities arising from the
electric dipole oriented in the radial and tangential directions.
Sec. 3 establishes the expressions to obtain the electric field
created by the image distributions that are found in previous
section. Next, Sec. 4 is devoted to the discussion of the quasistatic picture. Also, this section shows plots of the electric
field generated by a dipole for particular cases. Finally, the
conclusions are presented in Sec. 5.
2.
Image sources
We consider a sphere with radius a and dielectric constant ²a
that is centered at the origin. Outside the sphere, the medium
has a dielectric constant ²b and an electric dipole with moment p is located at rd = zo nz [nz is the unit vector in the
z-direction]. Due to the geometry, the electromagnetic response of an arbitrarily oriented dipole can be reduced as the
superposition of the responses of the dipole for the tangential
(nx ) and radial (nz ) directions [nx is the unit vector in the
x-direction].
2.1.
2.1.1.
Tangential orientation
Outside the sphere
The electrostatic potential outside the sphere created by the
dipole is
Φoutk (r, θ, φ) = Φf (r) + Φk1 (r, θ, φ).
(1)
Here, Φf is the potential created by the dipole in the absence
of sphere,
Φf (r) =
1 p·R
,
4πεo ²b |R|3
(2)
444
J.R. ZURITA-SÁNCHEZ
and Φk1 is the potential arising from the induced charge distribution in the sphere which is explicitly expressed as [10]
α ≡ ²b /(²a + ²b ).
cos φ
4πεo ²b
Φk1 (r, θ, φ) = −p
where α is
It turns out that
∞
X
(²a − ²b )n
a P 1 (cos θ)
bn 2 n n+1 .
×
(²a + ²b )n + ²b zo r
n=1
(3)
gk1 (z) = p
Here, εo is the vacuum permittivity, R = r − rd , (r, θ, φ) are
the spherical coordinates,
−p
2
b ≡ a /zo ,
Pn1
and
is the associated Legendre polynomial of order n
[see Eq. (A.5)]. Our aim is to find an image charge distribution embedded in medium ²b that generates the same potential as in Eq. (3). We assume that the image charge density
has the form
·
¸
d
ρk1 (x, y, z) =
δ(x) δ(y)gk1 (z),
(4)
dx
where δ(. . .) is the Dirac-δ function, and gk1 (z) is the function to be determined. Since the charge density of a point
dipole is proportional to the spatial derivative of a Dirac-δ
function, the charge density ρk1 (x, y, z) [Eq. (4)] can be seen
as a line of dipoles along the z-axis that are oriented in the xdirection. Moreover, the charged line extends from the center
of the sphere to z = a. From these assumptions, the potential
created by ρk1 is
Z
ρ(x0 , y 0 , z 0 )
Φk1 (r, θ, φ) =
dV 0
4πεo ²b |r − r0 |
V0
r sin θ cos φ
=−
4πεo ²b
Za
0
gk1 (z 0 )
dz 0 .
(r2 − 2rz 0 cos θ + z 02 )3/2
(5)
By using the fact that [11]
1
(1 − 2uv + v 2 )3/2
=
∞
X
2.1.2.
·
Za
gk1 (z 0 )
×
0
z0
b
¸n−1
dz 0 .
(7)
By comparing Eqs. (3) and (7), we obtain that gk1 (z) must
fulfill
· 0 ¸n−1
Za
z
a3 ²a − ²b n
,
gk1 (z 0 )
dz 0 = p 3
b
zo ²a + ²b n + α
b
Θ(b − z)
(10)
iωδ(x)δ(y)gk1 (z).
(11)
Now, we turn to the case for the potential inside the sphere
that originated from the presence of the dipole. This potential
is (see Appendix A)
cos φ
4πεo ²a
∞
X
²a (2n + 1)
rn 1
P (cos θ). (12)
(²a + ²b )n + ²b zon+2 n
n=1
Similarly to the previous case, we look for a charge distribution ρk2 now embedded in medium ²a which creates the
same potential as Eq. (12). Also, we consider that the image
charge distribution ρk2 is a line of dipoles which are oriented
in the x-direction, but the charged line extends from z = a
to z → ∞. Thus, ρk2 takes the same form as in Eq. (4), but
gk2 (z) replaces gk1 (z) and the integral runs along the aforementioned line. It follows that the potential created by ρk2
is
Φk2 (r, θ, φ) = −
0
n = 1, 2, . . . ,
b
Inside the sphere
(6)
∞
cos φ X n−1 Pn1 (cos θ)
Φk1 (r, θ, φ) = −
b
4πεo ²b n=1
rn+1
a
We notice that the current density [Eq. (11)] is constituted
by: (1) a single dipole that is located at bnz and is oriented
in the x-direction, and (2) a set of dipoles that are placed in
the line from z = 0 to z = b and oriented in the x-direction
[see Fig. 1].
×
and setting u = cos θ and v = z 0 /r, Eq. (5) becomes
b
zo2 (²a + ²b )2
jk1 (r, ω) =
n−1
|v| < 1,
a3 ²a − ²b
δ(z − b)
zo3 ²a + ²b
a ² (² − ² ) ³ z ´α
satisfies Eq. (8), where Θ(. . .) is the step function. gk1 (z)
given by Eq. (10) is valid for 1 + α > 0.
If the electric dipole oscillates with angular frequency ω
as p = pnx exp(−iωt), then it induces a density current in
the x-direction, that is, jk1 (r, ω) = jk1 (r, ω)nx . By using
the continuity equation [∂jk1 (r, ω)/∂x = iωρk1 (r, ω)] and
Eq. (4), the density current in the quasi-static approximation
becomes
Φk2 (r, θ, φ) = p
v
√
P 1 (u),
2 n
1
−
u
n=1
(9)
(8)
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449
r sin θ cos φ
4πεo ²a
Z∞
×
a
gk2 (z 0 )
dz 0 .
(r2 − 2rz 0 cos θ + z 02 )3/2
(13)
445
QUASI-STATIC ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS CREATED BY AN ELECTRIC DIPOLE IN. . .
2.2.
Radial orientation
2.2.1.
Outside the sphere
Similarly to Eq. (1), the potential outside the sphere for the
radial orientation is
Φout⊥ (r, θ, φ) = Φf (r) + Φ⊥1 (r, θ),
F IGURE 1. (a) An electric dipole p is oriented along the x-axis
and located a distance zo from the center of the sphere with radius
a and dielectric constant ²a . (b) The image distribution (embedded in medium ²b ) for the field outside the sphere is composed of
a dipole and a line of dipoles. (c) The image distribution (embedded in medium ²a ) for the field inside the sphere is composed of a
dipole and a line of dipoles.
By using Eq. (6) with u = cos θ and v = r/z 0 , Eq. (13)
becomes
∞
cos φ X 1
rn
Φk2 (r, θ, φ) = −
Pn (cos θ) n+2
4πεo ²a n=1
zo
Z∞
gk2 (z 0 )
×
h z in+2
a
o
z0
dz 0 .
(14)
(18)
namely, the addition of the potential in absence of the sphere
and the potential created by the induced charge distribution
in the sphere. The latter is [10]
p
Φ⊥1 (r, θ) =
4πεo ²b
×
∞
X
(²a − ²b )n(n + 1) n a Pn (cos θ)
b 2
, (19)
(²a + ²b )n + ²b
zo rn+1
n=0
where Pn (. . .) is the Legendre polynomial of order n. Now,
we assume that the image charge density has the form
ρ⊥1 (x, y, z) = δ(x)δ(y)h⊥1 (z).
(20)
Also, we consider that the charge extends from z = 0 to
z = a. Thus, the potential created by ρ⊥1 is
1
Φ⊥1 (r, θ) =
4πεo ²b
Za
h⊥1 (z 0 )
×
dz 0 .
(21)
(r2 − 2rz 0 cos θ + z 02 )1/2
0
A comparison of Eqs. (12) and (14) shows that gk2 (z) must
fullfill
Z∞
gk2 (z 0 )
a
=−p
h z in+2
o
z0
2²a n+1/2
,
²a +²b n+α
dz 0
n=1, 2, . . .
(15)
Then, it is found that the solution of Eq. (15) is
²a (²a − ²b )
z ³ zo ´α
Θ(z − zo ) 2
.
2
(²a + ²b )
zo z
(16)
Also, gk2 (z) given in Eq. (16) is valid for 1 + α > 0.
As the dipole oscillates with angular frequency ω, the induced current density that is oriented in the x-direction becomes
jk2 (r, ω) = iωδ(x)δ(y)gk2 (z).
∞
X
1
=
v n Pn (u),
(1 − 2uv + v 2 )1/2
n=0
|v| < 1,
(22)
with u = cos θ and v = z 0 /r, Eq. (21) can be expressed as
1
Φ⊥1 (r, θ) =
4πεo ²b
· 0 ¸n
Za
∞
X
z
n Pn (cos θ)
0
×
b
h⊥1 (z )
dz 0 . (23)
n+1
r
b
n=0
0
2²a
gk2 (z) = −p
δ(z − zo )
²a + ²b
−p
By the fact that
(17)
As can be seen, the current density [Eq. (17)] arises from: (1)
a single dipole that is located at zo nz , and (2) a set of dipoles
that are placed at the line from z = zo to z → ∞. All of
them are oriented in the x-direction [see Fig. 1c].
By comparing Eqs. (19) and (23), h⊥1 (z) must fulfill
· 0 ¸n
Za
z
h⊥1 (z 0 )
dz 0
b
0
a ²a − ²b n(n + 1)
,
n = 0, 1, 2, . . .
zo2 ²a + ²b n + α
It follows that Eq. (24) is satisfied if
d
g⊥1 (z),
h⊥1 (z) =
dz
=p
a3 ²a − ²b
r1 (z)δ(z − b)
zo3 ²a + ²b
a ²a (²a − ²b ) ³ z ´α
Θ(b − z),
−p 2
zo (²a + ²b )2 b
(24)
(25)
g⊥1 (z) ≡ −p
r1 (z) = (z/b)α+1 .
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449
(26)
(27)
446
J.R. ZURITA-SÁNCHEZ
Again, by comparing Eqs. (29) and (30), we obtain that
h⊥2 (z) must fulfill
Z∞
h⊥2 (z 0 )
h z in+1
o
z0
a
×
dz 0 = −
p 2²a
zo ²a + ²b
(n + 1/2)(n + 1)
,
n+α
n = 0, 1, 2, . . .
(31)
We found that the solution of Eq. (31) takes the form:
d
g⊥2 (z),
dz
2²a
g⊥2 (z) = −p
r2 (z)δ(z − zo )
²a + ²b
²a (²a − ²b ) z ³ zo ´α
−p
Θ(z − zo ),
(²a + ²b )2 zo2 z
³ z ´α−2
o
r2 =
.
z
F IGURE 2. (a) An electric dipole p is oriented along the z-axis and
located at a distance zo from the center of the sphere having radius
a and dielectric constant ²a . (b) The image distribution (embedded in medium ²b ) for the field outside the sphere is composed of a
dipole and a charged line. (c) The image distribution (embedded in
medium ²a ) for the field inside the sphere is composed of a dipole
and a charged line.
The above solution h⊥1 (z) [Eq. (25)] is valid for α > 0.
The induced image density current by the oscillating
dipole is oriented in the z-direction [j⊥i (r, ω)nz ]. This density current in the quasi-static approximation is
j⊥1 (r, ω) = iωδ(x)δ(y)g⊥1 (z).
h⊥2 (z) =
j⊥2 (r, ω) = iωδ(x)δ(y)g⊥2 (z).
The static potential inside the sphere is (see Appendix A)
Φ⊥2 (r, θ) = −
×
p
4πεo ²a
∞
X
²a (2n + 1)(n + 1) rn
Pn (cos θ). (29)
(²a + ²b )n + ²b zon+2
n=0
We assume the same form for the image charge distribution
as in Eq. (20), but the charge is located outside the sphere
and h⊥2 replaces h⊥1 . The potential created is obtained as in
Eq. (21) with h⊥1 replaced by h⊥2 and the integration goes
from z = a to z → ∞. Then, by using Eq. (22) with the
substitution u = cos θ and v = r/z 0 , the potential produced
by the image charge distribution turns out to be
Φ⊥2 (r, θ) =
1
4πεo ²a
∞
X
Pn (cos θ)
n=0
Z∞
zo h⊥2 (z 0 )
×
a
h z in+1
o
z0
rn
zon+2
dz 0 .
(30)
(34)
(35)
The image charge density is constituted by: (1) an image
dipole that is located at z = zo , and (2) a line [from z = zo
to z → ∞] of dipoles that are oriented in the z-direction.
This is depicted in Fig. 1c.
3.
2.2.2. Inside the sphere
(33)
Also, h⊥2 (z) is defined for α > 0.
As the dipole oscillates, it induces the density current distribution, along the z-direction, given by
(28)
As seen from Eqs. (28) and (26) the image distribution is: a
point dipole that is located at z = b, and (2) a line of dipoles
extending from z = 0 to z = b. Both distributions being
oriented in the z-direction.
(32)
Electric Field
If a current j(r, ω) is embedded in a nonmagnetic medium
then the electric field produced by this current is given by
Z
←
→
E(r, ω) = iµo ω
G (r, r0 , ω)j(r0 , ω)d3 r0 .
(36)
←
→
Here, µo is the vacuum permeability and G (r, r0 , ω) is the
Green tensor that characterizes the electromagnetic response
of an electric dipole embedded in an arbitrary environment.
The electric field created by the dipole in the vicinity of
the sphere in the quasi-static approximation is
Eβi (r, ω) = Eβo (r, ω)δ1i + Escaβi (r, ω),
(37)
where β =k, ⊥, i = 1 (outside), 2 (inside), and δ is the Kronecker tensor. Eβo (r, ω) is the electric field created by the
dipole in the absence of the sphere which is
Eβo (r, ω) =
→
ko2 ←
G 1 (r, zo nz , ω) pnβ ,
εo
(38)
and Escaβi (r, ω) is the electric field created by the image currents jβi nβ defined as
Z
←
→
ko2
Escaβi (r, ω) = −
G i (r, z 0 nz , ω)nβ gβi (z 0 )dz 0 .
εo
(39)
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449
QUASI-STATIC ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS CREATED BY AN ELECTRIC DIPOLE IN. . .
Here, nk(⊥) ≡ nx(z) , ko ≡ ω 2 /c2 [c is the velocity of light
←
→
in a vacuum], and G 1(2) is the Green’s tensor for an unbounded, isotropic and nonmagnetic medium with dielectric
constant ²b (²a ). The explicit expression of this tensor is encountered in Appendix B.
4.
Discussion of the quasi-static description
Independently of the dipole orientation, the electric field (inside or outside) arises from a point dipole and a line-current
distribution. The electric field created by the point dipole resembles the quasi-static field created for a dipole in the vicinity of a planar interface. For the case of the field outside
the sphere, the solution differs by a geometric weight factor
(a3 /zo3 ) and the location of the image dipole.
If the radius a is large (a → ∞), then we could expect
that the image solution for the planar interface must be recovered. This is indeed the case. Straightforwardly, the image line contributions vanish. For the image point dipole that
creates the field outside the sphere, by defining zo ≡ a + ∆s,
the geometric factor a3 /zo3 → 1 and b → a − ∆s, namely the
dipole and its image are equidistant from the interface. As a
consequence, the image sources are the same as those for a
planar interface in this limit a → ∞.
As seen in the previous section, the Green tensor has
retardation. Therefore, our solution fulfills the dynamic
Maxwell equations. However, the boundary conditions of the
electromagnetic at the surface of the sphere are not exactly
matched, since our solution comes from a static assumption.
Nevertheless, the electromagnetic fields should be well approximated by using quasi-static approach in the vicinity of
a small sphere (a ¿ λ).
We can consider a dielectric sphere with absorption
(Im[α] > 0), but the validity of the method is assured if
Re[α] + 1 > 0 (Re[α] > 0) for the tangential (radial) orientation.
Finally, merely as an illustration of our quasi-static
method, we plot the electric field intensity |E(r, ω)|2 generated by the dipole in the presence of a dielectric sphere
for particular cases. We consider a sphere with radius a =
30 nm, and a dipole located at zo = 75 nm and oscillating
with a frequency ω corresponding to the free-space wavelength λo = 477 nm. We treat the cases for the sphere made
of glass (²gl = 2.25), silicon (²si = 19.72 + 0.8i), and gold
(²au = −1.7 + 4.46i). The spheres are embedded in a vacuum (²b = 1) with the exception of the gold sphere which is
embedded in glass. In Fig. 3, we show the contour curves
of the electric field intensity |E(r, ω)|2 at the xz-plane for a
dipole oriented in the radial direction and spheres made of
glass, silicon, and gold. We note that the intensity contour
curves suffer a small distortion from the presence of the glass
sphere, whereas these curves are strongly distorted for the
silicon and gold spheres. This is due to the fact that the scattered field by the silicon and gold particles is greater than by
the glass sphere. As seen in Figs. 3b and 3c for the silicon
447
and gold particles, the scattered field is concentrated at the
left and right edges of the sphere. Since gold absorbs more
energy than silicon and glass at λo , the gradient of the intensity |E(r, ω)|2 inside the gold sphere is larger than in the
other cases. Last, we consider the case of the dipole oriented
tangentially. The contour curves of the electric field intensity |E(r, ω)|2 at the xz-plane for this orientation are plotted
in Fig. 4. Similarly to the dipole oriented radially, the distortion of intensity contour lines is more noticeable for the
silicon and gold sphere than for the glass sphere. The intensity |E(r, ω)|2 inside the sphere for the glass and silicon
particles is almost homogeneous, while the opposite happens
for the gold sphere (see Fig. 4). The scattered field near the
sphere is concentratted predominantly on the right hand side
of the sphere. Indeed, interference between the field coming directly from the dipole and the scattered electric field is
appreciable in this region.
F IGURE 3. Contour curves of log |E(r, ω)|2 at the xz-plane for
a dipole oriented in the radial direction, zo = 75 nm, a = 30 nm,
and λo = 477 nm. Each plot covers an area λo /2 × λo /2. The
color scale maps the same intensity in the plots. (a) Glass sphere
(dielectric) embedded in vacuum (²b = 1). (b) Silicon sphere
(semiconductor) embedded in vacuum (²b = 1). (c) Gold sphere
(metal) embedded in glass ²b = 2.25.
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449
448
J.R. ZURITA-SÁNCHEZ
This method can be applied to study the electromagnetic
response of emitters near a dielectric nano-sphere.
Appendix
A. Potential inside sphere
Herein, we derive the potential in Φβ,2 (β =⊥, k) from the
potential created by a single charge q placed outside the
sphere at zo nz which is given by [12]
q
4πεo
φin (r, θ) =
∞
X
rn
2n + 1
Pn (cos θ).
(²a + ²b )n + ²b zon+1
n=0
×
(A.1)
The potential inside the sphere can be obtained from
Eq. (A.1) as:
Φ⊥2 (r, θ) =
Φk2 (r, θ, φ) =
p ∂
φin (r, θ),
q ∂zo
¯
¯
p ∂
φin (r, ξ) ¯¯
,
qzo ∂θo
θo =0
(A.2)
(A.3)
where
cos ξ = cos θ cos θo + sin θ sin θo cos φ.
(A.4)
To obtain the final expression for Φk2 , we use the fact that
F IGURE 4. Contour curves of log |E(r, ω)|2 at the xz-plane
for a dipole oriented in the tangential direction, zo = 75 nm,
a = 30 nm, and λo = 477 nm. Each plot covers an area
λo /2 × λo /2. The color scale maps the same intensity for the
plots. (a) Glass sphere (dielectric) embedded in vacuum (²b = 1).
(b) Silicon sphere (semiconductor) embedded in vacuum (²b = 1).
(c) Gold sphere (metal) embedded in glass ²b = 2.25.
Pn1 (y) = (1 − y 2 )1/2
d
Pn (y).
dy
B. Green tensor for a bulk medium
The Green tensor in a bulk material with dielectric constant
²(ω) can be expressed as
←
→
←
→
G (r, r0 , ω) = G nf (r, r0 , ω)
←
→
←
→
+ G if (r, r0 , ω) + G ff (r, r0 , ω),
5. Conclusions
We presented a quasi-static description in which the electromagnetic fields that are created by an oscillating dipole arise
from image sources. We derived the expressions of the image
sources for the principal orientations (tangential and radial).
We found that the current image source for these orientations
is constituted by a point dipole and a line current. A simple
physical picture for the response of the electric dipole in the
vicinity of the sphere was obtained. The quasi-static electromagnetic fields produced by the dipole are obtained from
the Green tensor for a bulk material. The contribution of the
field arising from the line current is obtained by performing
a single quadrature integral. To illustrate our method, we obtained plots of the electric field created by an electric dipole
for particular cases.
(A.5)
(B.1)
←
→
←
→
←
→
where G nf (r, r0 , ω), G if (r, r0 , ω), and G ff (r, r0 , ω) are the
nearfield, intermediate-field, and farfield contributions, respectively. These partial contributions are defined as
i
←
→
→
eikR 1 h ←
G nf (r, r0 , ω) =
− I + 3nR nR , (B.2a)
2
2
4πR k R
i
←
→
→
eikR −i h ←
G if (r, r0 , ω) =
− I + 3nR nR ,
(B.2b)
4πR kR
i
←
→
→
eikR h←
G ff (r, r0 , ω) =
I − nR nR .
(B.2c)
4πR
p
Here, k = ω ²(ω)/c, R = |r − r0 |, nR = (r − r0 )/R, and
←
→
I is the unit dyadic.
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449
QUASI-STATIC ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS CREATED BY AN ELECTRIC DIPOLE IN. . .
1. H. Chew, J. Chem. Phys. 87 (1987) 1355.
449
8. F. Cannone, G. Chirico, A.R. Bizzarri, and S. Cannistraro, J.
Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 16491.
2. I.V. Lindell, Am. J. Phys. 61 (1993) 39.
3. E. Betzig and R.J. Chichester, Science 262 (1993) 1422.
4. E.J. Sánchez, L. Novotny, and X.S. Xie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82
(1999) 4014.
5. J. Gersten and A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 75 (1981) 1139.
9. S. Kühn, U. Håkanson, L. Rogobete, and V. Sandoghdar, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 017402.
10. G.W. Ford and W.H. Weber, Phys. Rep. 113 (1984) 195.
6. R. Ruppin, J. Chem. Phys. 76 (1982) 1681.
11. G.B. Arfken and H.J. Weber, Mathematical Methods for Physicists, ed. 5th (Academic Press, San Diego, 2001),
7. P. Anger P. Bharadwaj and L. Novotny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96
(2006) 113002.
12. J.A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1941).
Rev. Mex. Fı́s. 55 (6) (2009) 443–449