Established

European Research Council
Established by the European Commission
Palma de Mallorca,
16 October 2014
Jose Labastida
Head of the ERC Scientific Department
Contents
Established by the European Commission
• ERC basics
• ERC 2014 Work Program
• Spain at ERC
│2
Established by the European Commission
ERC basics
│3
ERC basics
What is ERC?
Established by the European Commission
 An independent funding body set up by the EU in 2007 and led by
scientists
 Funding excellent researchers of any nationality, to carry out frontier
research in Europe, via annual competitions
 Scientific excellence is the sole criterion on the basis of which ERC
frontier research grants are awarded
 Application can be made in any field of research
 Independent researchers of any age and any career stage can apply
 Substantial (and portable) easily handled grants
 International, top level peer-review
│4
ERC basics
ERC in the H2020 Structure
Established by the European Commission
 The HORIZON 2020 main components:

Excellent Science
 World class science is foundation of technologies, jobs, well-being
 Europe needs to develop, attract, retain research talent
 Researchers need access to the best infrastructures


Industrial leadership
Societal challenges
 Excellent Science:

European Research Council

Future and Emerging Technologies

Marie Sklodoswka-Curie Actions

Research Infrastructures
│5
ERC basics
Horizon 2020 Budget € 77 billion
ERC Budget € 13 billion
Established by the European Commission
FP7
H2020
│6
ERC basics
ERC structure
Established by the European Commission
The European Commission
•
•
•
•
Provides financing through the EU framework programmes
Guarantees autonomy of the ERC
Assures the integrity and accountability of the ERC
Adopts annual work programmes as established by
the Scientific Council
The ERC Scientific Council
•
22 prominent researchers proposed by an independent
identification committee
•
•
Appointed by the Commission (4 years, renewable once)
Establishes overall scientific strategy; annual work programmes
(incl. calls for proposals, evaluation criteria); peer review methodology;
selection and accreditation of experts
•
•
Controls quality of operations and management
Ensures communication with the scientific community
The ERC Executive Agency
•
•
•
•
•
•
Executes annual work programme as established by the Scientific Council
Implements calls for proposals and provides information and support to applicants
Organises peer review evaluation
Establishes and manages grant agreements
Administers scientific and financial aspects and follow-up of grant agreements
Carries out communications activities and ensures information dissemination to
ERC stakeholders
ERC basics
ERC Scientific Council Members
Established by the European Commission
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Prof. Klaus BOCK (Chemistry)
Prof. Jean-Pierre BOURGUIGNON (Mathematics), ERC President
Prof. Nicholas CANNY (History)
Prof. Sierd A.P.L. CLOETINGH (Earth Sciences)
Prof. Tomasz DIETL (Physics)
Prof. Daniel DOLEV (Computer Sciences)
Prof. Athene DONALD (Biological Physics)
Dr. Barbara ENSOLI (Medicine)
Prof. Pavel EXNER (Applied Mathematics & Mathematical Physics)
Prof. Reinhard GENZEL (Astrophysics)
Prof. Carl-Henrik HELDIN (Molecular Cell Biology)
Prof. Timothy HUNT (Biology)
Prof. Matthias KLEINER (Engineering)
Prof. Eva KONDOROSI (Biology)
Prof. Mart SAARMA (Biology)
Prof. Nuria SEBASTIAN GALLES (Psychology)
Prof. Nils Christian STENSETH (Ecology & Evolution)
Prof. Martin STOKHOF (Philosophy)
Prof. Anna TRAMONTANO (Biochemistry)
Prof. Isabelle VERNOS (Molecular and Cell Biology)
Prof. Reinhilde VEUGELERS (Economics)
Prof. Michel WIEVIORKA (Sociology)
ERC basics
After 7 years of existence…
Established by the European Commission
 Highly recognised by the research community
 4 400 top researchers funded (65% are at an early-career stage); 64
nationalities represented
 Highly competitive (average success rate 12%)
 Working in 600 different institutions in 29 countries
 50% of grantees in 50 institutions : “Excellence attracts excellence”
 Benchmarking effect: impact on national programmes and agencies;
national funding for best "runners-up"
 Efficient and fast grant management
│9
ERC basics
Funding schemes
Established by the European Commission
Starting Grants
Consolidator Grants
starters
(2-7 years after PhD)
up to € 2.0 Mio
for 5 years
consolidators
(7-12 years after PhD)
up to € 2.75 Mio
for 5 years
Synergy Grants
2 – 4 Principal Investigators
up to € 15.0 Mio for 6 years
Advanced Grants track-record of
significant research
achievements in
the last 10 years
up to € 3.5 Mio
for 5 years
Proof‐of‐Concept bridging gap between research - earliest
stage of marketable innovation
up to €150,000 for ERC grant holders
│ 10
ERC basics
Established by the European Commission
Data as of 21/8/2014 │ 11
ERC basics
ERC grant distribution to countries of HI
StG, CoG and AdG 2007-2013
Established by the European Commission
*) Host institution refers to the organisation with which the first grant agreement was signed│ 12
ERC basics
ERC grant distribution per nationalities
StG, CoG and AdG 2007-2013
Established by the European Commission
│ 13
ERC basics
Mobility of researchers
StG, CoG and AdG 2007-2013
Established by the European Commission
Current host institutions; data as of 16/12/2013│ 14
ERC basics
Distribution of ERC Grants vs. R&D Expenditure
by Country of HI (ERC StG, CoG and AdG calls 2007-2013)
Established by the European Commission
│ 15
Country
Higher-Education Institution
No
StG/CoG
AdG
Total
LS
PE
SH
UK University of Oxford
1
63
58
121
36
52
33
UK University of Cambridge
2
69
49
118
40
57
21
UK University College London
3
56
30
86
35
18
33
CH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich)
4
35
46
81
25
53
3
CH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
5
44
36
80
23
55
2
IL Weizmann Institute
6
51
28
79
45
33
1
IL Hebrew University of Jerusalem
7
43
30
73
33
26
14
UK Imperial College
8
34
27
61
23
38
UK University of Edinburgh
9
24
21
45
10
21
14
BE University of Leuven
9
30
15
45
12
23
10
UK University of Bristol
10
18
21
39
8
25
6
DE University of Munich (LMU)
11
14
24
38
16
16
6
NL Radboud University Nijmegen
12
25
12
37
14
11
12
NL University of Amsterdam
12
20
17
37
3
10
24
NL Leiden University
13
20
15
35
1
16
18
NL Utrecht University
14
20
13
33
8
17
8
14
25
8
33
9
23
1
CH University of Zurich
14
18
15
33
21
5
7
UK King's College London
15
22
9
31
12
5
14
IL Tel Aviv University
15
17
14
31
11
17
3
CH University of Geneva
15
14
17
31
19
9
3
FI University of Helsinki
16
16
14
30
21
7
2
16
18
12
30
28
No
StG
AdG
Total
LS
PE
SH
FR National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)
1
142
66
208
58
119
31
DE Max Planck Society
2
67
45
112
60
45
7
FR National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm)
3
39
18
57
54
1
2
FR French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission
4
34
9
43
7
35
1
ES Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)
5
25
15
40
15
20
5
FR National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automatic Control (INRIA)
6
19
12
31
Established by the European Commission
IL Technion - Israel Institute of Technology
SE Karolinska Institute
Country
Top
European
Institutions
hosting
at least 30
ERC
Grantees
by funding
Schemes
Research Organisation
2
31
StG/CoG 2007-2013
AdG 2008-2013
First legal
signatories
of the grant
agreement
Data as of 16/12/2013
ERC basics
Publication from ERC funded projects
Established by the European Commission
Already over 20.000 papers acknowledging ERC support
published in international, peer reviewed* Thomson
journals.
Reuters, WoS, End of 2012
│ 17
ERC basics
Developing a new generation of excellent scientists
2/3 of staff are people in the training phase of their career
Analysis of 995 ERC projects
Established by the European Commission
│ 18
│ 18
Established by the European Commission
ERC 2015 Work Program
│ 19
ERC 2015 Work Program
Summary of main features
Established by the European Commission
 Three ERC frontier research grants will be available under Work Programme
2015: Starting; Consolidator; and Advanced Grants
 ERC Principal Investigators will also continue to be able to apply for the Proof of
Concept Grant, first introduced in 2011
 Overhead: 25%
 Restrictions on applications will apply to the 2016/17 calls based on the outcome
of the evaluation of the 2015 calls
 Publication in open access mandatory
 Applicants can opt-in in the H2020 pilot on open research data
 Reference date for eligibility windows in StG and CoG: January 1, 2015
 Budget is not pre-fixed by scientific domain
 Update of panel titles, subtitles and descriptors
 40% minimum commitment for CoG
│ 20
ERC 2015 Work Program
ERC funding schemes
Established by the European Commission
Starting Grants
Consolidator Grants
starters
(2-7 years after PhD)
up to € 2.0 Mio
for 5 years
consolidators
(7-12 years after PhD)
up to € 2.75 Mio
for 5 years
Advanced Grants track-record of
significant research
achievements in the
last 10 years
up to € 3.5 Mio
for 5 years
Proof‐of‐Concept bridging gap between research - earliest
stage of marketable innovation
up to €150,000 for ERC grant holders
│ 21
ERC 2015 Work Program
ERC funding schemes
Established by the European Commission
Starting Grant (StG): nurturing the next generation research leaders.
To support excellent Principal Investigators at the career stage at which they are starting
their own independent research team or programme.
Consolidator Grant (CoG): consolidating the next generation research leaders.
To support excellent Principal Investigators at the career stage at which they may still be
consolidating their own independent research team or programme.
Advanced Grant (AdG): attracting and rewarding established independent research
leaders.
To support excellent Principal Investigators at the career stage at which they are already
established research leaders with a recognised track record of research achievements.
Applicant Principal Investigators must demonstrate
the ground breaking nature, ambition and feasibility
of their scientific proposal.
│ 22
ERC 2015 Work Program
Principal investigator profile and commitment for StG
Established by the European Commission
PI Profile:
 Any current place of work but working or moving to work in Europe
(EU member state or FP7 Associated Country)
 Any nationality or age
 Over 2 and up to 7 years of experience after PhD
 Potential for independence and evidence of maturity
 Good track-record of early research achievements, appropriate to
their research field and career stage
PI Commitment:
 Minimum 50% of PI working time on ERC project
 Minimum 50% of PI working time in a EU Member Sate or Associated
Country
│ 23
ERC 2015 Work Program
Principal investigator profile and commitment for CoG
Established by the European Commission
PI Profile:
 Any current place of work but working or moving to work in
Europe (EU member state or FP7 Associated Country)
 Any nationality or age
 Over 7 and up to 12 years of experience after PhD
 Independence and evidence of maturity shown
 Promising track-record of early research achievements,
appropriate to their research field and career stage
PI Commitment:
 Minimum 40% of PI working time on ERC project
 Minimum 50% of PI working time in a EU Member Sate or Associated
Country
│ 24
ERC 2015 Work Program
Principal investigator profile and commitment for AdG
Established by the European Commission
PI Profile:
 Any current place of work but working or moving to work in
Europe (EU member state, FP7 Associated Country)
 Any nationality or age
 Strong leadership profile (impact, recognition,…)
 Excellent track record in recent years (achievements during
the last 10 years)
PI Commitment:
 Minimum 30% of PI working time on ERC project
 Minimum 50% of PI working time in a EU Member Sate or Associated
Country
│ 25
ERC 2015 Work Program
Funding
Established by the European Commission
Starting Grant (StG):
Up to 1.5 million € for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter
duration). Up to 0.5 million € additional
Consolidator Grant (CoG):
Up to 2.0 million € for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter
duration). Up to 0.75 million € additional
Advanced Grant (AdG):
Up to 2.5 million € for a period of 5 years (pro rata for projects of shorter
duration). Up to 1.0 million € additional
additional
to cover (a) eligible "start-up" costs for Principal Investigators moving
from a another country to the EU or an Associated Country as a
consequence of receiving the ERC grant and/or (b) the purchase of
major equipment and/or (c) access to large facilities.
│ 26
ERC 2015 Work Program
Evaluation of proposals: panel structure
Established by the European Commission
Social Sciences and Humanities
Life Sciences









LS1 Molecular & structural biology &
biochemistry
LS2 Genetics, genomics, bioinformatics &
systems biology
LS3 Cellular and developmental biology
LS4 Physiology, pathophysiology &
endocrinology
LS5 Neurosciences & neural disorders
LS6 Immunity & infection
LS7 Diagnostic tools, therapies & public health
LS8 Evolutionary, population & environmental
biology
LS9 Applied life sciences & biotechnology






SH1 Individuals, institutions & markets
SH2 The social world, diversity, institutions and values
SH3 Environment, space and population
SH4 The human mind and its complexity
SH5 Cultures & cultural production
SH6 The study of the human past
Physical Sciences & Engineering










PE1 Mathematics
PE2 Fundamental constituents of matter
PE3 Condensed matter physics
PE4 Physical & analytical chemical sciences
PE5 Materials & synthesis
PE6 Computer science & informatics
PE7 Systems & communication engineering
PE8 Products & process engineering
PE9 Universe sciences
PE10 Earth system science
│ 27
ERC 2015 Work Program
Proposal structure
Established by the European Commission
PART A – online forms
PART B1 – submitted as .pdf
Info on Proposal, PI, HI and
overall budget
•
•
•
Annexes – submitted as .pdf
•
•
Statement of support of HI
If applicable: explanatory
information on ethical issues;
copy of PhD (StG, CoG);
document for extension of
eligibility window (StG, CoG)
Extended Synopsis
CV
Track Record
5 p.
2 p.
2 p.
Funding ID beyond the 2 page limit for the CV
Explanatory comment if interdisciplinary
Optional template for the CV
PART B2 – submitted as .pdf
•
Scientific Proposal
15 p.
Template for the budget
Read the Information to Applicants
│ 28
ERC 2015 Work Program
Role of the host institution
Established by the European Commission
•
Is located in an EU Member State or an Associated Country
•
Hosts the PI for the duration of the project
•
Is a legal entity: university, research center, business research
unit, etc.
•
Is committed to ensure that the PI may:
o
Apply for funding independently
o
Manage research and funding project
o
Publish independently as senior author
o
Have access to reasonable space and facilities
•
Signs Grant Agreement
•
Overhead: 25%
│ 29
ERC 2015 Work Program
Features of ERC grants
Established by the European Commission
•
No constraints on eligible costs as long as they are for the
execution of the project
•
Rules of the HI apply
•
High flexibility: aims of the project can be modified through
amendments to the grant agreement
•
Grants have a light reporting along the project life-time: financial
report every 18 months, scientific report at mid-term and end of
the project
•
Grants have 25-40% pre-financing
•
PI is empowered to manage the research activity and the funds
of the project
•
Grants are portable
│ 30
ERC 2015 Work Program
Evaluation of proposals: main features
Established by the European Commission
Goal of the evaluation: select the best frontier research proposals
Only evaluation criteria: excellence
Method: peer review
Structure: 25 panels distributed in 3 scientific domains (10 Physical
Sciences, 9 Life sciences and 6 Social Sciences and Humanities)
 Each panel consists of 1 panel chair and 12-16 panel members




What makes
ERC evaluation
exceptional?
Peers
Review procedure
│ 31
ERC 2015 Work Program
Evaluation of proposals: peers
Established by the European Commission
 Panel members: typically 375 / call



High-level scientists
Recruited by ScC from all over the
world: ~14% from outside Europe
About 12-16 members plus a chair
person
 Referees: typically 2000 / call


Evaluate only a small number of
proposals
Similar to normal practise in peerreviewed journals
US
(7%)
Other
(7%)
EU and
Associated
Countries
(86%)
│ 32
ERC 2015 Work Program
Evaluation of proposals: review procedure
Established by the European Commission
STEP 1
STEP 2
Remote assessment by Panel members
of section 1 – PI and synopsis
Remote assessment by Panel members
and reviewers of full proposals
Panel meeting
Panel meeting + interview (StG and CoG)
Proposals retained
for step 2
Ranked list of
proposals
Feedback to
applicants
•
•
•
Right balance between generalist + specialized review
Appropriate treatment of interdisciplinary proposals
Good cost-benefit ratio
│ 33
ERC 2015 Work Program
Excellence is the sole evaluation criterion
Established by the European Commission
Evaluation of excellence at two levels:
• Excellence of the Research Project
 Ground breaking nature
 Potential impact
 Scientific Approach
• Excellence of the Principal Investigator
 Intellectual capacity
 Creativity
 Commitment
│ 34
ERC 2015 Work Program
Ranking and scoring: Step 1
Established by the European Commission

In Step 1 proposals are ranked by the panels on the basis of the
marks they have received and the panels' overall appreciation of their
strengths and weaknesses.

Proposals will be retained for Step 2 based on the ranked list and the
determined budgetary cut-off level.

Applicants will be informed on the score attained by their proposal:
o
o
o

A: is of sufficient quality to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation,.
B: is of high quality but not sufficient to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation.
C: is not of sufficient quality to pass to Step 2 of the evaluation.
In addition, applicants will be told the ranking range of their proposal
out of the proposals evaluated by the panel.
│ 35
ERC 2015 Work Program
Step 1 feedback to applicants
Established by the European Commission
•
“A” proposal receive no evaluation report and PI is informed that the
•
“B” proposal will receive Individual Assessment Reports and Panel
Comment Report plus 10% ranking slices starting from the cut-off
point between A and B
proposal has passed to Step 2 and in the case of StG and CoG is invited
to the interview

•
“C” proposal will receive Individual Assessment Reports and Panel
Comment Report plus simply the top and the bottom percentage
positions (applicant will be subject to resubmission limitations)

•
e.g. ranking range 33% - 42%
e.g. from 68% to 100%
Applicants will receive in addition a cover letter informing them of
the cut-off point to pass to Step 2 (in percentage) for the panel

e.g. only 33% best proposals were able to pass to Step 2
│ 36
ERC 2015 Work Program
Ranking and scoring: Step 2
Established by the European Commission

In step 2 proposals are ranked by the panels on the basis of the
marks they have received and an overall appreciation of their
strengths and weaknesses.

Proposals will be recommended for funding based on the ranked list
and the funds available.

Applicants will be informed on the score attained by their proposal:
o
o

A: fully meets the ERC's excellence criterion and is recommended for
funding if sufficient funds are available.
B: meets some but not all elements of the ERC's excellence criterion and
will not be funded.
In addition, applicants will be told the ranking range of their proposal
out of the proposals evaluated by the panel.
│ 37
ERC 2015 Work Program
Step 2 feedback to applicants
Established by the European Commission
•
“A” proposals within panel budget at meeting (funding for sure) will
receive Individual Assessment Reports, Remote Referee Reports
and Panel Comment Report plus the percentage of group

•
“A” proposal outside panel budget at meeting (i.e. not funded for
sure) will receive Individual Assessment Reports, Remote Referee
Reports and Panel Comment Report plus its individual ranking
position with a 2% ranking range

•
e.g. 52 - 54%
“B” proposal will receive Individual Assessment Reports, Remote
Referee Reports and Panel Comment Report plus the top and
bottom of group

•
e.g. top 45%
e.g. between 58% and 100%
Applicants will receive in addition a cover letter informing them of the
cut-off point for funding (in percentage) at meeting

e.g. only 45% best proposals were funded with the funds available at
│ 38
the time of the panel meeting
ERC 2015 Work Program
2015 Resubmission restrictions
Established by the European Commission
Resubmission rules for 2015 applicants:
•
Those who receive B (Step 1 or Step 2) have to wait out
one year to apply again
•
Those who receive a C will have to wait out two years
to apply again
│ 39
ERC 2015 Work Program
ERC Call Calendar
Established by the European Commission
ERC calls
Budget
Call Opening
Submission
Deadline(s)
Starting Grants
430 M€
7 October 2014
3 February 2015
585 M€
13 November
2014
12 March 2015
630 M€
10 February 2015
2 June 2015
7 November 2014
DL1: 5 February 2015
DL2: 28 May 2015
DL3: 1 October 2015
ERC-2015-StG
Consolidator
Grants
ERC-2015-CoG
Advanced Grants
ERC-2015-AdG
Proof of Concept
ERC-2015-PoC
20 M€
│ 40
Established by the European Commission
Spain at ERC
│ 41
Spain at ERC
Evolution of the number of applications with Spanish HI
Established by the European Commission
* 799 = 354 StG + 445 CoG
│ 42
Spain at ERC
Evolution of the % of applications with Spanish HI
Established by the European Commission
*
* 10,7% in StG and 12,4% in CoG
│ 43
Spain at ERC
Evolution of the number of grants with Spanish HI
Total: 236 grants
Established by the European Commission
*
* It includes StG2013 (14) and CoG2013 (20)
│ 44
Spain at ERC
Evolution of the % of grants with Spanish HI
Established by the European Commission
*
* It includes StG2013 and CoG2013
Spain at ERC
Success rates of applications with Spanish HI
Established by the European Commission
Scheme
2007
2008
StG
AdG
StG
2009
AdG
StG
2010
AdG
StG
2011
AdG
StG
2012
AdG
StG
2013
CoG
AdG
Total StG + CoG
Total AdG
Grand Total
* Excluding 2007
Submissions
Total
Spain
9167
567
2167
134
2503
227
1584
96
2873
234
2009
130
4080
350
2284
129
4741
454
2304
216
3329
354
3673
445
2408
294
30366
2631
12756
999
43122
3630
Funded
Succes rate
Total
Spain
Overall
Spain
299
23
3,3%
4,1%
282
14
13,0%
10,4%
245
19
9,8%
8,4%
245
12
15,5%
12,5%
436
25
15,2%
10,7%
271
13
13,5%
10,0%
486
27
11,9%
7,7%
301
15
13,2%
11,6%
566
26
11,9%
5,7%
321
15
13,9%
6,9%
300
14
9,0%
4,0%
312
20
8,5%
4,5%
284
13
11,8%
4,4%
*
2644
154
11,1%
6,3%*
1704
82
13,4%
8,2%
4348
236
11,9%*
7,0%*
│ 46
Spain at ERC
Top host institutions in Spain
236 grantees at 61 research institutions in Spain
StG+CoG
CSIC
UPF
UB
CRG
ICFO
ICIQ
CREI
CNIO
IRB
UAB
UAM
UPV‐EHU
CNIC
UZ
USC
CIMNE
UN
UV
25
8
Established by the European Commission
AdG
15
10
10
4
9
3
8
3
5
2
4
3
2
5
3
4
3
3
3
3
5
1
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
3
2
2
3
1
ERC Starting, Consolidators and Advanced grant calls 2007 – 2013
Current host institutions; data as of 10/12/2013
│ 47
Spain at ERC
Distribution of grants by domain and panel
ERC Starting and Advanced grant calls 2007 – 2013
Established by the European Commission
Life Sciences
Panel
Total
Spain
%
LS1
Molecular & structural siology & siochemistry
188
6
3,2%
LS2
Genetics, genomics, bioinformatics & systems biology
179
12
6,7%
LS3
Cellular and developmental biology
160
12
7,5%
LS4
Physiology, pathophysiology & endocrinology
180
14
7,8%
LS5
Neurosciences & neural disorders
214
7
3,3%
LS6
Immunity & infection
174
7
4,0%
LS7
Diagnostic tools, therapies & public health
215
14
6,5%
LS8
Evolutionary, population & environmental biology
156
7
4,5%
LS9
Applied life sciences & biotechnology
106
7
6,6%
1572
86
5,5%
│ 48
Spain at ERC
Distribution of grants by domain and panel
ERC Starting and Advanced grant calls 2007 – 2013
Established by the European Commission
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Panel
Total
Spain
%
PE1
Mathematics
239
12
5,0%
PE2
Fundamental constituents of matter
243
16
6,6%
PE3
Condensed matter physics
216
14
6,5%
PE4
Physical & Analytical Chemical sciences
186
10
5,4%
PE5
Materials & Synthesis
239
20
8,4%
PE6
Computer science & informatics
220
8
3,6%
PE7
Systems & communication engineering
139
4
2,9%
PE8
Products & process engineering
189
15
7,9%
PE9
Universe sciences
138
5
3,6%
PE10
Earth system science
151
2
1,3%
1960
106
5,4%
│ 49
Spain at ERC
Distribution of grants by domain and panel
ERC Starting and Advanced grant calls 2007 – 2013
Established by the European Commission
Social Sciences and Humanities
Panel
Total
Spain
%
SH1
Individuals, institutions & markets
142
19
13,4%
SH2
The social world, diversity and common ground
183
3
1,6%
SH3
Environment ,space and population
86
3
3,5%
SH4
The human mind and its complexity
182
9
4,9%
SH5
Cultures & cultural production
89
3
3,4%
SH6
The study of the human past
130
7
5,4%
812
44
5,4%
│ 50
The European Research Council
Established by the European Commission
More information on
http://erc.europa.eu
National Contact Point in your country
http://erc.europa.eu/national-contact-points
Follow us on
EuropeanResearchCouncil
ERC_Research
│ 51