Inmigrantes

INTEGRATION OF THE IMMIGRANTS IN EUROPE
In this project we aim to compare and contrast the different situations of immigration in the EU, and
specifically in both, Spain and Ireland. These last two for being our mother country, and the country we
actually live in.
INTRODUCTION
Migration is a social phenomenon as old as mankind. In their search for better living conditions, humans have
always been moving from some places to others thus causing more or less conflict with the native
communities. These kinds of conflicts are caused by a clash of cultures and this is, most times, hard to
overcome. Differences in the ways of living may very often result in a confrontation between the immigrants
and the native inhabitants of a region. The immigrants' attempt to preserve their culture and customs is
frequently seen as a threat by the native community who may very likely reject these newcomers. Ironically,
History shows that the very same prosperous countries that feared immigration are now somewhat forgetful
about the times when their economy wasn't doing so well and their citizens were forced to emigrate also,
hoping for better living conditions.
Among many other reasons there are two major causes for today's foreign influxes, being these poverty and
hard living conditions such as wars or political persecution some of the most common ones.
Situation in Europe
Since WWII, almost all EU countries, one after the other, have discovered the issue of immigration, while for
decades or centuries they were only emigration countries. France is the only European country facing
immigration for almost two centuries. UK, Germany, Holland, Scandinavia, Italy, Spain, all of them have
been exporting their human resources all along the XVIIIth, XIXth and early XXth century. On the contrary,
nobody or almost nobody was coming to settle in their homeland.
Only France during the XIXth century and first half of XXth century was facing the issue of immigration.
Polish, Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese, then Algerians, Moroccans, Turkish, Black Africans, Vietnamese, all
came along in the past 200 years. France therefore developed, decades after decades, a certain model of
integration of these large groups of immigrant based on a complete cultural assimilation. Individuals could
keep and cultivate their own identities but this task was not incumbent to France, neither should it create
troubles with the general society. In a word, the children had to be French supposing that the family intended
to stay in the country.
The other EU member−States discovered immigration only a few decades ago. In the past decades, almost all
EU Member−States developed a different model where basically the immigrants were asked to work and
create no troubles in their welcoming country, and in exchange, they could keep their cultural traditions,
including languages, to transmit them to their children. Under this approach, one could have found that
ultimately these immigrants were supposed to leave and go back home at some stage. Their children therefore
should not loose their original identity. But the problem is that this assumption was wrong. Most immigrants
did not intend to go back home; and the growing European need for human resources make it even less
probable right now.
Therefore, since a few years, and in the wake of the current interrogations following the September 11th
crisis, more and more countries in the EU are starting to reconsider their approach to immigrants, especially in
its very characteristics of integration or not. Europe's future (internally and externally) will depend largely on
how it will deal with the immigration issue.
1
In the decades to come, immigration will increase (as Europeans don't make babies. Italy for instance will be
faced by a 45% decline in young people proportion in its population in 2020 compared to now. Most EU
countries will have a 30% decline) and the issues will raise in terms of culture, religion, languages. Each of
our country by itself, and the EU as a whole have to decide if they want the immigrants children to be
Europeans (and therefore French, German, Dutch, Italians, depending where they settle), or they we want
them to stay Foreigners and, in the end, "second−class" citizens.
By facing this fact it is not so difficult to build a common European policy on immigration. Of course this is
not easy and requires significant changes in the way of thinking of many European countries when it comes to
their identity. But it addresses the issue of whether our European cultural identities are made of common
blood or common concepts and values.
As a result of migration flows in recent decades, substantial populations of different religious beliefs have
come to live permanently in most of the member States of the Council of Europe. The importance of the
cultural and religious aspects of the immigrants' integration process in European societies has been recognised
on several occasions by the Council of Europe. It is of crucial importance to set up dialogue structures
allowing broadening knowledge and strengthening awareness of religious communities and religious
pluralism.
IMMIGRANTS IN EUROPE FACE JOB DISCRIMINATION
Nowadays, however, the migrant workers face 'significant and disturbing levels of discrimination in access to
employment' in the developed countries, at least one in every three job applications posed by migrant/ethnic
minority candidates met with discrimination.
A recent study by the International Labour Organisation on employment access of migrants to four European
countries, found that, at least one−third of all advertised vacancies were effectively closed to applicants from
migrant or ethnic minority groups as a result of discriminatory hiring practices.
Discrimination is particularly high in service sectors, notably in branches where contact with clients is an
essential element of the services provided, but this can be an extremely worrying fact since services are
precisely the area where job growth is strongest nowadays.
As migrant and minority workers tend to be highly concentrated in traditional manufacturing sectors, they risk
suffering from both reduced job prospects and limited mobility.
While such factors as insufficient language skills or training deficiencies might explain higher unemployment
levels for the first−generation migrants, discrimination in access to employment is likely to be an important
factor for subsequent generations.
In fact, upon their arrival in Western Europe, many migrants have been prepared to work for lower wages and
under poorer conditions than native workers would normally accept. Most of them of course 'aspire to a better
future for their children and grandchildren'.
However, migrants and migrant−descended populations suffer from long−term unemployment. But when they
are employed, they tend to be disproportionately employed and concentrated in the type of poorly paid and
insecure jobs that are rejected by the native population. What's more, migrants and their descendants suffer
from disproportionately higher unemployment rates than nationals.
The exclusion or isolation and segregation resulting from this discrimination feed the very stereotypes and
prejudices which originally generated it − to the detriment of not only the migrant and ethnic minority
communities, but also to the
2
society as a whole. And this fact can be considered as be one of the most important intercultural issues to
solve nowadays, because the total number of migrants around the world surpasses 120 million and continues
to grow, and if we are not to do something about it, we'll find ourselves in a completely segregated world, full
of racism. Overall if we talk in terms of the E.U, defined to be the region with the highest concentrations of
non−nationals in the world, with 26−30 million of such residents, we should take immediate legal action
against discrimination if we want to reach a complete and homogenous European Union.
Situation in Ireland
If we centre our attention on the Irish immigrants situation, we have to point out that Ireland is not an
immigrant country, (attending to the official line taken by the Department of Justice in regard to the reception
of people from foreign parts), But in fact there are now quite a large number of immigrants into Ireland, of
whom only a small proportion are asylum seekers. In the six years from 1992 through 1997 there were
220,000 immigrants.
In 1997 immigration reached a high point of 44,000, with a net inflow of 15,000. The figures that are
available do not specify who these 44,000 people were or why they came. We know only that 20,000 came
from the UK, 8,100 from other countries in the European Union, 6,600 from the USA, and 9,300 from the rest
of the world. It can be presumed that many of them were Irish people returning from overseas after some time
abroad.
In the past five years about 7000 refugees have arrived in Ireland, the majority of them seeking political
asylum. They have come from Bosnia and other eastern European countries, Turkey and the Middle East and
sub−Saharan Africa. About 1,500 of these refugees are from Romania, a substantial proportion of whom are
Roma or Gypsies. But it was the arrival of about 250 Romanians, nearly all Gypsies, to the port of Rosslare,
Wexford, in Southern Ireland in the last two weeks of July and the first week of August (1998) which really
brought the immigration issue to a head.
Ireland has always had a very restrictive policy towards immigrants, except perhaps those coming from
Britain. The main explanation for this is that Ireland was for many years quite poor in European terms, with
massive emigration acting as a safety valve to keep high unemployment at bay. Another important reason is
that Ireland does not have the historical 'baggage' of overseas colonies that has given rise to immigration into
other European countries. Up to recently most of the refugees who came to Ireland were 'programme'
refugees, that is, they came in groups as part of a government programme responding to war, persecution or
mass expulsions in other countries. For instance about 800 Bosnians have come since 1992. Up to a few years
ago, refugees that came to Ireland did not fare particularly well. Most of the 530 Hungarians who arrived in
1956 left within a few years, most of them going to Canada.
Immigration brings the richness of many cultures to Ireland, in the same way that Ireland has brought its
culture to many countries. But there is clearly a lot of resistance to this way of looking at things. Throughout
most of our recent history the emphasis has been on the value of our homogeneity and distinctiveness, and of
a Gaelic, Catholic Ireland. The Irish are deeply conservative in relation to culture, and our comparative
poverty and isolation has 'protected' us from having to make decisions about multi−ethnicity. It is impossible
to point to any one country, and say for certain that it has been better or worse off for being multi−ethnic. Yet
there is no doubt that some of the most vibrant countries of the modern world, the United States, Canada,
Australia, have successfully integrated scores of different cultures. Where problems have occurred it is
because the cultures have not integrated, or have been prevented from integrating, and have remained isolated
'globs', indifferent or even hostile to one another.
Ireland can benefit enormously from its immigrant population if it has the courage to promote the maximum
degree of integration which is compatible with preserving the dignity and self−identity of immigrants and
native Irish alike. It has to be recognised that the cultural needs of immigrant peoples change over time. It is
3
unacceptable, for example, that the Department of Education refuses to provide any special resources in
schools for the teaching of English to the children of asylum seekers, even though their formal education may
have been completed while their parents were waiting for a decision. The policy of putting asylum seekers
into a limbo of several years duration, where they are prohibited from working, and they and their families
discouraged from learning English, is souring the whole induction process for immigrants
Most of the concern expressed about immigration into Ireland has been directed at asylum−seekers and
refugees. Concern has been expressed in different ways. There has rarely been any direct attack on refugee
seekers by the newspapers, but the manner of reporting of some newspapers suggests an anti−refugee slant.
There is no doubt that the number of asylum seekers coming to Ireland has increased in the last couple of
years because there are more refugees in the world than ever before. Today at least fifty million people
world−wide suffer forced displacement. Also the Irish economy is doing well and there are perceived
opportunities for work.
. The situation in Spain
At the moment Spain is enjoying an economic boom that is attracting immigration from places as varied as
the African continent, South America, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. The situation these
newcomers may find in Spain varies mainly in accordance to their ethnic group, native tongue, culture and
professional qualification. Obvious as it may seem, conditions of living are much easier for the highly
qualified and trades people and, on the contrary, much more difficult for those who are unskilled workers.
Because unemployment and foreign influxes are major economical and political issues in Western Europe,
many locals see new settlers as competitors when applying for jobs. Many other people disagree with this
statement since it is a well−known fact that most immigrants end up taking underpaid jobs that the natives
wouldn't normally take.
Before World War II, citizens from any country could immigrate to other countries with no problem at all. At
that time immigration laws were relatively permissive and there was much less bureaucracy in order to get
green cards and work permits. However, this period of recent history was well known for the raising of
nationalistic movements. We cannot forget about the evolution of the Austro−Hungarian Empire, for instance,
and the more recent incidents in Serbia and former Bosnia. Nationalistic wars ended in overthrows and the
establishments of autonomic powers, which inevitably led to tighten the border gates. The UK and France
soon passed laws on immigration that became good examples of cultural prejudice. In those times, the
Spanish Government wasn't even taking this kind of laws into consideration, they were rather concerned about
other countries passing these laws, countries like Germany, where a lot of Spaniards emigrated to, Spain
suffering shortages of all kinds under Franco's regime.
Decades have gone by and Spain has experienced amazing economic and social advances since then.
Immigration has become a major problem for Spanish State also. The social debate has ended in the passing
of a new Immigration Law supported by socialists, communists and nationalists alike.
We, Spaniards, know that, being our islands only a few kilometres off the coast of Africa, the immigration
rate is very high. Africans come to the archipelago hoping for better living and working conditions. False
expectations encouraged by unscrupulous people attract many human groups who, in exchange for important
sums of money, are willing to be smuggled into Spain. Their dreams frequently end in people dying in the sea
as a result of the poor conditions of the boats on which they try to reach Canarian land. Pregnant women,
children, parents who leave their families behind , all kinds of people are taking the risk of crossing the waters
in order to reach these islands. Even those who success in doing so have to face trouble with law and are very
likely to become homeless and very poor or, in most cases, they are sent back to their countries in less than 72
hours. It seems such a big sacrifice yet some of them will try one more time.
4
We have been doing some research on immigration problems in the Canary Islands. We have also known that
illegal immigration rate is very high in the Canaries and that this is a cause of great conflict in our society.
The following are, in our opinion, three of the most important aspects of Spanish new Immigration Law:
• Even illegal immigrants have the same rights as Spanish citizens as far as health care and education
are concerned.
• Those who have been working in Spain for at least 5 years and are financially independent have the
right to apply for the residence permit.
• All immigrants, legal and illegal, currently living in Spain have the right to apply for a work permit.
We have read a lot of newspaper articles for this class and the following are some of the ones that we
considered most significant:
First boatchild born in Cadiz
A 19−year old pregnant woman from Nigeria successfully reached Spain shore after twelve hours of sailing
dangerously on a raft. She finally gave birth to a baby girl on Cadiz while Spanish authorities were debating
on whether or not the newly born should be given the Spanish nationality. In the end, the baby girl has been
refused the Spanish citizenship and consequently, she will have to take the Nigerian one.
Our opinion
We all agreed that the baby should be given the Spanish nationality and her mother should be allowed to stay
in Spain with her.
33 immigrants, 4 children among them, reached Fuerteventura by boat.
First raft reached Tarifa land at about 3 a.m. with 17 immigrant people on board, 4 of them were minors. The
second boat arrived at around 6 a.m. and the police found 16 illegal immigrants on it. State delegates for
immigration affairs said that those of them with no papers would be sent back to their countries of origin in no
longer than 72 hours.
Our opinion
We think it is unfair to repatriate these children who risked their lives in order to have something to eat. We
all agreed they should have the right to be helped and our Government should supply them with food and
education, as they deserve it as much as we do.
STREET POLL
These are some samples of what people think of immigration
A shop assistant
• What is your opinion on immigration?
I think it is a lot of people's life expectancy. Many people live under terrible conditions in their countries and
try to look for a better life by migrating to another country.
2. What, in your opinion, are the reasons for them to leave their countries?
5
Unemployment and hard conditions of life. But mainly unemployment.
3. What kind of problems do you think they encounter when they arrive here?
Society rejects them.
4. Do you think they could steal the job from you?
No, I don't think so.
5. Do you know any immigrant?
I do, one of my neighbours is from another country. He really had a bad time when he first came to live
here. The rest of the neighbours gave him a hard time and accused him of stealing their jobs. They also
rejected him because he is black. But he is currently doing OK and is well integrated in society; he has got
a job and is a very good neighbour.
6. What do you think of their work qualifications? Do you think they would be able to get any
white−collar job?
Some do, others don't. A lot of them have degrees in engineering, medicine others lack in degrees and their
working skills are very basic. The neighbour I mentioned before is Cuban and he is a doctor but he is not
working as such but as a nurse for a charity organisation, and has managed to get by.
7. Do you think they come to settle down here or do they always tend to go back to the places they
belong to?
Most of them come with the idea of getting a job so that they can send some money and help the families they
have left behind. On the contrary, most of those who succeed on achieving some social status tend to stay as
they feel fully integrated.
Her general opinion on the matter
This lady has a positive opinion on immigration. She sympathises with them and thinks they are needy people
who try hard for living with dignity. She does not see anything bad in immigration and stands up for her
neighbour. We think she is very realistic about the matter.
A Mason
1−What is your opinion on immigration?
People from other countries who try to improve their living conditions.
2−What, in your opinion, are the reasons for them to leave their countries?
Poverty, wars
3−What kind of problems do you think they encounter when they arrive here?
Underpaid jobs, exploitation, racial discrimination, prostitution, a sense of being very far away from their
families, They don't feel so good in here.
6
4− Do you think they could steal our jobs?
Yes, if it wasn't because they take some jobs we could apply for them and get them.
5−Do you think they are qualified enough to be able to get any good job?
I don't think so, how could they become skilful workers if they don't even have money to feed themselves?
6− Do you believe they should have the same rights as Spanish citizens concerning housing, employment
?
Yes, I do.
7−Do you know where they usually come from?
Africa.
8−Do you have any idea about how they feel when they first come to live here?
Completely out of place.
9−Do you think they come to settle down here or do they always tend to go back to the places they
belong to?
Most of them settle here unless the political situations in their countries change.
His general opinion on the matter:
I believe they should not be let in our country. They should buy "round−trip boat tickets" because I think the
ones who succeed in reaching Spain end up making their living by stealing jobs from us and there is already
enough unemployment in Spain. That is why I am against immigration.
If you are against:
11−What would you do if you were one of them?
I would do the same. I am against immigration, but if I were them I would probably do the same.
12− What kind of help should we supply these countries with so that their citizens didn't have the need
to immigrate to other countries?
They should teach them how to read and how to cultivate the land, and they ought to help them pay their
debts.
An owner of a photo studio who married an Indian immigrant
1−What is your opinion on immigration?
We are experiencing it every day, people leave their countries in order to get something to eat and live in a
better way. Unfortunately, they come here and survive in terrible conditions, people often mistreat them.
2−What, in your opinion, are the reasons for them to leave their countries?
7
Hunger, wars, they need money to support the families they leave behind, some come fleeing from their
countries' political situations
3−What kind of problems do you think they encounter when they arrive here?
Once they succeed in reaching Spain, most just manage to survive with very little as they may have already
spent all their money on coming here. Those who take the risk of coming by boat usually have no food, no
money, no proper clothing and not even papers.
4− Do you think they could steal our jobs?
No, I don't think so. As human beings they should have the right to get a job like any other citizen does; the
problem is that, as unemployment is an important issue in our country, people fear the immigrants may steal
the jobs from us.
There are jobs out there that people don't want to take. Nowadays people would like to stay home and get a
salary anyway, I mean people like the easy way: to be able to eat well and live fine in exchange for doing
nothing.
5− Do you know any immigrant?
I do. I could tell you the story of someone I know who left Algiers fleeing from the war. I am helping him at
the moment so he can get a residence card. He is working now and earns his living honestly. Some lawyers I
know are also helping him so that he can legalise his situation.
6−Do you think they are qualified enough to be able to get any good job?
Yes, I think so.
7−Do you believe they should have the same rights as Spanish citizens concerning housing, employment
?
Of course, as long as they are honest and work hard, like any other person.
8−Do you know where they usually come from?
From Cuba, lots of people come from Africa also. I keep in contact with the Red Cross and try to get legal
assistance to help them with their situations.
9−Do you have any idea about how they feel when they first come to live here?
They are eager to find a place that welcomes them, that shelters them by giving them work permits, residence
cards , some hope to achieve the status of political refugees. Most of them would like to go back some time but
some get married here and settle down in the canaries. In any case, they don't loose contact with their
countries. I also think there is racism in Spain although some people would deny this. I am not a racist but I
have witnessed racist acts, I was even kicked out from my job at an American company for marrying an
Indian.
Conclusion
We have learnt a lot by working on this paper about immigration and how it affects our society. The issue is
causing a lot of problems of racial discrimination, prostitution, delinquency , but we tend to think that
8
controlled immigration could enhance people's vision of life with more culture and knowledge about other
countries, their people, and their customs. Why, then, do we choose to close the door to other means of
enriching our society? Everybody's right to live should be respected and everybody should be given a second
opportunity without being forced to forget about his/her own culture, religion, customs Everybody should
have the right to be different. We think that countries where immigration is a problem should reach an
agreement and help more. We, civilians, ought to take part in the debate as the whole matter is affecting our
lives, we should stop and think about our attitudes and behaviour and sympathise with the immigrants. But
first we should start by asking ourselves one question: "Am I a racist?"
9