Subido por Freddy A. Manayay

Sirtuinas

Anuncio
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Plant Science
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/plantsci
Review article
Review: The plant sirtuins
T
Weiping Zheng*
School of Pharmacy, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu Province, PR China
A R T I C LE I N FO
A B S T R A C T
Keywords:
Plant
Sirtuin
Deacetylation
Deacylation
Biology
Agriculture
The sirtuin family of intracellular enzymes are able to catalyze a unique β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (βNAD+)-dependent Nε-acyl-lysine deacylation reaction on histone and non-histone protein substrates. Since
2000, the sirtuin family members have been identified in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes; tremendous accomplishments have also been achieved on the mechanistic and functional (pharmacological) understanding of
the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation reaction. Among the eukaryotic organisms, past research has been focused
more on the yeast and mammalian sirtuins than on the plant sirtuins, however, the very presence of sirtuins in
various plant species and the functional studies on plant sirtuins published thus far attest to the importance of
this particular subfamily of eukaryotic sirtuins in regulating the growth and development of plants and their
responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. In this review, an integrated and updated account will be presented on
the biochemical, cellular, and functional profiles of all the plant sirtuins identified thus far. It is hoped that this
article will also set a stage for expanded efforts in the identification, characterization, and functional interrogation of plant sirtuins; and the development and exploration of their chemical modulators (activators and
inhibitors) in plant research and agriculture.
1. Introduction
The sirtuin family comprises a group of intracellular proteins that
are able to catalyze the β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (βNAD+)-dependent Nε-acyl-lysine deacylation on histone and non-histone protein substrates (Fig. 1) [1–9]. While this sirtuin-catalyzed
deacylation represents the predominant type of enzymatic activity for
the majority of sirtuin family members, certain bacterial and fungal
sirtuins have been known to predominantly catalyze the β-NAD+-dependent mono-ADP-ribosylation of proteins (Fig. 2) [7]; both Nε-acyllysine-dependent and -independent mechanisms could account for this
enzymatic reaction.
Since the discovery of the sirtuin family founding member yeast
silent information regulator 2 (sir2) protein in 2000 [15], our understanding of this family of enzymes has been steadily and substantially
expanded, as detailed below. First, the sirtuin family members have
been found in organisms from all the three evolutionary domains of life
(i.e. bacteria, archaea, and eukarya) [16]. In the eukarya domain, sirtuins have been identified in such organisms as mammals (including
humans), plants, human parasites, and fungi (including yeasts). With
seven sirtuins (i.e. SIRT1-7) having been identified thus far, mammals
(including humans) represent the organisms in all the three life domains that harbor the greatest number of sirtuins. Second, while the
⁎
first native sirtuin substrates to be identified were the nuclear histone
proteins, more and more non-histone proteins have been identified over
the years to be also native sirtuin substrates [6,9]; moreover, while
many of these non-histone substrates are also nuclear proteins like the
histone proteins, many others are localized in mitochondria and cytosol
in a eukaryotic cell, which is consistent with the subcellular localization
of sirtuins in nucleus, mitochondria, and cytosol in a eukaryotic cell
[8,9]. Third, since the discovery that the yeast sir2 protein was able to
catalyze the side chain deacetylation of the Nε-acetyl-lysine residue on
histone proteins, many sirtuin family members have been found over
the years to be also able to catalyze Nε-acetyl-lysine deacetylation on a
variety of proteins, and many sirtuins were found to be actually more
proficient in catalyzing the deacylation of Nε-acyl-lysine residues with
acyl groups bulkier and physicochemically different than acetyl, with
notable examples of such acyl groups depicted in Fig. 1 [4,5,7,8].
Fourth, consistent with the above findings, the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation has been increasingly demonstrated to play an important
regulatory role in multiple vital cellular processes such as transcription,
metabolism, and DNA damage repair [2,5,17–27]. Our mechanistic and
pharmacological understandings of the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation
reaction have also been tremendously enhanced over the years. Specifically, a fairly detailed mechanistic view of this unique β-NAD+-dependent enzymatic deacylation reaction, as depicted in Fig. 3, has been
*corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected].
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2020.110434
Received 21 October 2019; Received in revised form 5 January 2020; Accepted 1 February 2020
Available online 04 February 2020
0168-9452/ © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
tissues/developmental stages and subcellular compartments, which has
been demonstrated in multiple studies on the functional roles of the
plant sirtuins. The following section will be devoted to a discussion on
such reported functional roles which can be mediated by the deacylation of the histone proteins or the non-histone proteins.
3. The functional roles of the plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation
on histone or non-histone proteins in Arabidopsis, rice, and
Phaeodactylum
The lysine Nε-acylation/deacylation on core histone proteins that
constitute the core histone octamer of the nucleosome, i.e. histone
proteins H3, H4, H2A, and H2B, has been an established epigenetic
switch whose operation has been demonstrated to play an important
role in regulating important cellular processes via gene expression
modulation [53,54], since these histone proteins coexist with DNA
double helix in nucleosome and therefore the lysine side chain acylation/deacylation on histone proteins and the ensuing changes in the
stereoelectronic properties of the modified lysine side chains and their
interaction strength with the negatively charged (under physiological
pH) DNA double helix would directly modulate the accessibility of the
DNA segments on the nucleosome to transcriptional machinery. In
specific, acylation would convert a positively charged (under physiological pH) lysine side chain to a neutral acylated lysine side chain,
thereby weakening its interaction with the DNA double helix that winds
upon the core histone octamer, leading to an activation of the expression of certain genes; on the other hand, deacylation would engender an
opposite effect, i.e. a suppression of gene expression. While the lysine
residues on histone proteins can be Nε-acylated with enzymatic reactions catalyzed by histone acyltransferases [53,54], the deacylation of
the resulting Nε-acyl-lysine residues can be accomplished with the enzymatic reactions catalyzed either by the Zn2+-containing family of
deacylases [53,55] or by the β-NAD+-dependent sirtuin family of
deacylases [3–5,7,8,53]. Therefore, by participating in a dynamic establishment of the epigenetic lysine Nε-acylation/deacylation switch on
histone proteins, the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation reaction also contributes to a dynamic regulation of various cellular processes via
modulating the expression of the genes for other cellular proteins such
as those involved in cellular metabolism. A unique feature of the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation reaction is its β-NAD+-dependence, therefore, this enzymatic reaction can be regulated by the cellular metabolic
status that can impact the intracellular β-NAD+ concentration.
Theoretically speaking, histone proteins can be the native substrates
for the plant sirtuins recorded in Table 1 with a nuclear localization,
which has been experimentally demonstrated for several plant sirtuins.
In Arabidopsis thaliana [37], studies with the AtSRT1 wild-type,
knock-down, and over-expression plant lines revealed that the nuclear
sirtuin AtSRT1 exhibited a suppressive action toward glycolysis via
repressing the expression of the genes and thus the activities of certain
enzymes of the glycolytic pathway, mediated by the catalytic deacetylation of the K9-acetylated histone protein H3 (H3K9ac) at the promoter regions; these enzymes include hexokinase (HK), pyruvate kinase
(PK), phosphofructose kinase (PFK), and enolase. Moreover, the
AtSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation of H3K9ac at the promoter regions of
ZAT10, LOS2, RD29A, and RD29B led to a repression of the expression
of these four stress-responsive genes, resulting in an attenuated tolerance to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) treatment (a type of
abiotic stress) and NaCl and mannitol treatments (salt and osmotic
stresses, respectively, another two types of abiotic stress). Further,
AtSRT1 was also found to exhibit a stimulatory action toward mitochondrial respiration (enhanced CO2 production), presumably also
due to the AtSRT1-catazyed deacetylation of H3K9ac at the promoter
region of relevant genes. Fig. 4 schematically illustrates the transcriptional repression of a target gene by the AtSRT1-catalyzed H3K9ac
deacetylation, which could be an epigenetic mechanism also applicable
to other plant sirtuins.
Fig. 1. The sirtuin-catalyzed β-NAD+-dependent Nε-acyl-lysine deacylation on
protein substrates. Example R-C(=O)- removable by sirtuins are indicated. In
the case with the plant sirtuins, protein substrates can be histone proteins (e.g.
H3) or non-histone proteins (e.g. AtMBP-1 and OsGAPDH1), whose deacylation
would be important in regulating the growth and development of plants and
their responses to biotic and abiotic stresses (see below for details).
derived from elegant biochemistry and chemical biology studies
[3,8,28]; this enzymatic deacylation reaction has also been regarded as
a contemporary target for developing novel therapeutic agents for
human diseases such as cancer, metabolic diseases, and neurodegeneration [28,31–33]; And quite a few potent and selective inhibitors
have been identified for the deacylation reaction catalyzed by human
sirtuins, mostly by chemical library screening and catalytic mechanismbased design [3,4,8,28,31,33–35]. Among the eukaryotic sirtuins, past
research has been mostly focused on those of yeasts and mammals
(including humans), however, the very presence of sirtuins in various
plant species
(e.g. Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa) and the functional studies
on plant sirtuins published thus far attest to the importance of this
particular subfamily of eukaryotic sirtuins in regulating the growth and
development of plants and their responses to biotic and abiotic stresses.
In the following sections, an integrated and updated account will be
presented on the biochemical, cellular, and functional profiles of all the
plant sirtuins that have been identified since 2002 when the first plant
sirtuins (i.e. AtSRT1 and AtSRT2) were identified from the genome
sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana [36]. It is hoped that this account will
also set a stage for expanded efforts in the identification, characterization, and functional interrogation of plant sirtuins; and the development and exploration of their chemical modulators (activators and
inhibitors) in plant research and agriculture.
2. Overview of the plant sirtuin subfamily
Table 1 summarizes the enzymatic activity, the native substrate, and
the organ/tissue/developmental stage and intracellular distribution
reported thus far for the currently known plant sirtuins. It is obvious
from Table 1 that the plant sirtuins can be present in the three major
subcellular compartments in a eukaryotic cell, i.e. nucleus, mitochondrion, and cytosol, which is analogous to the scenario with mammalian
sirtuins; in addition, certain plant sirtuins may also be present in
chloroplast. Moreover, the plant sirtuin genes have an overall ubiquitous expression among plant organs/tissues/developmental stages such
as root, leaf, flower, and fruit, with individual sirtuin genes exhibiting
varied and unique expression preference among plant organs/tissues/
developmental stages. Further, in addition to acetyl, the acyl group of
Nε-acyl-lysines removable by the plant sirtuins can also be crotonyl
which has been found to be removable by OsSRT2, suggesting that the
catalytic removal of the acyl groups of Nε-acyl-lysines bulkier than
acetyl could be a general feature also for the plant sirtuins, like the
mammalian sirtuins. Furthermore, besides the histone proteins, certain
plant sirtuins also accept non-histone proteins as their native substrates,
such as AtMBP-1 by AtSRT1 and OsGAPDH1 by OsSRT1. These observations strongly suggest that the plant sirtuins play an important role
in regulating a variety of cellular processes occurring at various organs/
2
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
Fig. 2. The sirtuin-catalyzed mono-ADP-ribosylation reaction. Both Nε-acyl-lysine-dependent and -independent mono-ADP-ribosylation could be possible based on
the studies on the mono-ADP-ribosylation activity of several sirtuins [10–14]. ADP, adenosine diphosphate; Nu, nucleophile.
Fig. 3. The current version of the proposed chemical mechanism for the sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation reaction. ADP,
adenosine diphosphate; B: refers to a general base, such as the
neutral form of a histidine side chain [29]. Note: The depicted
route for the resolution of the bicyclic intermediate in the
presence of water to afford the two end products was proposed
based on the trapping of the thio version of the α-2′-O-alkylamidate intermediate (i.e. the 1′-SH-α-2′-O-alkylamidate intermediate wherein R = tridecyl) within SIRT2 active site
[30].
could be derived from the AtSRT2B-catalyzed acetyl-lysine deacetylation on histone proteins at the promoter region of these three genes.
As for the mitochondrial pool of AtSRT2B and the mitochondrial
AtSRT2A [38], they were both found in an in vitro assay to exhibit a βNAD+-dependent acetyl-lysine deacetylase activity. Moreover, they
were found in the study to primarily reside on the inner mitochondrial
membrane and to a lesser extent in the mitochondrial matrix. Since
AtSRT2A and AtSRT2B were predicted not to be integral membrane
proteins, their residence on the inner mitochondrial membrane presumably results from their physical association with certain integral
proteins in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Indeed, the Arabidopsis
ATP synthase and ATP/ADP carrier proteins AAC1/2/3 were found in
the study to represent the most notable examples of such integral
proteins. Moreover, by employing an AtSRT2 knock-out Arabidopsis
line, the lysine acetylation levels of these two types of integral proteins
were also found in the study to be increased in the absence of AtSRT2.
Therefore, these proteins could be bona fide endogenous substrates for
the acetyl-lysine deacetylation reaction catalyzed by AtSRT2A and
AtSRT2B. It was further found in the study that AtSRT2 knock-out resulted in a decreased coupling between the electron transport on inner
mitochondrial membrane and the ATP synthase-catalyzed production of
ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) while there was an increased uptake of ADP into the mitochondrial matrix via the ATP/ADP
carrier proteins AAC1/2/3 in such an Arabidopsis line. Taken together,
the acetyl-lysine deacetylation of these two major types of the proteins
seems to play an important role in regulating the energy metabolism in
mitochondria, and such deacetylation could be catalyzed by AtSRT2A
It is important to note that AtSRT1 also accepts the non-histone
protein cMyc-binding protein 1 of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMBP-1, a Nterm truncated alternatively translated product of the gene of the cytosolic glycolytic enzyme enolase) as its native substrate, and the
AtSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation of AtMBP-1 and H3K9ac were found to
be synergistic in conferring the above-described phenotypes, i.e. the
repressed expression of the glycolytic genes and the stress-responsive
genes yet the stimulated mitochondrial respiration. These observations
could be accounted for by the following: AtMBP-1 is a transcriptional
repressor on certain glycolytic and stress-responsive genes and its stability and thus transcriptional activity have been found to be enhanced
by its deacetylation by AtSRT1. The observed synergistic stimulatory
action of AtSRT1 and AtMBP-1 on mitochondrial respiration might result from the AtSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation of H3K9ac at the promoter region of relevant genes and the AtSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation
of AtMBP-1 and the ensuing transcriptional activity enhancement of
AtMBP-1.
As shown in Table 1, AtSRT2B can be present in mitochondrion or
nucleus [38,39]. As for the nuclear pool, histone proteins can possibly
serve as native substrates for this sirtuin to mediate some of its cellular
effects. In a study by Wang et al. [39], AtSRT2B (known as AtSRT2CDS3 in their original paper) was found to exert a suppressive action
against the basal response of Arabidopsis thaliana toward Pseudomonas
syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000, a bacterial pathogen and a type
of biotic stress) and a suppressive action toward the expression of
PAD4, EDS5, and SID2, the three critical genes in the biosynthetic
pathway of the stress hormone salicylic acid. This latter suppression
3
ptSRT5
ptSRT3
ptSRT2j ptSRT4j
GmSRT1
GmSRT2
GmSRT3
GmSRT4
VvSRT1
VvSRT2
SlSRT1
SlSRT2
Phaeodactylum tricornutum
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
nucleus
nucleus
mitochondrion
histone (putative)
H3K9ac; OsGAPDH1/2/5g
H3K9aci
histone Kcri
ptACSL1
—
—
histone H3 (putative)
deacetyl
deacetyl
decrotonyl
deacetyl
—
—
deacetyl (putative)
mitochondrionk
mitochondrionk
nucleus or cytosolk
plastid/nucleus
—
—
chloroplast/ mitochondrionk
chloroplast/ mitochondrionk
chloroplast /nucleusk
Nucleus
nucleus/ chloroplastk
chloroplast/ mitochondrionk
nucleus
nucleus/cytosol
nucleus
mitochondrion
H3K9acd; AtMBP-1
ATP synthase; ATP/ADP carriers
deacetyl
deacetyl
Intracellular location
Native substrates
Enzymatic activitiesb
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40–44]
[45,46]
[47]
[48]
—e
—
root; leaf; flower
bud; seedling; developing panicle
coleoptile; root; leaf; flag leaf; flower
—
—
leaf
—
root; flower; hypocotyl; seed
root; leaf; flower; fruit
leaf; flower; fruit
cotyledon; flower; the fruits at 10/20/30 days post anthesis
cotyledon; leaf; flower; the fruits at 30 days post anthesis, at break stage, and at pink
stage
sporophyte; sporophyte/archegoniophore; sporeling; thallus
archegoniophore; gametophore
antheridiophore; gametophore; sporophyte/archegoniophore
[52]
[51]
[49,50]
Ref
Organ/tissue /developmental stage distributionc
a
Even though additional plant sirtuin genes have also been identified from the genome sequences of other plant species [36], including zmSRT101 from Zea mays; taSRT803 from Triticum aestivum; leSRT1104 and
leSRT1105 from Lycopersicon esculentum; and mtSRT1303 from Medicago truncatula, this table only includes those plant sirtuins whose gene products (mRNA and/or protein) in various plant species have been
experimentally ascertained. b Experimental demonstrations include: (1) A chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiment with an antibody against H3K9ac revealed enhanced or diminished enrichment of H3K9ac at
the promoter region of a target gene following knock-down or over-expression of a plant sirtuin gene (for AtSRT1 and OsSRT1); (2) An immunoblotting assay with an antibody against Kac (acetyl-lysine), H3K9ac, or Kcr
(crotonyl-lysine) revealed decreased or increased level of the lysine acetylated substrate, H3K9ac, or histone Kcr in a plant line with enhanced or diminished/abolished expression of a plant sirtuin gene than that in the
wild-type plant line (for AtSRT1, AtSRT2A, AtSRT2B, OsSRT1, and OsSRT2); (3) The observed β-NAD+-dependent deacylation (deacetylation or decrotonylation) of a substrate (the lysine acetylated p53 peptide,
OsGAPDH1, or ptACSL1; or Boc-Lys(crotonyl)-AMC) catalyzed by a recombinant plant sirtuin in an in vitro deacylation assay (for AtSRT1, AtSRT2A, AtSRT2B, OsSRT1, OsSRT2, and ptSRT5); (4) The observed inhibition
of a plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacetylation reaction by the sirtuin deacetylase activity inhibitor nicotinamide or sirtinol (for AtSRT1, AtSRT2A, AtSRT2B, and ptSRT5). c Major sites/stages of distribution as determined
primarily via mRNA abundance assessment except for the use of gene promoter activity as a measure of the mRNA level in the case with AtSRT2B [39]. d The abbreviations used in this table: H3K9ac, the histone protein
H3 acetylated at K9; AtMBP-1, the cMyc-binding protein 1 of Arabidopsis thaliana; OsGAPDH1/2/5, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1/2/5 of Oryza sativa; Kcr, the crotonylated lysine residue; ptACSL1, the
long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1 of Phaeodactylum tricornutum. e “—” denotes “not yet reported”. f The protein products of the alternatively spliced AtSRT2 transcripts 1, 2, 5, and 7 only differ slightly at the N-termini and
all have an apparent molecular weight of 36 kDa, so they were collectively designated as AtSRT2A; however, the protein product of the alternatively spliced AtSRT2 transcript 3 has a much shorter C-terminus and has an
apparent molecular weight of 31 kDa, so it was designated as AtSRT2B which is also equivalent to the nuclear AtSRT2-CDS3 reported in ref. 39. g Specific acetyl-lysine residues deacetylated by OsSRT1 have been
identified for OsGAPDH1 as K57ac, K74ac, K120ac, K217ac, K261ac, and K265ac. h Also designated as OsSIR2b in ref. 46. i The mitochondrial OsSRT2 may accept lysine acylated non-histone proteins as its native
substrates, a possibility that needs further investigation. j The recombinant proteins of these two sirtuins of Phaeodactylum tricornutum could not be induced and purified as soluble proteins, as described in ref. 47. k
Possible locations predicted by online softwares.
Marchantia polymorpha
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)
Grape (Vitis vinifera)
Soybean (Glycine max)
MpSIRT4
MpSIRT5
MpSIRT6
AtSRT1
AtSRT2Af
AtSRT2Bf
AtSRT2Bf
OsSRT1
OsSRT2h
Arabidopsis thaliana
Rice (Oryza sativa)
Sirtuins
Plant species
Table 1
Plant sirtuins.a
W. Zheng
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
Fig. 4. A schematic illustration of the
transcriptional repression of a target
gene by the AtSRT1-catalyzed H3K9ac
deacetylation. TSS, transcription start
site; dsDNA, double-stranded DNA.
Note: (1) Only the 5′ and the 3′ ends of
the sense strand of dsDNA are indicated, even though the anti-sense
strand serves as the template of transcription. (2) Multiple negative signs
above the symbol of dsDNA denote the
negative sugar-phosphate backbone of dsDNA under physiological pH. (3) The 3′ region of dsDNA could be part of the depicted nucleosome, a piece of “naked” internucleosome dsDNA, or part of a neighboring nucleosome. (4) Examples of the target gene here include certain glycolytic and stress-responsive genes mentioned in the
text. (5) The side chain of H3K9 is positively charged under physiological pH, whereas that of H3K9ac is neutral.
while H3K9ac was found to be deacetylated by both OsSRT1 and
OsSRT2, both of these rice sirtuins were found to be unable to catalyze
the debutyrylation of Kbu, however, Kcr was found to be decrotonylated by OsSRT2 under both in vivo and in vitro conditions. These
findings seem to be counterintuitive given that OsSRT2 was previously
found to be localized in mitochondria when expressed in tobacco cells
[46], however, it could be possible for OsSRT2 to reside in nucleus in
rice cells under certain cellular conditions.
Consistent with a role of the OsSRT1-catalyzed H3K9ac deacetylation in rice cellular metabolism, a recent study indicated that this enzymatic H3K9ac deacetylation was important in repressing the expression of the genes of rice starch regulator 1 (RSR1, a transcription
factor) and certain amylases (starch degrading enzymes) (e.g. the αamylases OsAmy3B and OsAmy3E, the β-amylases OsBmy4 and
OsBmy9) and certain transposable element-related genes in developing
seeds, thus playing an important role in epigenetically regulating the
normal rice seed development [42]. Accordingly, the RNAi experiment
in the study revealed that OsSRT1 down-regulation resulted in an increased starch degradation and a concomitant decrease in starch
synthesis since RSR1 is a repressor of starch biosynthesis genes, leading
to the rice seed with lowered starch content and grain quality. In the
study, authors also found that OsSRT1 over-expression resulted in a
normal seed development in rice. Therefore, the OsSRT1-catalyzed
H3K9ac deacetylation seems to be required for not only the vegetative
growth of rice (see above) but also the rice reproductive development.
The findings from a recent study employing the OsSRT1 RNAi and
the OsSRT1 over-expression plants indicated that the OsSRT1-catalyzed
H3K9ac deacetylation was also able to repress glycolysis in rice via
transcriptional repression of multiple glycolytic genes such as those
coding for hexokinase (OsHK), 6-phosphofructokinase (OsPFK), fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (OsFBP), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (OsGAPDH) [40]. Interestingly, it was also found in the
study that OsSRT1 was also able to catalyze the acetyl removal from the
acetylated OsGAPDH1 (a typical glycolytic OsGAPDH protein in rice
with the other two being OsGAPDH2 and OsGAPDH5) at six lysine
residues, i.e. K57, K74, K120, K217, K261, and K265, and this OsSRT1catalyzed deacetylation was shown to result in decreased nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity of OsGAPDH1 upon certain
glycolytic genes such as those coding for OsPFK and OsFBP, thus further
suppressing glycolysis. Given the absolute β-NAD+-dependence of the
OsSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation, the glycolysis suppression by OsSRT1
would be important in regulating the growth and stress resistance of
rice cells, which would be mediated by the cellular β-NAD+ concentration fluctuation in response to varied metabolic and environmental cues.
A recent proteomics study indicated that the enzymes involved in
the fatty acid biosynthesis in the photosynthetic eukaryotic microalgae
Phaeodactylum tricornutum were mostly lysine acetylated [47]. Moreover, the plastid-localizing long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase (ptACSL1)
was found in the study to harbor six putative lysine acetylation sites,
and the pan-acetylated ptACSL1 non-enzymatically acetylated by
acetyl-phosphate was demonstrated to be effectively deacetylated in
and AtSRT2B in vivo.
In Oryza sativa (rice), the nuclear OsSRT1 [40–44] was found to
catalyze the deacetylation of H3K9ac at the promoter region of many
genes especially those whose protein products function in a variety of
metabolic pathways or in the stress response of the plant. OsSRT1 was
also found to catalyze the H3K9ac deacetylation on both DNA transposons and retrotransposons. In all cases, H3K9ac deacetylation is associated with repression of gene transcription.
Consistent with a role of the OsSRT1-catalyzed H3K9ac deacetylation in the stress response of rice, a RNAi experiment indicated that
OsSRT1 down-regulation resulted in an increased H3K9ac abundance,
accompanied with hydrogen superoxide (H2O2) production, genomic
DNA fragmentation, programmed cell death, and a lesion phenotype
[44]. However, the OsSRT1-overexpressing rice exhibited an enhanced
stress tolerance to paraquat challenge. Therefore, OsSRT1 seems to be
important in safeguarding rice against genome instability, cell damage,
and oxidative stress. The OsSRT1 RNAi experiment also revealed the
activated transcription of many transposons, retrotransposons, stressresponsive genes, and apoptotic genes.
The OsSRT1-catalyzed H3K9ac deacetylation was also found in a
recent study to play an important role in regulating leaf senescence in
rice [41]. Specifically, the authors of this study found that the methanol-jasmonate cascade was important in regulating leaf senescence
in rice and that OsSRT1 negatively regulates leaf senescence via the
H3K9ac deacetylation at the promoter regions and thus the repression
of the expression of the biosynthetic genes of the methanol-jasmonate
cascade, which include those encoding pectin methylesterase 1
(OsPME1), acyl-CoA oxidase 4-2 (OsACX4-2), allene oxide synthase 2
(OsAOS2), and jasmonate carboxy methyl transferase-2 (OsJMT-2).
While the H3K9ac deacetylation at the promoter region of the gene of
OsPME1 seemed to be catalyzed by OsSRT1, as revealed in a chromatin
immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiment with the wild-type rice and an
antibody against OsSRT1, this ChIP experiment also indicated that the
H3K9ac deacetylation at the promoter regions of the other genes may
be instead catalyzed by other deacetylases whose action on such spots
just got induced by OsSRT1.
The rice core histone proteins (H3, H4, H2A, and H2B) have been
found recently to be also post-translationally modified with Nε-butyryllysine (Kbu) and Nε-crotonyl-lysine (Kcr), and the differential weighted
distributions of Kbu, Kcr, and H3K9ac were suggested to be important
in fine-tuning the epigenetic regulation of the adaptation of rice to
environmental and metabolic cues [45]. Specifically, in response to the
stress conditions such as starvation (sustained darkness) and submergence, the levels of Kbu, Kcr, and H3K9ac on rice histone proteins
were all found to undergo changes but with differential dynamics, thus
resulting in differential weighted distributions of these three side chain
modified lysine residues, which in turn would differentially modulate
gene expression and thus optimize the adaptation of rice to internal and
external stresses. The afore-mentioned differential weighted distributions of Kbu, Kcr, and H3K9ac on rice histone proteins ought to be
derived from the differential formation and demodification dynamics of
these three side chain modified lysine residues. Within this context,
5
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
their involvement might be realized by the H3ac deacetylation they
respectively catalyze.
Three sirtuins (i.e. MpSIRT4, MpSIRT5, and MpSIRT6) were recently
identified in the lower plant Marchantia polymorpha [52]. In the study,
while essentially no change in the expression levels of these three sirtuins was found in response to high salt treatment (NaCl, 300 mM) and
high light treatment (photosynthetic flux, 200 μmol/(m2s)), their expression levels were found to be affected differentially in response to
the following different abiotic stresses. Specifically, in response to the
phytohormone ABA (100 μM) treatment (a type of abiotic stress), the
expression level of MpSIRT5 was found to be enhanced, whereas those
of MpSIRT4 and MpSIRT6 were essentially un-altered under the same
experimental condition; in response to the phytohormone indole-3acetic acid (IAA or auxin) (10 μM) treatment (another type of abiotic
stress), the expression level of MpSIRT4 was found to be decreased,
whereas those of MpSIRT5 and MpSIRT6 were essentially un-altered
under the same experimental condition; in response to heat shock at 37
°C, the expression level of MpSIRT4 in Marchantia gemmalings was
observed to be enhanced by ∼2-fold, whereas those of MpSIRT5 and
MpSIRT6 were essentially un-altered under the same experimental
condition. These findings suggest that the Marchantia sirtuins
MpSIRT4/5/6 were differentially involved in the plant responses to
different abiotic stresses.
vitro by ptSRT5, one of the four sirtuin proteins of Phaeodactylum tricornutum with the other three being ptSRT2-4. It should be noted that
(1) unlike ptSRT5, ptSRT3 was not able to catalyze the deacetylation of
the pan-acetylated ptACSL1 under the same experimental condition and
(2) the likelihood of ptSRT2 and ptSRT4 to be also capable of catalyzing
ptACSL1 deacetylation was not assessed in the study because the recombinant proteins of ptSRT2 and ptSRT4 could not be induced and
purified as soluble proteins for an in vitro study. By employing the sitedirected mutants of ptACSL1 and the site specifically acetylated
ptACSL1, the acetylation at K407 and K425 was found in the study to
significantly increase the enzymatic activity of ptACSL1. Moreover,
ptSRT5 and ptACSL1 can co-exist in the plastid of Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Therefore, the ptSRT5-catalyzed ptACSL1 deacetylation
could play an important role in regulating the activity of ptACSL1 inside cells.
4. The functional implications of the sirtuins in additional plant
species
As indicated in Table 1, sirtuins have also been identified in other
higher plants including grape (Vitis vinifera), soybean (Glycine max),
and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), as well as in lower plant Marchantia
polymorpha, however, the sirtuin research in these plant species has
thus far been mostly limited to the identification, the intracellular location profiling, and the organ/tissue/developmental stage expression
profiling of the relevant sirtuins, which is narrower in scope than those
described above for the sirtuins in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice. However, the specific organ/tissue/developmental stage expression profiles
of different sirtuins, and those in response to biotic and abiotic stresses,
would help to implicate them as important regulators in different
processes (e.g. leaf senescence) during plant development. As a general
note, the differential intracellular localization and organ/tissue/developmental stage expression profiles observed (and recorded in Table 1)
for different sirtuins in a given plant species would imply that these
different sirtuins would be involved in different intracellular processes.
Additional important and more specific findings for the sirtuins in these
additional plant species are highlighted below.
In grape, VvSRT2 was found to be expressed at generally greater
levels in both young and mature leaves than VvSRT1 [49]. Moreover,
while VvSRT1 expression in leaves and berries (fruits) largely did not
exhibit a significant level variation, the expression level of VvSRT2 was
found to be generally greater in leaves than in berries. Further, VvSRT2
expression was greater during setting in young leaves, whereas its expression was greater during the flowering time in mature leaves, with
peak expression in red leaves. These findings suggest that VvSRT2 could
be more involved in grape development (e.g. leaf senescence) than
VvSRT1.
In a recent study, it was found that the soybean sirtuins GmSRT2
and GmSRT4 exhibited significant expression level alterations in response to various abiotic stresses including cold (4 °C) and heat (42 °C)
shocks, flooding and drought conditions, and exposure to high salt
(NaCl, 250 mM) [48]. Specifically, GmSRT2 expression was observed to
be enhanced in response to cold and heat shocks and high salt treatment, however its expression was decreased under a drought condition
and largely did not alter under a flooding condition. GmSRT4 expression was observed to be decreased in response to cold and heat shocks
and high salt treatment, and its expression was increased under a
flooding condition and decreased under a drought condition. Moreover,
in response to the phytohormone ABA (10 μM) treatment (another type
of abiotic stress), essentially no alteration in GmSRT2 expression was
observed, however, there was a slightly enhanced GmSRT4 expression.
Further, in response to cold shock, the abundance of the acetylated
histone H3 protein (H3ac) was observed to be decreased, however, its
abundance was increased in response to heat shock. These findings
suggest that the soybean sirtuins GmSRT2 and GmSRT4 were differentially involved in the plant responses to different abiotic stresses, and
5. Pharmacology of the plant sirtuins
As described above, sirtuins have been identified in quite a few
plant species by now, and some of them have been demonstrated to
catalyze the β-NAD+-dependent Nε-acyl-lysine deacylation reaction on
histone and non-histone proteins and to play an important role in
regulating the growth and development of plants and their responses to
biotic and abiotic stresses. However, there has been a very narrow
scope in developing the chemical modulators (inhibitors and activators)
for the plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation and in exploring their potential applications in plant research and agriculture. Indeed, nicotinamide (a sirtuin deacylation reaction product (see Fig. 1) and also a
weak sirtuin deacylase activity pan-inhibitor [56,57]) and sirtinol (a
literature sirtuin deacetylase activity inhibitor [58]) are the only chemical modulators that have been reported thus far for the plant sirtuincatalyzed deacylation reaction, specifically the deacetylation reaction.
Nicotinamide was found to be capable of inhibiting the deacetylation of a lysine acetylated peptide derived from human tumor suppressor protein p53, which was catalyzed by the above-described
Arabidopsis mitochondrial SRT2A or SRT2B, with roughly equal inhibitory potency (IC50 ∼ 30 mM) [38]. Moreover, the above-described
inhibition of the transcriptional activity of OsGAPDH1 by its deacetylation by OsSRT1 was shown to be reversible by nicotinamide; for example, treatment with 100 mM of nicotinamide in a transient expression assay with rice protoplasts resulted in about 50 % increase in the
luciferase gene expression driven by the OsGAPDH1 promoter which
can be activated by the OsGAPDH1 protein [40]. Nicotinamide was
further found to inhibit the above-described ptSRT5-catalyzed deacetylation of the pan-acetylated ptACSL1, to the extent of an essentially
complete reversal of the acetylation level of ptACSL1 to that of the
control (in the absence of ptSRT5 and β-NAD+) under the reported
assay condition [47].
As described above, the OsSRT1-catalyzed OsGAPDH1 deacetylation was also shown to result in a decreased nuclear accumulation of
OsGAPDH1. While the observed reduction in the nuclear accumulation
of certain Lys-to-Arg deacetylation mimic mutants of OsGAPDH1 constituted one piece of supporting information for this notion, the necessity of the OsSRT1-catalyzed deacetylation reaction for the observed
reduction in the nuclear accumulation of OsGAPDH1 was also supported by the use of sirtinol [40]. Under the reported experimental
condition, the nuclear abundance of OsGAPDH1 was shown to be enhanced by ∼2-fold in rice protoplasts following sirtinol treatment.
6
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
family [63,65]; (e) to elucidate the 3-dimensional structures of the
plant sirtuins in the apo form or in the substrate (or chemical
modulator)-bound form.
(2) Medicinal chemistry and pharmacological characterization of the
plant sirtuins: As mentioned above, nicotinamide and sirtinol are
the only chemical modulators that have been reported thus far for
the plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacetylation. Therefore, it would be a
rewarding endeavor to expand the scope by developing novel cell
permeable inhibitors/activators with high potency and selectivity
(toward individual plant sirtuins) for the plant sirtuin-catalyzed
deacylation. For such endeavors, chemical library screening and
catalytic mechanism-based design [4,8,31,33,35,66] could be employed, and the insights gained from the above-described biochemical/structural characterization of the plant sirtuins could also
be helpful. On the other hand, the developed inhibitors/activators
could be employed in the afore-mentioned 3-dimensional structural
study on the plant sirtuins. Moreover, in addition to be potential
chemical biological tools in plant research and particularly in plant
sirtuin research, the developed inhibitors/activators may also have
agricultural applications. For example, to employ rice OsSRT1 activators to potentially enhance the rice grain yield while still
maintaining the grain quality. Developing and exploring the applications of plant sirtuin activators/inhibitors are ongoing efforts
in my laboratory.
Moreover, the above-described AtSRT1-catalyzed AtMBP-1 deacetylation was also shown to be inhibitable by sirtinol [37]; the lysine acetylation level of AtMBP-1 in a AtSRT1-GFP/AtMBP-1-FLAG double overexpression Arabidopsis line was found in the study to be enhanced by
∼1.8-3.5-fold following the treatment with 25μM of sirtinol.
It should be noted that sirtinol treatment was also shown to inhibit
the body axis formation and the vascularization in Arabidopsis seedlings
[58]; and also to cause defects in the root and shoot development, in the
meristem maintenance, and in the lateral root (LR) development in
Arabidopsis [59]. Mechanistically, the sirtinol treatment was shown to
alter the expression of the signaling components of phytohormones
auxin and cytokinin and that of the molecular regulators of LRs, stem
cells, and meristems. It was also suggested in another study that sirtinol
is metabolically transformed in Arabidopsis to two functionally important metabolites (i.e. 2-hydroxy-1-naphthaldehyde and 2-hydroxy-1naphthoic acid) to activate the auxin-inducible genes [60]. The inhibition of the Arabidopsis sirtuin-catalyzed deacetylation reaction by
sirtinol may also contribute to the observed phenotypes of the sirtinol
treatment, however, there has been no direct evidence for such a mechanistic contribution. It is worth noting that sirtinol was also employed in a study as a chemical tool to help dissect the auxin signal
transduction pathway in Arabidopsis [61], given the ability of sirtinol to
produce auxin-related developmental phenotypes. Specifically, a gene
termed as SIR1 was identified in the study that encodes a protein
component in the auxin signal transduction pathway.
It should be also noted that the above-described successful reversal
of the plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacetylation by nicotinamide and sirtinol
would also constitute as one more key characteristic feature for a further affirmation of the membership of the identified plant sirtuins in the
sirtuin family of enzymes.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
6. Conclusions and future perspectives
The support to the completion of this manuscript from the following
is highly appreciated: Jiangsu University, the Jiangsu provincial specially appointed professorship, and the Jiangsu provincial “innovation
and venture talents” award plan.
This article represents the first dedicated review on the subfamily of
eukaryotic sirtuins occurring in plants due to the availability of much
more information on the plant sirtuins now than before when several
relevant reviews were published, notably those published in 2008 [62],
2013 [63], and 2016 [64], in which the plant sirtuins were only covered within the context of the plant histone deacetylases or of the sirtuin family. In the current article, an integrated and up-to-date account
has been presented on the biochemical, cellular, and functional profiles
of all the plant sirtuins identified thus far. Specifically, as described,
sirtuins with varied intracellular locations and organ-/tissue-/developmental stage-specific distributions have been identified in quite a few
plant species by now, and some of them have been demonstrated to
catalyze the β-NAD+-dependent Nε-acyl-lysine deacylation reaction on
histone and non-histone proteins and to play an important role in
regulating the growth and development of plants and their responses to
biotic and abiotic stresses. Given that past research on eukaryotic sirtuins has been focused more on those in yeast and mammals (including
humans) than those in plants, it is hoped that this article will set a stage
for expanded efforts in the research on the relatively under-explored
plant sirtuins. In addition to the further identification, cellular profiling,
and functional interrogation of the sirtuins in various plant species, the
outstanding questions outlined below also warrant further investigation.
References
[1] A.E. Ringel, S.A. Tucker, M.C. Haigis, Chemical and physiological features of mitochondrial acylation, Mol. Cell 72 (2018) 610–624.
[2] Y. Li, et al., SIRT4 is the last puzzle of mitochondrial sirtuins, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
26 (2018) 3861–3865.
[3] X. Hu, W. Zheng, Chemical probes in sirtuin research, in: W. Zheng (Ed.), Progress
in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, Sirtuins in Health and Disease, Vol.
154 Academic Press, 2018, pp. 1–24.
[4] N. Rajabi, I. Galleano, A.S. Madsen, C.A. Olsen, Targeting sirtuins: substrate specificity and inhibitor design, in: W. Zheng (Ed.), Progress in Molecular Biology and
Translational Science, Sirtuins in Health and Disease, Vol. 154 Academic Press,
2018, pp. 25–69.
[5] S. Li, W. Zheng, Mammalian sirtuins SIRT4 and SIRT7, in: W. Zheng (Ed.), Progress
in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, Sirtuins in Health and Disease, Vol.
154 Academic Press, 2018, pp. 147–168.
[6] V.J. Carabetta, I.M. Cristea, Regulation, function, and detection of protein acetylation in bacteria, J. Bacteriol. 199 (2017) e00107–17.
[7] P. Bheda, H. Jing, C. Wolberger, H. Lin, The substrate specificity of sirtuins, Annu.
Rev. Biochem. 85 (2016) 405–429.
[8] B. Chen, et al., The chemical biology of sirtuins, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015)
5246–5264.
[9] P. Martínez-Redondo, A. Vaquero, The diversity of histone versus nonhistone sirtuin
substrates, Genes Cancer 4 (2013) 148–163.
[10] W.F. Hawse, C. Wolberger, Structure-based mechanism of ADP-ribosylation by
sirtuins, J. Biol. Chem. 284 (2009) 33654–33661.
[11] T.M. Kowieski, S. Lee, J.M. Denu, Acetylation-dependent ADP-ribosylation by
Trypanosoma brucei Sir2, J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008) 5317–5326.
[12] K. Fahie, et al., Side chain specificity of ADP-ribosylation by a sirtuin, FEBS J. 276
(2009) 7159–7176.
[13] J.B. French, Y. Cen, A.A. Sauve, Plasmodium falciparum Sir2 is an NAD+-dependent deacetylase and an acetyllysine-dependent and acetyllysine-independent
NAD+ glycohydrolase, Biochemistry 47 (2008) 10227–10239.
[14] J. Du, H. Jiang, H. Lin, Investigating the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of sirtuins
with NAD analogues and 32P-NAD, Biochemistry 48 (2009) 2878–2890.
[15] S. Imai, C.M. Armstrong, M. Kaeberlein, L. Guarente, Transcriptional silencing and
longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase, Nature 403 (2000)
795–800.
(1) The biochemical/structural characterization of the plant sirtuins:
(a) to examine the acyl specificity of the plant sirtuin-catalyzed Nεacyl-lysine deacylation, as illustrated in Fig. 1; (b) to examine the
substrate specificity of the plant sirtuin-catalyzed deacylation; (c) to
examine whether the plant sirtuins also possess an appreciable
mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, as illustrated in Fig. 2; (d) to
examine the possible functional cross-talk of the plant sirtuins with
the members from other plant histone deacetylase (HDAC) families,
i.e. the RPD3-HDA1 family and the plant specific type-II (HD2)
7
Plant Science 293 (2020) 110434
W. Zheng
28–36.
[43] X. Zhong, et al., The rice NAD(+)-dependent histone deacetylase OsSRT1 targets
preferentially to stress- and metabolism-related genes and transposable elements,
PLoS One 8 (2013) e66807.
[44] L. Huang, et al., Down-regulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2-related histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death
in rice, Plant Physiol. 144 (2007) 1508–1519.
[45] Y. Lu, et al., Dynamics and functional interplay of histone lysine butyrylation,
crotonylation, and acetylation in rice under starvation and submergence, Genome
Biol. 19 (2018) 144.
[46] P.J. Chung, Y.S. Kim, S.H. Park, B.H. Nahm, J.K. Kim, Subcellular localization of
rice histone deacetylases in organelles, FEBS Lett. 583 (2009) 2249–2254.
[47] Z. Chen, et al., Acetylome profiling reveals extensive lysine acetylation of the fatty
acid metabolism pathway in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Mol. Cell
Proteomics 17 (2018) 399–412.
[48] C. Yang, et al., Characterization and subcellular localization of histone deacetylases
and their roles in response to abiotic stresses in soybean, BMC Plant Biol. 18 (2018)
226.
[49] M. Cucurachi, et al., Characterization and differential expression analysis of complete coding sequences of Vitis vinifera L. Sirtuin genes, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 54
(2012) 123–132.
[50] F. Aquea, T. Timmermann, P. Arce-Johnson, Analysis of histone acetyltransferase
and deacetylase families of Vitis vinifera, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48 (2010)
194–199.
[51] L. Zhao, et al., Identification and characterization of histone deacetylases in tomato
(Solanum lycopersicum), Front. Plant Sci. 5 (2015) 760.
[52] J. Chu, Z. Chen, Molecular identification of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases in lower plant Marchantia polymorpha, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 132 (2018)
612–622.
[53] S. Zhao, X. Zhang, H. Li, Beyond histone acetylation-writing and erasing histone
acylations, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 53 (2018) 169–177.
[54] A. Dutta, S.M. Abmayr, J.L. Workman, Diverse activities of histone acylations
connect metabolism to chromatin function, Mol. Cell 63 (2016) 547–552.
[55] N.J. Porter, D.W. Christianson, Structure, mechanism, and inhibition of the zincdependent histone deacetylases, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 59 (2019) 9–18.
[56] B. He, J. Du, H. Lin, Thiosuccinyl peptides as Sirt5-specific inhibitors, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 134 (2012) 1922–1925.
[57] J. Hu, B. He, S. Bhargava, H. Lin, A fluorogenic assay for screening Sirt6 modulators, Org. Biomol. Chem. 11 (2013) 5213–5216.
[58] C.M. Grozinger, E.D. Chao, H.E. Blackwell, D. Moazed, S.L. Schreiber, Identification
of a class of small molecule inhibitors of the sirtuin family of NAD-dependent
deacetylases by phenotypic screening, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 38837–38843.
[59] S. Singh, et al., Sirtinol, a Sir2 protein inhibitor, affects stem cell maintenance and
root development in Arabidopsis thaliana by modulating auxin-cytokinin signaling
components, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 42450.
[60] X. Dai, K. Hayashi, H. Nozaki, Y. Cheng, Y. Zhao, Genetic and chemical analyses of
the action mechanisms of sirtinol in Arabidopsis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 102
(2005) 3129–3134.
[61] Y. Zhao, X. Dai, H.E. Blackwell, S.L. Schreiber, J. Chory, SIR1, an upstream component in auxin signaling identified by chemical genetics, Science 301 (2003)
1107–1110.
[62] C. Hollender, Z. Liu, Histone deacetylase genes in Arabidopsis development, J.
Integr, Plant Biol. 50 (2008) 875–885.
[63] X. Ma, S. Lv, C. Zhang, C. Yang, Histone deacetylases and their functions in plants,
Plant Cell Rep. 32 (2013) 465–478.
[64] W. Kupis, J. Pałyga, E. Tomal, E. Niewiadomska, The role of sirtuins in cellular
homeostasis, J. Physiol. Biochem. 72 (2016) 371–380.
[65] V. Grandperret, V. Nicolas-Francès, D. Wendehenne, S. Bourque, Type-II histone
deacetylases: elusive plant nuclear signal transducers, Plant Cell Environ. 37 (2014)
1259–1269.
[66] W. Zheng, Mechanism-based modulator discovery for sirtuin-catalyzed deacetylation reaction, Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 13 (2013) 132–154.
[16] S. Greiss, A. Gartner, Sirtuin/Sir2 phylogeny, evolutionary considerations and
structural conservation, Mol. Cells 28 (2009) 407–415.
[17] Y. Wang, J. Yang, T. Hong, X. Chen, L. Cui, SIRT2: Controversy and multiple roles in
disease and physiology, Ageing Res. Rev. 55 (2019) 100961.
[18] A.R. Chang, C.M. Ferrer, R. Mostoslavsky, SIRT6, a mammalian deacylase with
multitasking abilities, Physiol. Rev. 100 (2020) 145–169.
[19] F.A. Lagunas-Rangel, Current role of mammalian sirtuins in DNA repair, DNA
Repair (Amst) 80 (2019) 85–92.
[20] T. Kosciuk, M. Wang, J.Y. Hong, H. Lin, Updates on the epigenetic roles of sirtuins,
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 51 (2019) 18–29.
[21] Z. Min, J. Gao, Y. Yu, The roles of mitochondrial SIRT4 in cellular metabolism,
Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 9 (2019) 783.
[22] D. Wu, Y. Li, K.S. Zhu, H. Wang, W.G. Zhu, Advances in cellular characterization of
the sirtuin isoform, SIRT7, Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 9 (2018) 652.
[23] S. Kumar, D.B. Lombard, Functions of the sirtuin deacylase SIRT5 in normal physiology and pathobiology, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53 (2018) 311–334.
[24] M.S. Elkhwanky, J. Hakkola, Extranuclear sirtuins and metabolic stress, Antioxid.
Redox Signal. 28 (2018) 662–676.
[25] L.R. Bringman-Rodenbarger, A.H. Guo, C.A. Lyssiotis, D.B. Lombard, Emerging
roles for SIRT5 in metabolism and cancer, Antioxid. Redox Signal. 28 (2018)
677–690.
[26] C. Sebastián, R. Mostoslavsky, The role of mammalian sirtuins in cancer metabolism, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 43 (2015) 33–42.
[27] J.E. Choi, R. Mostoslavsky, Sirtuins, metabolism, and DNA repair, Curr. Opin.
Genet. Dev. 26 (2014) 24–32.
[28] Y. Jiang, J. Liu, D. Chen, L. Yan, W. Zheng, Sirtuin inhibition: strategies, inhibitors,
and therapeutic potential, Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 38 (2017) 459–472.
[29] B.C. Smith, J.M. Denu, Sir2 protein deacetylases: evidence for chemical intermediates and functions of a conserved histidine, Biochemistry 45 (2006) 272–282.
[30] Y. Wang, et al., Deacylation mechanism by SIRT2 revealed in the 1’-SH-2’-O-myristoyl intermediate structure, Cell Chem. Biol. 24 (2017) 339–345.
[31] Y. Wang, et al., An overview of sirtuins as potential therapeutic target: structure,
function and modulators, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 161 (2019) 48–77.
[32] S.H. Neo, B.L. Tang, Sirtuins as modifiers of huntington’s disease (HD) pathology,
in: W. Zheng (Ed.), Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science,
Sirtuins in Health and Disease, Vol. 154 Academic Press, 2018, pp. 105–145.
[33] M. Schiedel, D. Robaa, T. Rumpf, W. Sippl, M. Jung, The current state of NAD+dependent histone deacetylases (sirtuins) as novel therapeutic targets, Med. Res.
Rev. 38 (2018) 147–200.
[34] T. Wang, et al., Recent progress on the discovery of Sirt2 inhibitors for the treatment of various cancers, Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 19 (2019) 1051–1058.
[35] H. Dai, D.A. Sinclair, J.L. Ellis, C. Steegborn, Sirtuin activators and inhibitors:
promises, achievements, and challenges, Pharmacol. Ther. 188 (2018) 140–154.
[36] R. Pandey, et al., Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase families of Arabidopsis thaliana suggests functional diversification of chromatin
modification among multicellular eukaryotes, Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002)
5036–5055.
[37] X. Liu, et al., Histone deacetylase AtSRT1 links metabolic flux and stress response in
Arabidopsis, Mol. Plant 10 (2017) 1510–1522.
[38] A.C. König, et al., The Arabidopsis class II sirtuin is a lysine deacetylase and interacts with mitochondrial energy metabolism, Plant Physiol. 164 (2014)
1401–1414.
[39] C. Wang, et al., Arabidopsis putative deacetylase AtSRT2 regulates basal defense by
suppressing PAD4, EDS5 and SID2 expression, Plant Cell Physiol. 51 (2010)
1291–1299.
[40] H. Zhang, Y. Zhao, D.X. Zhou, Rice NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase OsSRT1
represses glycolysis and regulates the moonlighting function of GAPDH as a transcriptional activator of glycolytic genes, Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (2017)
12241–12255.
[41] C. Fang, et al., Control of leaf senescence by an MeOH-jasmonates cascade that is
epigenetically regulated by OsSRT1 in rice, Mol. Plant 9 (2016) 1366–1378.
[42] H. Zhang, Y. Lu, Y. Zhao, D.X. Zhou, OsSRT1 is involved in rice seed development
through regulation of starch metabolism gene expression, Plant Sci. 248 (2016)
8
Descargar