DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS STATISTICS DIVISION UNITED NATIONS ____________________________________________________________________________________________ SEEA for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Global Consultation Comment Form Deadline for responses: 30 January 2015 Please send responses to: [email protected] Your name: Your country/organization: Contact (e.g. email address): JOSE GARCIA ZANABRIA PERU NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS AND INFORMATION [email protected] To submit responses please save this document and send it as an attachment to the following e-mail address: [email protected]. The comment form has been designed to facilitate the analysis of comments. In Part I general comments on the general style, structure, content and coverage of the chapter are sought. In Part II any technical and other comments should be included. Relevant documents Before submitting responses you are encouraged to read the accompanying draft paper available on the SEEA website http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seea.asp SEEA for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries: Draft for initial global consultation Part I: General comments In this section please provide general comments on the draft. You may like to consider providing comments on the style and tone, the structure and organisation, the content and coverage, and the general accessibility of the material. We believe that the material reached the SEEA-FFA system is a guide for the improvement of economic accounts of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries sectors, which necessitates the development of annual data bases of these sectors in greater detail and to consider environmental impact issues in the development of these activities, which included a chapter of organic crops is showing development dinamico.en emerging countries. and the inclusion of these products in trade agreements. Part II: Technical and other comments In the box below please supply any additional comments including those of a more technical nature. Please reference your responses with the relevant paragraph numbers or section numbers. In item 4.4, should be considered in measuring the production of livestock animals, the disaggregation of animals for slaughter, for fixed capital formation plus the costs of growing animal Comments on the draft System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (SEEA AFF). National Institute of Statistics and Informatics-PERU January 20, 2015 National Institute of Statistics and Informatics are pleased to give its views on the draft System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (SEEA AFF) and consider the draft as a very important tool which allows picking up views from different countries. First general view: National Statistics Offices will have to enhance sources of information and asses in depth nexus between productivity Agriculture and environmental factors. Conventionally, our main sources of statistics in tonnes and prices at gate farm for a vast numbers of products including coca leaves and classified at regional level, monthly, quarterly and annual data were provided by Ministry of Agriculture, Production and DEVIDA. With the implementation of the new system, we need to focus in other sources as research centers, public universities, and other institutions to gather all the data available. For us, there is a particular interest in knowing the way to measure inputs of ecosystems services and request for more clarification in this field. View with reference to point 13. The scope of the SEEA AFF covers Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries activities. In Peru, chicken meat is one of the main sources in Peruvian food. Our proposal is, to denominate Agriculture& Livestock, Forestry and Fisheries Views with reference to table 1.1 Data domains of the SEEA AFF. It would be desirable to include from the beginning the following factors involved straightforward in the output process. • Machinery & equipment and infrastructure investment in irrigations, bridges, roads and internet access. Taking into consideration that farmers could see diminish substantive losses of harvest seasons if they have easy access to appropriate means of communications. • Research and Development developed by private or public sector. Public Universities, Research Institutions could help bringing statistics about soil or seed quality for example. • Numbers of farmers by age and gender, engaged in this activity breakdown by Agriculture, Livestock, Forestry and Fishering. • Wages and salaries keeping in mind, employers use to demand workers at stage seeding and harvest season. We think special treatment is needed. • Numbers of credits to measure financing and allocation of funding to smallholder farmers who face major concerns and large business devoted mainly for cropping agriexports products. Views with reference to point 1.3.2 Related statistical documents and initiatives Implementation of the global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statictics There is a challenge implementing new data requirements relating to global warming, land and water use, food and feed commodities to produce biofuels and others and is urgent to develop a standard classification by codes. Related to conventional statistics, one way to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics is throughout education. Farmers interviewers need to be well informed about the importance of basic data. As counterpart, stakeholders should support them giving selected information in order to help them facing plagues or improve their productivity. If they are not aware of the vital importance, compilers will continue gathering misleading data and increasing time consistency process affecting timeliness. We know there are very useful guides posted in web sites but one of the barriers apart from the access to networks due to location of farms in remote areas is language. Views with reference to point 2.3.3 Applications at sub-national level We welcome the process of mapping individual sets; as a result this process will show similarities or discrepancies within a country or among neighbor countries. For example coca leaf is a crop of particular importance and analytical interest. In countries where it is cultivated there would be interchange of experiences and set up a common way for productivity measurements and their relationship with environment. Views with reference to point 3.3.2 SEEA AFF Physical flow accounts We consider important to treat apart valuation because many times in practice it constitutes in a real constraint due to the various statistics in prices. We know both of them have to balance but valuation at farmer gate prices or prices output differs in a substantive way from prices consumers. Common products use to be those which destinies are exports. How to balance measurement with heterogeneous prices? After all, taking in consideration the volatility of prices in external market. Another interesting issue can be to count with reliable tables showing wholesale and retail margin products (Supply chains). Views with reference to point 4.4.2 Accounting entries We would like to stress the importance of this table. It shows meat and not animal alive and it means different amounts. In our understanding meat is for food industry and animal alive for Livestock. On the other hand, statistics from Ministry of Agriculture comes in meat tonnes and estimated of animal alive by variety. In order to get more accuracy in livestock measurement we request for more detail. Thank You very much for giving us an opportunity to be involved in this important Project. Yours sincerely Bertha Rodriguez SCAE de Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca Formulario de Comentario de la Consulta Global Fecha límite para Respuestas: 30 de enero 2015 Por favor, envíe las respuestas: [email protected] Su nombre: Su país/ Organización: INEI Contacto (ejem. Correo Electrónico) ERIKA ANTUNEZ ONCOY [email protected] Para enviar las respuestas por favor, guarde este documento y enviarlo como un archivo adjunto a la siguiente dirección de correo electrónico: [email protected]. El formulario ha sido diseñado para facilitar el análisis de los comentarios. En los comentarios generales de la Parte I en estilo general se buscan, la estructura, el contenido y la cobertura del capítulo. En la segunda parte los comentarios técnicos y otros deben ser incluidos. Documentos pertinentes Antes de enviar las respuestas se le anima a leer el proyecto de documento de acompañamiento en la página web del SCAE http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seea.asp Parte I: Comentarios Generales En esta sección, por favor proporcionar comentarios generales sobre el proyecto. Es posible que quiera considerar proporcionar comentarios sobre el estilo y el tono, la estructura y organización, el contenido y la cobertura y la accesibilidad general del material. Hacer click aquí y empiece a escribir (La longitud de su respuesta no está limitada por este cuadro de texto. Parte II: Comentarios técnicos y otros En el cuadro de abajo indique a continuación las observaciones adicionales, incluyendo las de carácter más técnico. Por favor, consulte las respuestas con los números de los párrafos pertinentes o números de sección. En la Tabla 3.5: SEEA AFF Combined presentation: Activity and product specific inputs, en la parte que refiere de la actividad Pesca se especifica una desagregación (Acuicultura, pescados demersales, pescados pelágicos, otros pescados marítimos y crustáceos) en cantidades y valores. Para el caso de toneladas, nuestra fuente principal es el Ministerio de la Producción, y la información que brinda viene desagregada de la siguiente manera: 1. Marítimo: a. Pescados: Pescados pelágicos, pescados demersales, pescados costeros (pelágicos y demersales) y otros pescados. b. Mariscos: Crustáceos y moluscos; y c. Otras especies. 2. Pesca Continental. Por ello, se debería llegar a un acuerdo con dicha institución. Por la parte del cálculo del VBP, que elabora la DNCN, la desagregación por productos tampoco es igual. Para los cálculos de Oferta y Utilización la dirección utiliza la siguiente clasificación de productos: 1. Anchoveta, 2. Jurel, 3. Perico, 4. Caballa, 5. Otros peces marítimos, 6. Peces de agua dulce, 7. Conchas de abanico, 8. Pota y 9. Otros crustáceos, moluscos, algas e invertebrados acuáticos. Por ello, se recomienda revisar los productos de las actividades de Agricultura , Silvicultura y Pesca, que trabaja Cuentas Nacionales. En la Tabla 3.8: SEEA AFF Combined presentation: Cross industry and activity perspectives también se menciona otra desagregación de la Pesca (Acuicultura de agua dulce y marina; y Pesca de agua dulce y marina), aquí se detallan en la parte derecha muchas variables económicas, tales como: Producción nacional, consumo intermedio, exportaciones, entre otras, en millones de soles. Cabe indicar que, la DNCN la actividad Pesca la desagrega de otra manera (ya mencionado anteriormente), de manera que sería hacer un nuevo Cuadro de oferta y utilización para determinar cada variable. En el ítem 4.8 Physical flow account for fish and other aquatic products, numeral 136, se muestra 12 agrupaciones del total de especies de recursos marinos ( 1. Peces de agua dulce, 2. Diadromos, 3. Los peces demersales, 4. Atún, bonito, 5. Otros peces pelágicos, 6. Otros peces marinos, 7. Crustáceos, 8. Cefalópodos, 9. Otros moluscos, 10. Mamíferos acuáticos, 11. Otros animales acuáticos y 12. Plantas acuáticas). Sin embargo, como ya se explicó no se tiene la misma desagregación de nuestra fuente principal, el PRODUCE. En la tabla 4.8: Physical flow account for fish and aquatic products (tonnes), igualmente se tiene que conciliar la desagregación de especies de la actividad Pesca. Además, en la parte derecha (filas) hay variables como captura de descarte, cosecha perdida o producción incomible. Ello no es elaborado por DNCN, se tendría que determinar una metodología de cálculo, conjuntamente con el PRODUCE. Finalmente, debo recomendar una coordinación con PRODUCE, INEI y FAO para determinar los productos a desarrollarse como Sistema de Cuentas Económico Ambiental de las actividades de Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca.